1650 Is There a Place for Medical Students at Organ Retrieval? 4 Years’ Experience at a Single Centre

Aim Medical students at a hospital with a national organ retrieval service (NORS) had the unique opportunity to attend organ retrieval. This retrospective survey investigated how attendance affected students’ desire to pursue a career in surgery, and what they learnt from the experience. Method Clinical medical students were invited to sign-up to shifts with the regional NORS team. If notified of a potential organ donation event the NORS co-ordinator would inform the medical student, who would then join the retrieval team and travel with them to the donation site. An electronic survey was later distributed to students, whether or not the donation proceeded. This survey collected both quantitative and qualitative information about the students’ experiences. Results 51 responses were collected from students who attended proceeding organ donations between January 2015 and October 2019. 100% of students found it a useful learning experience and would recommend it to their peers. 98% were able to scrub in for the retrieval procedure. Common learning points were improved understanding of the process of organ retrieval (n = 34), and anatomy (n = 15). Following experience of organ retrieval 59% reported being more likely to pursue a career in transplant surgery and 69% reported being more likely to pursue any surgical career. Conclusions Medical students should be included in organ retrieval, as it not only benefits their learning, but also increases interest in surgical careers. Given that only two out of the sixteen UK NORS teams involve medical students currently, there is scope for much greater adoption of student retrieval rotas.

Clinical impact of implementing humidified high-flow nasal cannula on interhospital transport among children admitted to a PICU with respiratory distress: a cohort study

Background There is a limited evidence for humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) use on inter-hospital transport. Despite this, its use during transport is increasing in children with respiratory distress worldwide. In 2015 HHFNC was implemented on a specialized pediatric retrieval team serving for Victoria. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the HHFNC implementation on the retrieval team on the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) length of stay and respiratory support use. Methods We performed a cohort study using a comparative interrupted time-series approach controlling for patient and temporal covariates, and population-adjusted analysis. We studied 3022 children admitted to a PICU in Victoria with respiratory distress January 2010–December 2019. Patients were divided in pre-intervention era (2010–2014) and post-intervention era (2015–2019). Results 1006 children following interhospital transport and 2016 non-transport children were included. Median (IQR) age was 1.4 (0.7–4.5) years. Pneumonia (39.1%) and bronchiolitis (34.3%) were common. On retrieval, HHFNC was used in 5.0% (21/420) and 45.9% (269/586) in pre- and post-intervention era. In an unadjusted model, median (IQR) PICU length of stay was 2.2 (1.1–4.2) and 1.7 (0.9–3.2) days in the pre- and post-intervention era in transported children while the figures were 2.4 (1.3–4.9) and 2.1 (1.2–4.5) days in non-transport children. In the multivariable regression model, the intervention was associated with the reduced PICU length of stay (ratio 0.64, 95% confidential interval 0.49–0.83, p = 0.001) with the predicted reduction of PICU length of stay being − 10.6 h (95% confidential interval − 16.9 to − 4.3 h), and decreased respiratory support use (− 25.1 h, 95% confidential interval − 47.9 to − 2.3 h, p = 0.03). Sensitivity analyses including a model excluding less severe children showed similar results. In population-adjusted analyses, respiratory support use decreased from 4837 to 3477 person-hour per year in transported children over the study era, while the reduction was 594 (from 9553 to 8959) person-hour per year in non-transport children. With regard to the safety, there were no escalations of respiratory support mode during interhospital transport. Conclusions The implementation of HHFNC on interhospital transport was associated with the reduced PICU length of stay and respiratory support use among PICU admissions with respiratory distress.

The use of dual oxygen concentrator system for mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 pandemic in Sabah, Malaysia

Sabah in Malaysian Borneo is among the Malaysian states which reported a high number of detected COVID-19 cases during the current pandemic. Due to geographical challenges and limited resources, clinicians developed novel strategies for managing patients. The use of a dual oxygen concentrator system for mechanical ventilation is one of the innovations developed by retrieval team members from the Emergency Department (ED) of the Sabah Women and Children’s Hospital. Due to conditions requiring isolation of patients suspected of or positive for COVID-19, high-risk patients were treated in an ED extension area that lacked central wall oxygen. Direct access to oxygen tanks became the only viable option, but ensuring a continuous supply was laborious. The novel setup described within this paper has been used on intubated patients in the ED extension area with moderate to high ventilator settings successfully. This simple setup, designed to meet the limited resources within a pandemic environment, needed only a turbine-driven ventilator, two oxygen concentrators, a 3-way connector, and three oxygen tubing. The application of this setup could potentially save more critically ill patients who are being managed in resource-limited conditions such as in smaller district hospitals or out in the field.

Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool

ObjectiveThe use of specialist retrieval teams to transport critically ill children is associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; however, there is a paucity of data to guide decision-making related to retrieval team activation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a novel triage tool designed to identify critically ill children at the time of referral for interhospital transport.DesignProspective observational study.SettingRegional paediatric retrieval and transport services.PatientsData were collected for 1815 children referred consecutively for interhospital transport from 87 hospitals in Queensland and northern New South Wales.InterventionImplementation of the Queensland Paediatric Transport Triage Tool.Main outcome measuresAccuracy was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for predicting transport by a retrieval team, or admission to intensive care following transport.ResultsA total of 574 (32%) children were transported with a retrieval team. Prediction of retrieval (95% CIs): sensitivity 96.9% (95% CI 95.1% to 98.1%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 89.7% to 92.9%), negative predictive value 98.4% (95% CI 97.5% to 99.1%). There were 412 (23%) children admitted to intensive care following transport. Prediction of intensive care admission: sensitivity 96.8% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), specificity 81.2% (95% CI 79.0% to 83.2%), negative predictive value 98.9% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.4%).ConclusionsThe triage tool predicted the need for retrieval or intensive care admission with high sensitivity and specificity. The high negative predictive value indicates that, in our setting, children categorised as acutely ill rather than critically ill are generally suitable for interhospital transport without a retrieval team.

Helicopter transport of critical care COVID-19 patients in the Netherlands: protection against COVID-19 exposure-a challenge to critical care retrieval personnel in a novel operation

Background During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the Netherlands, the demand for intensive care beds exceeded availability within days. Initially, patients were redistributed regionally by ground transport. When transport over longer distances became necessary, we initiated a new Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) operation. We hypothesize that the transport of contagious COVID-19 patients is feasible and safe for patients and HEMS personnel. Methods In this retrospective, single-centre observational study, flight and monitor data were used to calculate the exposure time of the retrieval team to COVID-19 patients. All the crew members (n = 18) were instructed on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), dressing and undressing routine using buddy check supervision and cleaning procedures. All the team members were monitored for possible COVID-19 symptoms, as advised by our National Institute for Health and Environment. One month after completing the aeromedical transport all crew members were asked to donate a blood sample which was examined for the presence of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Results From March 24 to May 25, 2020 the HEMS team transported 67 ventilated critical care COVID-19 patients. The exposure time was 7451 min (124 h and 11 min). One HEMS member reported pneumonia 6 weeks before the start of the patient transport. He tested positive for IgG SARS-CoV-2 by serology testing. We speculate that he was infected before the start of the operation; irrefutable evidence is lacking to support this claim because we did not perform serology testing before this operation started. Conclusion Occupational COVID-19 exposure during helicopter transport of ventilated critical care COVID-19 patients can be performed safely when proper PPE is applied.