crossover interference
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

110
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Dutreux ◽  
Abhishek Dutta ◽  
Emilien Peltier ◽  
Sabrina Bibi-Triki ◽  
Anne Friedrich ◽  
...  

Meiotic recombination has been deeply characterized in a few model species only, notably in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Interestingly, most members of the ZMM pathway that implements meiotic crossover interference in S. cerevisiae have been lost in Lachancea yeast species after the divergence of Lachancea kluyveri from the rest of the clade. This suggests major differences in the control of crossover distribution. After investigating meiosis in L. kluyveri, we determined the meiotic recombination landscape of Lachancea waltii and identified several characteristics that should help understand better the underlying mechanisms. Such characteristics include systematic regions of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in L. waltii hybrids, compatible with dysregulated Spo11-mediated DNA double strand breaks (DSB) independently of meiosis. They include a higher recombination rate in L. waltii than in L. kluyveri despite the lack of multiple ZMM pro-crossover factors. L. waltii exhibits an elevated frequency of zero-crossover bivalents as L. kluyveri but opposite to S. cerevisiae. L. waltii gene conversion tracts lengths are comparable to those observed in S. cerevisiae and shorter than in L. kluyveri despite the lack of Mlh2, a factor limiting conversion tracts size in S. cerevisiae. L. waltii recombination hotspots are not shared with either S. cerevisiae or L. kluyveri, showing that meiotic recombination hotspots can evolve at a rather limited evolutionary scale within budding yeasts. Finally, in line with the loss of several ZMM genes, we found only residual crossover interference in L. waltii likely coming from the modest interference existing between recombination precursors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (21) ◽  
pp. R1442-R1444
Author(s):  
Meret Arter ◽  
Scott Keeney

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Morgan ◽  
Martin A. White ◽  
F. Chris H. Franklin ◽  
Denise Zickler ◽  
Nancy Kleckner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gioia ◽  
Lisette Payero ◽  
Gianno Pannafino ◽  
Jun Jie Chen ◽  
Sagar Salim ◽  
...  

In most sexually reproducing organisms crossing over between chromosome homologs during meiosis is critical for the viability of haploid gametes. Most crossovers that form in meiosis in budding yeast result from the biased resolution of double Holliday Junction (dHJ) intermediates. This dHJ resolution step involves the actions Rad2/XPG family nuclease Exo1 and the Mlh1- Mlh3 mismatch repair endonuclease. At present little is known about how these factors act in meiosis at the molecular level. Here we show that Exo1 promotes meiotic crossing over by protecting DNA nicks from ligation. We found that structural elements in Exo1 required for interactions with DNA, such as bending of DNA during nick/flap recognition, are critical for its role in crossing over. Consistent with these observations, meiotic expression of the Rad2/XPG family member Rad27 partially rescued the crossover defect in exo1 null mutants, and meiotic overexpression of Cdc9 ligase specifically reduced the crossover levels of exo1 DNA binding mutants to levels approaching the exo1 null. In addition, our work identified a role for Exo1 in crossover interference that appears independent of its resection activity. Together, these studies provide experimental evidence for Exo1 protected nicks being critical for the formation of meiotic crossovers and their distribution.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangyu Zhang ◽  
Weston Stauffer ◽  
David Zwicker ◽  
Abby F. Dernburg

AbstractMeiotic recombination is highly regulated to ensure precise segregation of homologous chromosomes. Evidence from diverse organisms indicates that the synaptonemal complex (SC), which assembles between paired chromosomes, plays essential roles in crossover formation and patterning. Several additional “pro-crossover” proteins are also required for recombination intermediates to become crossovers. These typically form multiple foci or recombination nodules along SCs, and later accumulate at fewer, widely spaced sites. Here we report that in C. elegans CDK-2 is required to stabilize all crossover intermediates and stabilizes interactions among pro-crossover factors by phosphorylating MSH-5. Additionally, we show that the conserved RING domain proteins ZHP-3/4 diffuse along the SC and remain dynamic following their accumulation at recombination sites. Based on these and previous findings we propose a model in which recombination nodules arise through spatially restricted biomolecular condensation and then undergo a regulated coarsening process, resulting in crossover interference.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (33) ◽  
pp. e2021970118
Author(s):  
Longfei Zhu ◽  
Nadia Fernández-Jiménez ◽  
Maja Szymanska-Lejman ◽  
Alexandre Pelé ◽  
Charles J. Underwood ◽  
...  

The frequency and distribution of meiotic crossovers are tightly controlled; however, variation in this process can be observed both within and between species. Using crosses of two natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, Col and Ler, we mapped a crossover modifier locus to semidominant polymorphisms in SUPPRESSOR OF NPR1-1 INDUCIBLE 1 (SNI1), which encodes a component of the SMC5/6 complex. The sni1 mutant exhibits a modified pattern of recombination across the genome with crossovers elevated in chromosome distal regions but reduced in pericentromeres. Mutations in SNI1 result in reduced crossover interference and can partially restore the fertility of a Class I crossover pathway mutant, which suggests that the protein affects noninterfering crossover repair. Therefore, we tested genetic interactions between SNI1 and both RECQ4 and FANCM DNA helicases, which showed that additional Class II crossovers observed in the sni1 mutant are FANCM independent. Furthermore, genetic analysis of other SMC5/6 mutants confirms the observations of crossover redistribution made for SNI1. The study reveals the importance of the SMC5/6 complex in ensuring the proper progress of meiotic recombination in plants.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Morgan ◽  
John A. Fozard ◽  
Matthew Hartley ◽  
Ian R. Henderson ◽  
Kirsten Bomblies ◽  
...  

AbstractIn most organisms, the number and distribution of crossovers that occur during meiosis are tightly controlled. All chromosomes must receive at least one ‘obligatory crossover’ and crossovers are prevented from occurring near one another by ‘crossover interference’. However, the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon of crossover interference has remained mostly mysterious. Using quantitative super-resolution cytogenetics and mathematical modelling, we investigate crossover positioning in the Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type, an over-expressor of the conserved E3 ligase HEI10, and a hei10 heterozygous line. We show that crossover positions can be explained by a predictive, diffusion-mediated coarsening model, in which large, approximately evenly-spaced HEI10 foci grow at the expense of smaller, closely-spaced clusters. We propose this coarsening process explains many aspects of Arabidopsis crossover positioning, including crossover interference. Consistent with this model, we also demonstrate that crossover positioning can be predictably modified in vivo simply by altering HEI10 dosage, with higher and lower dosage leading to weaker and stronger crossover interference, respectively. As HEI10 is a conserved member of the RING finger protein family that functions in the interference-sensitive pathway for crossover formation, we anticipate that similar mechanisms may regulate crossover positioning in diverse eukaryotes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 134 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lexy von Diezmann ◽  
Ofer Rog

ABSTRACT The formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes is key to sexual reproduction. In most species, crossovers are spaced further apart than would be expected if they formed independently, a phenomenon termed crossover interference. Despite more than a century of study, the molecular mechanisms implementing crossover interference remain a subject of active debate. Recent findings of how signaling proteins control the formation of crossovers and about the interchromosomal interface in which crossovers form offer new insights into this process. In this Review, we present a cell biological and biophysical perspective on crossover interference, summarizing the evidence that links interference to the spatial, dynamic, mechanical and molecular properties of meiotic chromosomes. We synthesize this physical understanding in the context of prevailing mechanistic models that aim to explain how crossover interference is implemented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. e2103433118
Author(s):  
Wayne Crismani ◽  
Chloe Girard ◽  
Andrew Lloyd

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (12) ◽  
pp. e2023613118
Author(s):  
Laia Capilla-Pérez ◽  
Stéphanie Durand ◽  
Aurélie Hurel ◽  
Qichao Lian ◽  
Aurélie Chambon ◽  
...  

Meiotic crossovers (COs) have intriguing patterning properties, including CO interference, the tendency of COs to be well-spaced along chromosomes, and heterochiasmy, the marked difference in male and female CO rates. During meiosis, transverse filaments transiently associate the axes of homologous chromosomes, a process called synapsis that is essential for CO formation in many eukaryotes. Here, we describe the spatial organization of the transverse filaments in Arabidopsis (ZYP1) and show it to be evolutionary conserved. We show that in the absence of ZYP1 (zyp1a zyp1b null mutants), chromosomes associate in pairs but do not synapse. Unexpectedly, in absence of ZYP1, CO formation is not prevented but increased. Furthermore, genome-wide analysis of recombination revealed that CO interference is abolished, with the frequent observation of close COs. In addition, heterochiasmy was erased, with identical CO rates in males and females. This shows that the tripartite synaptonemal complex is dispensable for CO formation and has a key role in regulating their number and distribution, imposing CO interference and heterochiasmy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document