leaf patterning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Mo ◽  
Liangliang He ◽  
Ye Liu ◽  
Dongfa Wang ◽  
Baolin Zhao ◽  
...  

Simple and compound which are the two basic types of leaves are distinguished by the pattern of the distribution of blades on the petiole. Compared to simple leaves comprising a single blade, compound leaves have multiple blade units and exhibit more complex and diverse patterns of organ organization, and the molecular mechanisms underlying their pattern formation are receiving more and more attention in recent years. Studies in model legume Medicago truncatula have led to an improved understanding of the genetic control of the compound leaf patterning. This review is an attempt to summarize the current knowledge about the compound leaf morphogenesis of M. truncatula, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms involved in pattern formation. It also includes some comparisons of the molecular mechanisms between leaf morphogenesis of different model species and offers useful information for the molecular design of legume crops.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E Hughes ◽  
Jane A Langdale

The flexible deployment of developmental regulators is an increasingly appreciated aspect of plant development and evolution. The GRAS transcription factor SCARECROW (SCR) regulates the development of the endodermis in Arabidopsis and maize roots, but during leaf development it regulates the development of distinct cell-types; bundle-sheath in Arabidopsis and mesophyll in maize. In rice, SCR is implicated in stomatal patterning, but it is unknown whether this function is additional to a role in inner leaf patterning. Here, we demonstrate that two duplicated SCR genes function redundantly in rice. Contrary to previous reports, we show that these genes are necessary for stomatal development, with stomata virtually absent from leaves that are initiated after germination of mutants. The stomatal regulator OsMUTE is down-regulated in Osscr1;Osscr2 mutants indicating that OsSCR acts early in stomatal development. Notably, Osscr1;Osscr2 mutants do not exhibit the inner leaf patterning perturbations seen in Zmscr1;Zmscr1h mutants and Zmscr1;Zmscr1h mutants do not exhibit major perturbations in stomatal patterning. Taken together, these results indicate that SCR was deployed in different developmental contexts after the divergence of rice and maize around 50 million years ago.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Bresson ◽  
Jasmin Doll ◽  
Francois Vasseur ◽  
Mark Stahl ◽  
Edda von Roepenack-Lahaye ◽  
...  

In annual plants, tight coordination of successive developmental events is of primary importance to optimize performance under fluctuating environmental conditions. The recent finding of the genetic interaction of WRKY53 , a key senescence-related gene with REVOLUTA , a master regulator of early leaf patterning, raises the question of how early and late developmental events are connected. Here, we investigated the developmental and metabolic consequences of an alteration of the REVOLUTA  and WRKY53 gene expression, from seedling to fruiting . Our results show that REVOLUTA critically controls late developmental phases and reproduction while inversely WRKY53 determines vegetative growth at early developmental stages. We further show that these regulators of distinct developmental phases frequently, but not continuously, interact throughout ontogeny and demonstrated that their genetic interaction is mediated by the salicylic acid (SA). Moreover, we showed that REVOLUTA  and WRKY53  are keys regulatory nodes of development and plant immunity thought their role in SA metabolic pathways, which also highlights the role of REV in pathogen defence. Together, our findings demonstrate how late and early developmental events are tightly intertwined by molecular hubs. These hubs interact with each other throughout ontogeny, and participate to the interplay between plant development and immunity.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Israeli ◽  
Ori Ben-Herzel ◽  
Yogev Burko ◽  
Ido Shwartz ◽  
Hadas Ben-Gera ◽  
...  

SummaryThe variability in leaf form in nature is immense. Leaf patterning occurs by differential growth that occurs during a limited window of morphogenetic activity at the leaf marginal meristem. While many regulators have been implicated in the designation of the morphogenetic window and in leaf patterning, how these effectors interact to generate a particular form is still not well understood.We addressed the interaction among different effectors of tomato compound leaf development, using genetic and molecular analyses.Mutations in the tomato auxin response factor SlARF5/SlMP, which promotes leaflet formation, suppressed the increased leaf complexity of mutants with extended morphogenetic window. Impaired activity of the NAC/CUC transcription factor GOBLET (GOB), which specifies leaflet boundaries, also reduced leaf complexity in these backgrounds. Analysis of genetic interactions showed that the patterning factors SlMP, GOB and the MYB transcription factor LYRATE (LYR) act in parallel to promote leaflet formation.This work places an array of developmental regulators in a morphogenetic context. It reveals how organ-level differentiation rate and local growth are coordinated to sculpture an organ. These concepts and findings are applicable to other plant species and developmental processes that are regulated by patterning and differentiation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1501-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Muszynski ◽  
Lindsay Moss-Taylor ◽  
Sivanandan Chudalayandi ◽  
James Cahill ◽  
Angel R. Del Valle-Echevarria ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 562-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanen Zhou ◽  
Lu Han ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Hongfeng Wang ◽  
Jin Nakashima ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Muszynski ◽  
Lindsay Moss-Taylor ◽  
Sivanandan Chudalayandi ◽  
James Cahill ◽  
Angel R. Del Valle-Echevarria ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTLeaf morphogenesis requires growth polarized along three axes - proximal-distal, medial-lateral and abaxial-adaxial. Grass leaves display a prominent proximal-distal (P-D) polarity consisting of a proximal sheath separated from the distal blade by the auricle and ligule. Although proper specification of the four segments is essential for normal morphology, our knowledge is incomplete regarding the mechanisms which influence P-D specification in monocots like maize (Zea mays). Here we report the identification of the gene underlying the semi-dominant, leaf patterning, maize mutant Hairy Sheath Frayed1 (Hsf1). Hsf1 plants produce leaves with outgrowths consisting of proximal segments – sheath, auricle and ligule – emanating from the distal blade margin. Analysis of three independent Hsf1 alleles revealed gain-of-function missense mutations in the ligand binding domain of the maize cytokinin (CK) receptor Zea mays Histidine Kinase1 (ZmHK1) gene. Biochemical analysis and structural modeling suggest the mutated residues near the CK binding pocket affect CK binding affinity. Treatment of wild type seedlings with exogenous CK phenocopied the Hsf1 leaf phenotypes. Results from expression and epistatic analyses indicated the Hsf1 mutant receptor appears to be hypersignaling. Our results demonstrate that hypersignaling of CK in incipient leaf primordia can reprogram developmental patterns in maize.SummaryIncreased cytokinin signaling in the maize Hairy Sheath Frayed1 mutant modifies leaf development leading to changes in pattering, growth and cell identity.


Plants ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Xiong ◽  
Yuling Jiao

Leaves, the primary plant organs that function in photosynthesis and respiration, have highly organized, flat structures that vary within and among species. In recent years, it has become evident that auxin plays central roles in leaf development, including leaf initiation, blade formation, and compound leaf patterning. In this review, we discuss how auxin maxima form to define leaf primordium formation. We summarize recent progress in understanding of how spatial auxin signaling promotes leaf blade formation. Finally, we discuss how spatial auxin transport and signaling regulate the patterning of compound leaves and leaf serration.


Plant Direct ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. e00103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter DiGennaro ◽  
Etienne Grienenberger ◽  
Thai Q. Dao ◽  
Ji Hyung Jun ◽  
Jennifer C. Fletcher

Gene ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 677 ◽  
pp. 280-288
Author(s):  
Qin-Mei Wang ◽  
Jianguo Cui ◽  
Hongyan Dai ◽  
Yongbin Zhou ◽  
Na Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document