Abstract. As an important solar radiation absorbing aerosol, the effect of black carbon
(BC) on surface ozone, via reducing photolysis rate, has been widely
discussed by “offline” model studies. However, BC–boundary layer (BL)
interactions also influence surface ozone. Using the “online” model
simulations and process analysis, we demonstrate the significant impact of
BC–BL interaction on surface ozone in Nanjing. The absorbing effect of BC
heats the air above the BL and suppresses and delays the development of the BL,
which eventually leads to a change in surface ozone via a change in the
contributions from chemical and physical processes (photochemistry, vertical
mixing and advection). For chemical processes, the suppression of the BL leads to
large amounts of ozone precursors being confined below the BL which has an
increased effect on ozone chemical production and offsets the decrease
caused by the reduction of the photolysis rate, thus enhancing ozone chemical
formation from 10:00 to 12:00 LT. Furthermore, changes in physical processes,
especially the vertical mixing process, show a more significant influence on
surface ozone. The weakened turbulence, caused by the suppressed BL, entrains
much less ozone aloft down to the surface. Finally, summing-up the changes in
the processes, surface ozone reduces before noon and the maximum reduction
reaches 16.4 ppb at 12:00 LT. In the afternoon, the changes in chemical process
are small which inconspicuously influence surface ozone. However,
change in the vertical mixing process still influences surface ozone
significantly. Due to the delayed development of the BL, there are obvious
ozone gradients around the top of BL. Therefore, high concentrations of ozone
aloft can still be entrained down to the surface which offsets the reduction
of surface ozone. Comparing the changes in the processes, the change in
vertical mixing plays the most important role in impacting surface ozone. Our
results highlight the great impacts BC–BL interactions have on surface ozone
by influencing the ozone contribution from physical process. This suggests
that more attention should be paid to the mechanism of aerosol–BL
interactions when controlling ozone pollution.