hydrophobic effects
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

166
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

34
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Borja Gómez-González ◽  
Luis García-Río ◽  
Nuno Basílio ◽  
Juan C. Mejuto ◽  
Jesus Simal-Gandara

The formation of inclusion complexes between alkylsulfonate guests and a cationic pillar[5]arene receptor in water was investigated by NMR and ITC techniques. The results show the formation of host-guest complexes stabilized by electrostatic interactions and hydrophobic effects with binding constants of up to 107 M−1 for the guest with higher hydrophobic character. Structurally, the alkyl chain of the guest is included in the hydrophobic aromatic cavity of the macrocycle while the sulfonate groups are held in the multicationic portal by ionic interactions.


Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Rego ◽  
Amish J. Patel

The aversion of hydrophobic solutes for water drives diverse interactions and assemblies across materials science, biology, and beyond. Here, we review the theoretical, computational, and experimental developments that underpin a contemporary understanding of hydrophobic effects. We discuss how an understanding of density fluctuations in bulk water can shed light on the fundamental differences in the hydration of molecular and macroscopic solutes; these differences, in turn, explain why hydrophobic interactions become stronger upon increasing temperature. We also illustrate the sensitive dependence of surface hydrophobicity on the chemical and topographical patterns the surface displays, which makes the use of approximate approaches for estimating hydrophobicity particularly challenging. Importantly, the hydrophobicity of complex surfaces, such as those of proteins, which display nanoscale heterogeneity, can nevertheless be characterized using interfacial water density fluctuations; such a characterization also informs protein regions that mediate their interactions. Finally, we build upon an understanding of hydrophobic hydration and the ability to characterize hydrophobicity to inform the context-dependent thermodynamic forces that drive hydrophobic interactions and the desolvation barriers that impede them. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, Volume 13 is March 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Author(s):  
Juan Angel de Gracia Triviño ◽  
Mårten S. G. Ahlquist

AbstractIntermolecular radical coupling (also interaction of two metal centers I2M) is one of the main mechanisms for O–O bond formation in water oxidation catalysts. For Ru(bda)L2 (H2bda = 2,2′-bipyridine-6,6′-dicarboxylate, L = pyridine or similar nitrogen containing heterocyclic ligands) catalysts a significant driving force in water solution is the hydrophobic effects driven by the solvent. The same catalyst has been successfully employed to generate N2 from ammonia, also via I2M, but here the solvent was acetonitrile where hydrophobic effects are absent. We used a classical force field for the key intermediate [RuVIN(bda)(py)2]+ to simulate the dimerization free energy by calculation of the potential mean force, in both water and acetonitrile to understand the differences and similarities. In both solvents the complex dimerizes with similar free energy profiles. In water the complexes are essentially free cations with limited ion paring, while in acetonitrile the ion-pairing is much more significant. This ion-pairing leads to significant screening of the charges, making dimerization possible despite lower solvent polarity that could lead to repulsion between the charged complexes. In water the lower ion pairing is compensated by the hydrophobic effect leading to favorable dimerization despite repulsion of the charges. A hypothetical doubly charged [RuVIIN(bda)py2]2+ was also studied for deeper understanding of the charge effect. Despite the double charge the complexes only dimerized favorably in the lower dielectric solvent acetonitrile, while in water the separated state is more stable. In the doubly charged catalyst the effect of ion-pairing is even more pronounced in acetonitrile where it is fully paired similar to the 1+ complex, while in water the separation of the ions leads to greater repulsion between the two catalysts, which prevents dimerization. Graphic Abstract


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7547
Author(s):  
Francesco Mallamace ◽  
Domenico Mallamace ◽  
Sow-Hsin Chen ◽  
Paola Lanzafame ◽  
Georgia Papanikolaou

NMR spectroscopy is used in the temperature range 180–350 K to study the local order and transport properties of pure liquid water (bulk and confined) and its solutions with glycerol and methanol at different molar fractions. We focused our interest on the hydrophobic effects (HE), i.e., the competition between hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. Nowadays, compared to hydrophilicity, little is known about hydrophobicity. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to gain new information about hydrophobicity. As the liquid water properties are dominated by polymorphism (two coexisting liquid phases of high and low density) due to hydrogen bond interactions (HB), creating (especially in the supercooled regime) the tetrahedral networking, we focused our interest to the HE of these structures. We measured the relaxation times (T1 and T2) and the self-diffusion (DS). From these times, we took advantage of the NMR property to follow the behaviors of each molecular component (the hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups) separately. In contrast, DS is studied in terms of the Adam–Gibbs model by obtaining the configurational entropy (Sconf) and the specific heat contributions (CP,conf). We find that, for the HE, all of the studied quantities behave differently. For water–glycerol, the HB interaction is dominant for all conditions; water–methanol, two different T-regions above and below 265 K are observable, dominated by hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity, respectively. Below this temperature, where the LDL phase and the HB network develops and grows, with the times and CP,conf change behaviors leading to maxima and minima. Above it, the HB becomes weak and less stable, the HDL dominates, and hydrophobicity determines the solution.


Biopolymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt Nordén ◽  
Tom Brown ◽  
Bobo Feng

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyang Zhang ◽  
Lin Cheng ◽  
Hao Nian ◽  
Jiang Du ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
...  

Tetraphenylethene-based tetracationic cyclophanes exhibited adaptive chirality with fluorescence enhancement or/and induced CD when combined with ATP and DNA via hydrophobic effects and electrostatic interactions in water.


2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (12) ◽  
pp. 5876-5883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiz-Ur Rahman ◽  
Demeter Tzeli ◽  
Ioannis D. Petsalakis ◽  
Giannoula Theodorakopoulos ◽  
Pablo Ballester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 294 ◽  
pp. 109860
Author(s):  
Jifei Hou ◽  
Xuede Li ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Jingya Sun ◽  
Shourong Zheng

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 1705-1711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Zhu Tao ◽  
Xin-Long Ni

The unique monomer and excimer fluorescence emissions of pyrene were first exploited as distinctly photophysical signals to identify the possible diastereomers of guests within nor-seco-cucurbit[10]uril (NS-CB[10]) cavities. Further experiments revealed that balancing the hydrophilic and hydrophobic effects of the guest in aqueous solution can improve the molecular recognition and binding ability of NS-CB[10].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document