Seismic loss assessment of seismically isolated buildings designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7-16

This paper investigates the seismic loss assessment of seismically isolated and non-isolated buildings with steel moment or braced frames, designed by the seismic design standard of ASCE/SEI 7-16. The seismic loss is calculated from the damage to structural and non-structural components, as well as the demolition and the collapse of buildings. This study demonstrates that the expected annual losses for seismically isolated buildings are half or less than half of those calculated for non-isolated buildings. These losses depend on the types of seismic isolation systems and seismic force resisting systems used. Among the cases of isolated buildings studied in this paper, the most cost-effective systems are found to be the buildings designed by minimum strength requirement in ASCE/SEI 7-16 and with isolators which have displacement capacity 1.5 times larger than the minimum required in ASCE/SEI 7-16, in terms of expected annual losses. This study also compares the results obtained from different approaches of selection and scaling of ground motions. The following research finds that when Incremental Dynamic Analysis approach with far-field ground motion set in FEMA P695 is used, the computed expected total annual losses become doubled from the Conditional Spectra approach.

Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area

Design ground motion intensities determine the actions for which structures are checked, in the conventional approach of seismic codes, not to fail the target performances. On the other hand, due to inherent characteristics of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), it is expected that site-specific design intensity based on PSHA is exceeded in the epicentral area of moderate-to-high magnitude earthquakes. In the context of regional seismic loss assessment and of the evolution of seismic codes from the regulator perspective, it is useful to gather insights about the extent of the zone around the earthquake source where code-conforming structures are expected to be systematically exposed to seismic actions larger than those accounted for in design. To assess such areal extent based on empirical evidence is the scope of the study presented in the paper. To this aim, peak ground acceleration ShakeMap data for Italian earthquakes from 2008 to 2020 were compared to the current design intensities in the same areas for which the maps are available. This allowed, first, to develop simple semi-empirical models of the exceedance area versus the magnitude of the earthquakes. Second, it allowed to model the probability that an earthquake of given magnitude causes exceedance of the design intensity via logistic regressions. Coupling the first and second class of models provides an approximation of the expected exceedance (logarithmic) area upon occurrence of an earthquake of given magnitude. Such an area can be of several thousand square kilometers for earthquakes occurring relatively frequently in countries such as Italy.

Probabilistic Seismic Loss Assessment of RC High-Rise Buildings in Southern Euro-Mediterranean Zone

In this paper probabilistic seismic loss assessment of RC high rise-buildings for seismic excitation typical for Southern Euro-Mediterranean zone is presented. The loss assessment methodology developed in paper is based on a comprehensive simulation approach which takes into account ground motion (GM) uncertainty, the random effects in seismic demand as well as in predicting the damage states (DSs). The methodology is implemented on three RC high-rise buildings of 20-story, 30-story and 40-story with core wall structural system designed according to Eurocode 8. The loss functions described by a cumulative lognormal probability distribution are obtained for two intensity level for a large set of simulations (non-linear time-history analyses) based on 60 GM records with wide range of magnitudes, distance to source and different site soil conditions. The losses expressed in percent of building replacement cost for RC high-rise buildings are obtained. In the estimation of losses, both structural (S) and non-structural (NS) damage for four DSs are considered. The effect of different GM characteristics (magnitude, distance to source and site soil condition) on the obtained losses are investigated. It is checked if the estimated performance of the RC high-rise buildings fulfill limit state requirements according to Eurocode 8.

Simplified seismic loss assessment for optimal structural retrofit of RC buildings

This study deals with selecting optimal seismic retrofit solutions for reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. To this aim, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is implemented explicitly considering earthquake-induced economic loss as a decision criterion. Fragility (i.e. likelihood of damage levels vs intensity measure ( IM) levels) and vulnerability (i.e. likelihood of loss levels vs IM levels) relationships are derived by using three increasingly refined analysis methods: Simple Lateral Mechanism Analysis; numerical pushover; time-history analysis. A seismically deficient RC school index building, with construction details typical of developing countries, is used for illustrative purposes. Concrete jacketing, addition of concrete walls, and addition of steel braces are the considered retrofit alternatives. Intensity-based expected loss and expected annual loss are adopted in the MCDM, among other criteria, independently derived with the three analysis methods. It is shown that, given the adopted loss-analysis methodology, the ranking of the retrofit alternatives is insensitive to both analysis methods and loss metrics, even when the weight for the seismic loss criterion is high. These findings suggest that simplified methods can be effectively employed in the conceptual/preliminary design of retrofit alternatives.