Testing the effect of an integrated-intervention to promote access to sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights among women with disabilities in Ghana: a quasi-experimental study protocol

Background There is evidence that women with disabilities (WWDs) experience the most difficulty accessing and using sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHRs) services and information worldwide. However, there are currently no workable interventions to reach WWDs with essential SRHR services. This study aims to test the effect of an integrated health facility and individual-level intervention on access to SRHRs information and services among sexually active WWDs aged 15–49 years in Ghana. Methods A quasi-experimental study design with four arms will be implemented in four districts in the Northern region of Ghana to test the effect of three inter-related interventions. The inventions are (1) capacity building in disability-centred SRHRs information and service delivery for healthcare providers, (2) support for WWDs to access disability-unfriendly healthcare infrastructure, and (3) one-on-one regular SRHRs education, information provision, and referral. The first two interventions are at the health-facility level while the third one is at the individual/family level. The first arm of the experiment will expose eligible WWDs to all three interventions. In the second arm, WWDs will be exposed to only the two-health facility-level interventions. The third arm will expose WWDs to only the individual level intervention. The forth arm will constitute the control group. A total of 680 (170 in each arm) sexually active women with physical disability and visual impairments will take part in the study over a period of 12 months. To assess the effect of the interventions on key study outcomes (i.e. awareness about, and use of modern contraceptive, ANC attendance, and skilled delivery among parous women), pre- and post-intervention surveys will be conducted. Difference-in-Difference analysis will be used to examine the effect of each intervention in comparison to the control group, while controlling for confounders. Cost-effectiveness analyses will also be conducted on the three-intervention arms vis a vis changes in key outcome measures to identify which of the three interventions is likely to yield greater impact with lower costs. Discussion Lack of access to SRHRs information and services for WWDs is not only a violation of their right to appropriate and quality SRH care but could also undermine efforts to achieve equitable healthcare access as envisaged under SDG 3. This research is expected to generate evidence to inform local health programmes to increase access to SRHRs among WWDs by strengthening local health system capacity to provide disability-sensitive SRHRs services. Trial registration Name of the registry: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR). Trial ID: 14591. Date of registration: 02/01/2020. URL of trial registry record: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/Researcher/TrialRegister.aspx?TrialID=14591

Electronic surveillance system for COVID-19 virus management in Palestine- an observational study

This research investigated the performance of the electronic surveillance system of COVID 19 and assessed its key attributes. The research results for the overall system performance were good (82.81%). The highest attribute score was 100% for representativeness and data completeness and the lowest score was 75.30% for acceptability. The COVID-19 surveillance system is generally simple and accepted by users, although the instability of electricity and the Internet, the benefit from the training on the system, and the lack of willingness to participate in the system at the health facility level had the greatest impact on simplicity and acceptability scores. The quality and completeness of the data enabled stakeholders to carry out the most effective prevention and control activities. System developers indicated that the system has achieved the desired benefit, due to the flexibility and stability of the system and comprehensiveness of geographical coverage.

Safer primary healthcare facilities are needed to protect healthcare workers and maintain essential services: lessons learned from a multicountry COVID-19 emergency response initiative

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of infection from SARS-CoV-2 and other disease pathogens, which take a disproportionate toll on HCWs, with substantial cost to health systems. Improved infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes can protect HCWs, especially in resource-limited settings where the health workforce is scarcest, and ensure patient safety and continuity of essential health services. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we collaborated with ministries of health and development partners to implement an emergency initiative for HCWs at the primary health facility level in 22 African countries. Between April 2020 and January 2021, the initiative trained 42 058 front-line HCWs from 8444 health facilities, supported longitudinal supervision and monitoring visits guided by a standardised monitoring tool, and provided resources including personal protective equipment (PPE). We documented significant short-term improvements in IPC performance, but gaps remain. Suspected HCW infections peaked at 41.5% among HCWs screened at monitored facilities in July 2020 during the first wave of the pandemic in Africa. Disease-specific emergency responses are not the optimal approach. Comprehensive, sustainable IPC programmes are needed. IPC needs to be incorporated into all HCW training programmes and combined with supportive supervision and mentorship. Strengthened data systems on IPC are needed to guide improvements at the health facility level and to inform policy development at the national level, along with investments in infrastructure and sustainable supplies of PPE. Multimodal strategies to improve IPC are critical to make health facilities safer and to protect HCWs and the communities they serve.

Continuous quality improvement as a tool to implement evidence-informed problem solving: experiences from the district and health facility level in Uganda

Background Continuous quality improvement processes in health care were developed for use at health facility level, and that is where they have been used the most, often addressing defined care processes. However, in different settings different factors have been important to support institutionalization. This study explores how continuous quality improvement processes were institutionalized at the district level and at the health facility level in Uganda. Methods This qualitative study was carried out in seven districts in Uganda. Semi-structured interviews with key informants from the district health management teams and document review were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results All districts that participated in the study formed Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) teams both at the district level and at the health facilities. The district CQI teams comprised of members from different departments within the district health office. District level CQI teams were mandated to take the lead in addressing management gaps and follow up CQI activities at the health facility level. Acceptability of quality improvement processes by the district leadership was identified across districts as supporting the successful implementation of CQI. However, high turnover of staff at health facility level was also reported as a detrimental to the successful implementation of quality improvement processes. Also the district health management teams did not engage much in addressing their own roles using continuous quality improvement. Conclusion The leadership and management provided by the district health management team was an important factor for the use of Continuous Quality Improvement principles within the district. The key roles of the district health team revolved around the institutionalisation of CQI at different levels of the health system, monitoring results of continuous quality improvement implementation, mobilising resources and health care delivery hence promoting the culture of quality, direct implementation of CQI, and creating an enabling environment for the lower-level health facilities to engage in CQI. High turnover of staff at health facility level was also reported as one of the challenges to the successful implementation of continuous quality improvement. The DHT did not engage much in addressing gaps in their own roles using continuous quality improvement.

Testing The Effect of an Integrated-Intervention To Promote Access to Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare and Rights Among Women With Disabilities In Ghana: A Quasi-Experimental Study Protocol

Background: There is evidence that women with disabilities (WWDs) experience the most difficulty accessing and using sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHRs) services and information worldwide. However, there are currently no workable interventions to reach WWDs with essential SRHR services. This study aims to test the effect of an integrated health facility and individual-level intervention on access to SRHRs information and services among sexually active WWDs aged 15-49years in Ghana. Methods: A quasi-experimental study design with four arms will be implemented in four districts in the Northern region of Ghana to test the effect of three inter-related interventions. The inventions are (1) capacity building in disability-centred SRHRs information and service delivery for healthcare providers, (2) support for WWDs to access disability-unfriendly healthcare infrastructure, and (3) one-on-one regular SRHRs education, information provision, and referral. The first two interventions are at the health-facility level while the third one is at the individual/family level. The first arm of the experiment will expose eligible WWDs to all three interventions. In the second arm, WWDs will be exposed to only the two-health facility-level interventions. The third arm will expose WWDs to only the individual level intervention. The forth arm will constitute the control group. A total of 680 (170 in each arm) sexually active women with physical disability and visual impairments will take part in the study over a period of 12months. To assess the effect of the interventions on key study outcomes (i.e. awareness about, and use of modern contraceptive, ANC attendance, and skilled delivery among parous women), pre- and post-intervention surveys will be conducted. Difference-in-Difference analysis will be used to examine the effect of each intervention in comparison to the control group, while controlling for effect modifiers. Cost-effectiveness analyses will also be conducted on the three-intervention arms vis a vis changes in key outcome measures to identify which of the three interventions is likely to yield greater impact with lower costs. Discussion: Lack of access to SRHRs information and services for WWDs is not only a violation of their right to appropriate and quality SRH care but could also undermine efforts to achieve equitable healthcare access as envisaged under SDG 3. This research is expected to generate evidence to inform local health programmes to increase access to SRHRs among WWDs by strengthening local health system capacity to provide disability-sensitive SRHRs services.

Estimating the effect of pretreatment loss to follow up on TB associated mortality at public health facilities in Uganda

Introduction Tuberculosis (TB) mortality estimates derived only from cohorts of patients initiated on TB treatment do not consider outcomes of patients with pretreatment loss to follow-up (LFU). We aimed to assess the effect of pretreatment LFU on TB-associated mortality in the six months following TB diagnosis at public health facilities in Uganda. Methods At ten public health facilities, we retrospectively reviewed treatment data for all patients with a positive Xpert®MTB/RIF test result from January to June 2018. Pretreatment LFU was defined as not initiating TB treatment within two weeks of a positive test. We traced patients with pretreatment LFU to ascertain their vital status. We performed Kaplan Meier survival analysis to compare the cumulative incidence of mortality, six months after diagnosis among patients who did and did not experience pretreatment LFU. We also determined the health facility level estimates of TB associated mortality before and after incorporating deaths prior to treatment initiation among patients who experienced pretreatment LFU. Results Of 510 patients with positive test, 100 (19.6%) experienced pretreatment LFU. Of these, we ascertained the vital status of 49 patients. In the six months following TB diagnosis, mortality was higher among patients who experienced pretreatment LFU 48.1/1000py vs 22.9/1000py. Hazard ratio [HR] 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.61–6.30). After incorporating deaths prior to treatment initation among patients who experienced pretreatment LFU, health facility level estimates of TB associated mortality increased from 8.4% (95% CI 6.1%-11.6%) to 10.2% (95% CI 7.7%-13.4%). Conclusion Patients with confirmed TB who experience pretreatment LFU have high mortality within the first six months. Efforts should be made to prioritise linkage to treatment for this group of patients. Deaths that occur prior to treatment initation should be included when reporting TB mortality in order to more accurately reflect the health impact of TB.

Evaluation of the Zimbabwe HIV Case Surveillance Pilot Program, 2019 (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Zimbabwe has a high burden of HIV, with an estimated 1.3 million people living with the virus and an HIV prevalence and incidence of 13.8% and 0.48%, respectively (2017 Spectrum estimates). In 2017, the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care (MOHCC) developed and implemented a pilot of HIV case surveillance (CS) based on the 2017 World Health Organisation (WHO) Person-centred HIV patient monitoring (PM) and case surveillance guidelines. As the case surveillance guidelines were new, lessons learned from field implementation experiences were intended to inform the development of HIV case surveillance implementation guidance and tools. OBJECTIVE At the end of the pilot phase, the Ministry of Health and Child Care (MOHCC) commissioned an evaluation to inform further steps. METHODS Two districts, Umzingwane in Matabeleland South Province and Mutare in Manicaland Province were commissioned to run the CS pilot from August 2017 to December 2018. During this period, 1602 people living with HIV (PLHIV) newly diagnosed with HIV were reported in the CS system, while other HIV sentinel events, including ART initiation and first viral load test, were routinely reported. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study of stakeholders and health facility staff was used to assess the following CS system features: design and operations, performance, usefulness, sustainability and scalability. A total of 13 stakeholders responded to an online questionnaire, while 33 health facility respondents were interviewed in 11 health facilities in the two pilot districts. RESULTS The HIV CS system was adequately designed for Zimbabwe’s context, integrated within existing health information systems at the facility level. However, the training was minimal, and an opportunity to train the data entry clerks in data analysis was missed. The system performed well in terms of surveillance and informatics attributes. However, viral load test results return was a significant problem. The system was used at the health facility level to track the HIV positive clients in their catchment area; all facilities that were visited were aware of what is happening to their clients. Almost all respondents believed that the country can roll out the HIV CS system to all facilities with partner support. CONCLUSIONS The HIV CS system was found useful at the health facility level and should be rolled out in a phased manner, beginning with all facilities in Manicaland and Matabeleland South provinces. An electronic link needs to be made between the health facilities and the laboratory to reduce viral load test results delays. Lessons learned from the provincial roll out can be used for a nationwide scale-up.

Measles surveillance system Evaluation in Benishangul Gumuz, Mandura woreda, Ethiopia in 2018

Objective The main objective of this study is to Evaluate measles surveillance system in Benishangul Gumuz, Mandura woreda, Ethiopia in 2018. Result The weekly reporting rates of the health facilities over the past 52 weeks of 2018 were >80% timeliness and completeness as show below by line graph for health posts. All the weekly surveillance reports were sent to the next level via report format and telephone. Mandura Woreda administration has made major progress in tackling the spread of measles. The overall structural set up of the surveillance system in creation of responsible unit /focal person of Public Health Emergency Management at each district and health facility level is good.