hydrogen recovery
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

146
(FIVE YEARS 37)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2022 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 111753
Author(s):  
Gabriel J. Gotama ◽  
Akihiro Hayakawa ◽  
Ekenechukwu C. Okafor ◽  
Ryuhei Kanoshima ◽  
Masao Hayashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemens Katterbauer ◽  
Abdulaziz Qasim ◽  
Alberto Marsala ◽  
Ali Yousef

Abstract Hydrogen has become a very promising green energy source that can be easily stored and transported, and it has the potential to be utilized in a variety of applications. Hydrogen, as a power source, has the benefits of being easily transportable and stored over long periods of times, and does not lead to any carbon emissions related to the utilization of the power source. Thermal EOR methods are among the most commonly used recovery methods. They involve the introduction of thermal energy or heat into the reservoir to raise the temperature of the oil and reduce its viscosity. The heat makes the oil mobile and assists in moving it towards the producer wells. The heat can be added externally by injecting a hot fluid such as steam or hot water into the formations, or it can be generated internally through in-situ combustion by burning the oil in depleted gas or waterflooded reservoirs using air or oxygen. This method is an attractive alternative to produce cost-efficiently significant amounts of hydrogen from these depleted or waterflooded reservoirs. A major challenge is to optimize injection of air/oxygen to maximize hydrogen production via ensuring that the in-situ combustion sufficiently supports the breakdown of water into hydrogen molecules. In-situ combustion or fireflood is a method consisting of volumes of air or oxygen injected into a well and ignited. A burning zone is propagated through the reservoir from the injection well to the producing wells. The in-situ combustion creates a bank of steam, gas from the combustion process, and evaporated hydrocarbons that drive the reservoir oil into the producing wells. There are three types of in-situ combustion processes: dry forward, dry reverse and wet forward combustion. In a dry forward process only air is injected and the combustion front moves from the injector to the producer. The wet forward injection is the same process where air and water are injected either simultaneously or alternating. Artificial intelligence (AI) practices have allowed to significantly improve optimization of reservoir production, based on observations in the near wellbore reservoir layers. This work utilizes a data-driven physics-inspired AI model for the optimization of hydrogen recovery via the injection of oxygen, where the injection and production parameters are optimized, minimizing oxygen injection while maximizing hydrogen production and recovery. Multiple physical and data-driven models and their parameters are optimized based on observations with the objective to determine the best sustainable combination. The framework was examined on a synthetic reservoir model with multiple injector and producing wells. Historical injection and production were available for a time period of three years for various oxygen injection and hydrogen production levels. Various time-series deep learning network models were investigated, with random forest time series models incorporating a modified mass balance – reaction kinetics model for in-situ combustion performing most effectively. A robust global optimization approach, based on an artificial intelligence genetic optimization, allows for simultaneously optimization of an injection pattern and uncertainty quantification. Results indicate potential for significant reduction in required oxygen injection volumes, while maximizing hydrogen recovery. This work represents a first and innovative approach to enhance hydrogen recovery from waterflooded reservoirs via oxygen injection. The data-driven physics inspired AI genetic optimization framework allows to optimize oxygen injection while maximizing hydrogen production.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moein Jahanbani ◽  
Hamidreza M. Nick ◽  
Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Kiapi ◽  
Ali Mahmoodi

Hydrogen storage is a key component in realization of an emission free future. Depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs offer a low cost medium for large-scale hydrogen storage. While the effect of hydrogen in triggering some chemical and biochemical reactions has stablished some screening criteria to choose a suitable underground storage site according to reservoir geochemistry, there is no screening criteria based on the effect of variables such as pressure, temperature and composition of the residual hydrocarbon on hydrogen recovery. In this work, we first investigate the cost required for hydrogen compression in terms of the work required for compressors. Then we investigate the effect of reservoir pressure, storage pressure, reservoir temperature and residual composition on hydrogen recovery. Our results show that on one hand the work required for pressurizing hydrogen does not increase linearly with pressure, and on the other hand, hydrogen recovery increases with storage pressure. Additionally, Hydrogen recovery was shown to decrease by increase in reservoir initial pressure before hydrogen storage. Therefore, it seems that hydrogen storage will be more efficient if it is conducted at the highest possible pressure in a reservoir with low initial pressure (either a shallow reservoir, or a depleted reservoir). Our results did not show any strong relationship between hydrogen recovery and temperature. Hydrogen recovery showed to increase slightly with increase in residual hydrocarbon density. However, the effect of residual hydrocarbon was observed to be significant on purity of the produced hydrogen. In this sense, depleted black oil reservoirs seem to be the best and dry gas reservoirs the worst choice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2039 (1) ◽  
pp. 012005
Author(s):  
D V Blinov ◽  
V I Borzenko ◽  
A V Bezdudny ◽  
A N Kazakov

Abstract The results of the development of metal hydride (MH) reactors for the storage and purification of hydrogen of various types are presented. Two methods of metal hydride purification of hydrogen are presented. The use of the MH method of flow-through purification of hydrogen has high hydrogen recovery rates at high volume contents of hydrogen in the mixture (⩾10% vol.), while the method of periodic evacuation of accumulated impurities is most effective at low hydrogen contents in the mixture (<10% vol.).


Author(s):  
Limei Gai ◽  
Petar Sabev Varbanov ◽  
Yee Van Fan ◽  
Jiří Jaromír Klemeš ◽  
Sandro Nižetić
Keyword(s):  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2450
Author(s):  
Jinsheng Xiao ◽  
Ang Mei ◽  
Wei Tao ◽  
Shuo Ma ◽  
Pierre Bénard ◽  
...  

Hydrogen purification is an important part of hydrogen energy utilization. This study aimed to perform hydrogen purification of multi-component gas (H2/CO2/CH4/CO/N2 = 0.79/0.17/0.021/0.012/0.007) by one-column vacuum pressure swing adsorption (VPSA) and pressure swing adsorption (PSA). AC5-KS was selected as the adsorbent for hydrogen purification due to its greater adsorption capacity compared to R2030. Furthermore, VPSA and PSA 10-step cycle models were established to simulate the hydrogen purification process using the Aspen Adsorption platform. The simulation results showed that the hydrogen purification performance of VPSA is better than that of PSA on AC5-KS adsorbent. The effects of feeding time and purging time on hydrogen purity and recovery were also discussed. Results showed that feeding time has a negative effect on hydrogen purity and a positive effect on hydrogen recovery, while purging time has a positive effect on hydrogen purity and a negative effect on hydrogen recovery. By using an artificial neural network (ANN), the relationship between the inputs (feeding time and purging time) and outputs (hydrogen purity and recovery) was established. Based on the ANN, the interior point method was applied to optimize hydrogen purification performance. Considering two optimization cases, the optimized feeding time and purging time were obtained. The optimization results showed that the maximum hydrogen recovery reached 88.65% when the feeding time was 223 s and the purging time was 96 s. The maximum hydrogen purity reached 99.33% when the feeding time was 100 s and the purging time was 45 s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document