Investigation on the Effect of Probability Distribution on the Dynamic Response of Liquefiable Soils

This study investigated the effect of different probabilistic distributions (Lognormal, Gamma, and Beta) to characterize the spatial variability of shear modulus on the soil liquefiable response. The parameter sensitivity analysis included the coefficient of variation and scale of fluctuation of soil shear modulus. The results revealed that the distribution type had no significant influence on the liquefication zone. In particular, the estimation with Beta distribution is the worst scenario. It illuminated that the estimation with Beta distribution can provide a conservative design if site investigation is absent.

An approach for modelling spatial variability in permeability of cement-admixed soil

This paper presents a framework for modelling the random variation in permeability in cement-admixed soil based on the binder content variation and thereby relating the coefficient of permeability to the unconfined compressive strength of a cement-admixed clay. The strength–permeability relationship was subsequently implemented in random finite element method (RFEM). The effects of spatial variation in both strength and permeability of cement-admixed clays in RFEM is illustrated using two examples concerning one-dimensional consolidation. Parametric studies considering different coefficient of variation and scale of fluctuation configurations were performed. Results show that spatial variability of the cement-admixed clay considering variable permeability can significantly influence the overall consolidation rate, especially when the soil strength variability is high. However, the overall consolidation rates also depend largely on the prescribed scales of fluctuation; in cases where the variation is horizontally layered, stagnation in pore pressure dissipation may occur due to soft parts yielding.

Influence of Soil Heterogeneity on the Contact Problems in Geotechnical Engineering

Contact problems are widely encountered in geotechnical engineering, such as the contact between soils and concrete used in earth and rockfill dams, tunnels and coastal levees. Due to the unknown contact region and contact forces, the contact problems have strong boundary nonlinearity. In addition, soils have been recognized as heterogeneous materials in geotechnical engineering. The existence of the soil heterogeneity increases the nonlinearity of the contact problems. Currently, the contact problems are mostly analysed without considering the soil heterogeneity, which may not reflect the contact behavior well. In order to investigate the influence of soil heterogeneity on the contact problems, in this paper, a simple plane-strain contact problem is analysed as an example. In this example, Young’s modulus is taken to be a spatially variable. The local average subdivision (LAS) is used to model the heterogeneity of Young’s modulus. The penalty method is utilised to determine the contact behavior. By the first use of linking the penalty method with the LAS, the proposed approach can be used to analyse the contact problems considering soil heterogeneity. The results show that the influence of soil heterogeneity on the elastic contact problems is significant. The contact forces of the heterogeneous case present apparent variation compared to the results of the homogeneous case. The distribution of the contact force at a specific point is also normal when Young’s modulus is normally distributed, moreover, the coefficient of variation (COV) and the horizontal scale of fluctuation of Young’s modulus affect the extent of variation of the normal contact forces. The standard deviation of the normal contact force increases with the increase of the COV and decreases with the increase of the horizontal scale of fluctuation of Young’s modulus. From the analyses, to better predict the deformation/stress in the contact problems, heterogeneity needs to be considered.

Probabilistic Bearing Capacity of a Pavement Resting on Fibre Reinforced Embankment Considering Soil Spatial Variability

This paper intends to examine the influence of spatial variability of soil properties on the probabilistic bearing capacity of a pavement located on the crest of a fibre reinforced embankment. An anisotropic random field, in combination with the finite difference method, is used to carry out the probabilistic analyses. The cohesion and internal friction angle of the soil are assumed to be lognormally distributed. The Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to obtain the mean and coefficient of variation of the pavement bearing capacity. The mean bearing capacity of the pavement is found to decrease with the increase in horizontal scale of fluctuation for a constant vertical scale of fluctuation; whereas, the coefficient of variation of the bearing capacity increases with the increase in horizontal scale of fluctuation. However, both the mean and coefficient of variation of bearing capacity of the pavement are observed to be increasing with the increase in vertical scale of fluctuation for a constant horizontal scale of fluctuation. Apart from the different scales of fluctuation, the effects of out of the plane length of the embankment and randomness in soil properties on the probabilistic bearing capacity are also investigated in the present study.

ARMA Models to Measure the Scale of Fluctuation from CPT Data

Objective: Spatial variability is one of the largest sources of uncertainty in geotechnical applications. This variability is primarily characterized by the scale of fluctuation, a parameter that describes the distance over which the parameters of a material are similar. Spatial variability is generally described with traditional methods of time series analysis. In statistics, the Auto-Regressive Moving Average (ARMA) model is commonly used to describe the relationship between two points in time. Instead of assuming an autocorrelation model, the ARMA model calculates the necessary auto-regressive components (AR), as well as a decaying Mean Structure (MA). The advantage of this method is that it is calculated for each specific field study, so that the data is not forced to fit into a fixed autocorrelation model (e.g. Markovian, Gaussian, etc). Methods: In this study, the ARMA model is introduced as a means of measuring scale of fluctuation, and two case studies and a simulation are used to compare the scale of fluctuation values from the ARMA model to the other estimates. Results: In the first case study, the ARMA model estimated a value of 0.26 m while the other methods ranged from 0.22-0.29 m. In the second case study, the ARMA model estimated a value of 0.40 m while the other methods ranged from 0.40-0.54 m. In the simulated example, where the true value was 5.0 m, the ARMA model estimated a value of 4.73 m while the other methods ranged from 3.24-3.51 m. Conclusion: This paper concludes that ARMA is a promising new method for estimating the scale of fluctuation but requires a considerable amount of research before it can become established in the geotechnical sphere.