Residue return can prevent or restore the degradation of cropland,
meanwhile, additional N input from residue return inevitably result in
the changes of soil nitrogen (N) pools. Our objectives were to evaluate
these changes in a 16-year field experiment. The residue return
experiment consisted of no-tillage (NT) and mouldboard plough (MP),
combined with continuous maize (Zea mays L.) (MM) and maize-soybean
(Glycine max Merr.) rotation (MS) cropping systems, that is, NTMM, NTMS,
MPMM, MPMS; conventional tillage (removal of crop residue and deep
plough) with continuous maize (CTMM) was included as a control. The soil
was separated into density (LF, light fraction) and particle size (sand,
silt and clay) fraction. In 0-5 cm and 5-10 cm layers, soil TN content
in NT was higher than MP, whereas the opposite trend was observed in
10-20 cm. Thus, the stratification ratio of soil TN was greater under
NT. Cropping system affected soil TN as MM > MS. Residue
return increased soil N storage by 6.44%-24.85% in the plough layer.
Taking CTMM as the baseline, NTMM and MPMM increased the N storage in
all physical fractions, while the decrease of silt-N storage was
observed in NTMS and MPMS. Under residue return, the distribution of N
storage changes in LF and sand fraction was affected by tillage
practice, and that in silt and clay fraction was affected by cropping
system. In summary, NTMM is effective for soil N accumulation due to its
highest N storage and all physical fractions of N storage was enhanced.