High Performance Accelerated Tests to Evaluate Hard Cr Replacements for Hydraulic Cylinders

To prolong the lifetime of hydraulic cylinders, a wear-resistant low-friction surface is required. Until now, hard Cr coatings were the best materials for this. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing pressure on the manufacturing of hard Cr plating and plated products, because of environmental and health hazards. The replacement of these coatings by alternatives has not been highly successful yet, because it requires extensive component testing, which is costly and time-consuming and thus not appropriate for material development. For this reason, there is a high need to develop tribological methods that simulate hydraulic cylinders’ component-testing closely. In addition, these new methods should also provide additional information (e.g., friction evolution) that can assist in the further development and optimization of alternative coatings. Having the above in mind and building on an existing method from the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM G133), a new test method that allows users to test directly on hydraulic cylinders was developed. This method can provide a relative ranking of both the wear resistance and frictional performance of alternative coatings in direct comparison to state-of-the-art hard Cr. Importantly, the method is repeatable and has a much shorter test duration than full-scale component tests, thereby accelerating material development significantly.

The Application of Simulation Based Product Development Practices

The use of simulation-based process modeling tools with the intent of reducing iterative physical component testing and process development costs when designing new components was investigated. Several processing and testing phases were simulated to generate physical properties and geometries which could then be compared against how physical components put through the same processes reacted. These comparisons were repeated over several trials to validate their results. A good correlation between simulation and physical component response was found, and that iterative simulations could reliably be used in place of iterative physical component testing.

Development, Crash Testing, and Evaluation of Steel-Post Trailing-End Guardrail Anchorage System

Trailing-end guardrail anchorage systems are widely used by most state departments of transportation (DOTs) and generally consist of simple adaptations of crashworthy end terminals. The safety performance and structural capacity of these trailing-end anchorage systems, when reverse-direction impacts occur near the end, is imperative in crashworthiness of guardrail systems. In 2013, a non-proprietary trailing-end anchorage system with a modified breakaway cable terminal (BCT) was developed by the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) for the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS). Although this trailing-end guardrail anchorage system adequately met the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) TL-3 safety requirements, the use of two breakaway wood posts was deemed by some users to have several drawbacks. Thus, there was a critical need to develop a non-wood option to anchor the downstream end of the W-beam guardrail system, which led to the need to develop a steel-post trailing-end guardrail anchorage system for use with the MGS. Following the design and component testing of such a system, two full-scale crash tests were performed according to the MASH 2016 test designation nos. 3-37a and 3-37b. In the first test, a 2270P pickup truck struck the guardrail system and was adequately contained and redirected. In the second test, an 1100C small car struck the barrier and safely gated through the barrier. Both tests were deemed acceptable according to TL-3 safety criteria in MASH 2016. Recommendations are provided for the installation of a steel-post trailing-end guardrail anchorage system when used in combination with MGS.

A Modular Experimentation Methodology for 5G Deployments: The 5GENESIS Approach

The high heterogeneity of 5G use cases requires the extension of the traditional per-component testing procedures provided by certification organizations, in order to devise and incorporate methodologies that cover the testing requirements from vertical applications and services. In this paper, we introduce an experimentation methodology that is defined in the context of the 5GENESIS project, which aims at enabling both the testing of network components and validation of E2E KPIs. The most important contributions of this methodology are its modularity and flexibility, as well as the open-source software that was developed for its application, which enable lightweight adoption of the methodology in any 5G testbed. We also demonstrate how the methodology can be used, by executing and analyzing different experiments in a 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) deployment at the University of Malaga. The key findings of the paper are an initial 5G performance assessment and KPI analysis and the detection of under-performance issues at the application level. Those findings highlight the need for reliable testing and validation procedures towards a fair benchmarking of generic 5G services and applications.

Measurement of Sit-Stand Desk Usage by Desk-Mounted Sensors

Quantifying user behaviors at sit-stand desks is critical to understanding the efficacy of these workstations to reduce exposures to prolonged sitting or standing. A custom after-market desk-mounted sensor predicting sit-stand desk use by measuring desk floor heights, desk user distances, and the temperature in front of the desk was tested. We performed sensor component testing, a survey of desk height ranges, and a logistic model to estimate gross posture and user presence with a 95.6% accuracy rate. This approach can aid researchers and ergonomists in understanding sit-stand desk use in the field, with the end goal of reducing sedentary work activities.