green crystal
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

RSC Advances ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (40) ◽  
pp. 22536-22545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael A. Amer ◽  
Mohamed M. Omran ◽  
Ahmed F. Rehab ◽  
Mohamad M. Ayad

Acid green dye was employed as a soft-template for the synthesis of polyaniline hollow nanotubes, which adsorb anionic and cationic dyes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (36) ◽  
pp. 6651-6656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Fang ◽  
Jiewei Deng ◽  
Yuan Yu ◽  
Yunyun Yang ◽  
Xiaowei Wang ◽  
...  

Coupling liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) with paper spray mass spectrometry (PS-MS) to analyze malachite green, crystal violet and their metabolites.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (19) ◽  
pp. 8138-8145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulei Wang ◽  
Keren Liao ◽  
Xiaojia Huang ◽  
Dongxing Yuan

Convenient, sensitive and environmentally friendly method for simultaneous monitoring of malachite green, crystal violet, leucomalachite green and leucocrystal violet in aquaculture water samples.


2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 1152-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Hurtaud-Pessel ◽  
Pierrick Couëdor ◽  
Eric Verdon ◽  
Dawn Dowell

Abstract During the AOAC Annual Meeting held from September 30 to October 3, 2012 in Las Vegas, NV, the Expert Review Panel (ERP) on Veterinary Drug Residues reviewed data for the method for determination of residues of three triphenylmethane dyes and their metabolites (malachite green, leuco malachite green, crystal violet, leuco crystal violet, and brilliant green) in aquaculture products by LC/MS/MS, previously published in the Journal of Chromatography A 1218, 1632–1645 (2006). The method data were reviewed and compared to the standard method performance requirements (SMPRs) found in SMPR 2009.001, published in AOAC's Official Methods of Analysis, 19th Ed. (2012). The ERP determined that the data were acceptable, and the method was approved AOAC Official First Action. The method uses acetonitrile to isolate the analyte from the matrix. Then determination is conducted by LC/MS/MS with positive electrospray ionization. Accuracy ranged from 100.1 to 109.8% for samples fortified at levels of 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 2.0 μg/kg. Precision ranged from 2.0 to 10.3% RSD for the intraday samples and 1.9 to 10.6% for the interday samples analyzed over 3 days. The described method is designed to accurately operate in the analytical range from 0.5 to 2 μg/kg, where the minimum required performance limit for laboratories has been fixed in the European Union at 2.0 μg/kg for these banned substances and their metabolites. Upper levels of concentrations (1–100 μg/kg) can be analyzed depending on the different optional calibrations used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document