Functional Studies of Novel FOXL2 Variants in Chinese Families With Blepharophimosis–Ptosis–Epicanthus Inversus Syndrome

The blepharophimosis–ptosis–epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES) is a rare autosomal dominant disease mainly caused by FOXL2 variants. This genetic disorder is usually characterized by eyelid malformation and ovarian dysfunction. However, no reliable genotype/phenotype correlations have been established considering the ovarian phenotype. Here, we detected 15 FOXL2 variants including nine novel ones from 7 families and 8 sporadic cases, which expanded the spectrum of FOXL2 variants and identified a potential clinical cause. Functional studies, with respect to the effect of FOXL2 on the StAR promoter, showed that non-sense variants that lead to protein truncation before the polyalanine tract and missense variants [c.307C > T; p.(Arg103Cys), c.311A > C; p.(His104Pro), c.320G > A; p.(Ser107Asn), and c.335T > A; p.(Phe112Tyr)] within the central portion of the FOXL2 forkhead domain significantly affect its suppressor activity. Such changes may explain the mechanism underlying a more severe phenotype, more likely to result in BPES type I. Furthermore, the missenses variants c.307C > T; p.(Arg103Cys), c.311A > C; p.(His104Pro), and c.320G > A; p.(Ser107Asn) were not able to transactivate OSR2, which is consistent with the eyelid malformation in these patients. The results from our cohort have expanded the spectrum of FOXL2 variants and have provided insights into genotype/phenotype correlations.

Biophysical investigation of the dual binding surfaces of human transcription factors FOXO4 and p53

Cellular senescence is protective against external oncogenic stress, but its accumulation causes aging-related diseases. Forkhead box O4 (FOXO4) and p53 are human transcription factors known to promote senescence by interacting in the promyelocytic leukemia bodies. Inhibiting their binding is a strategy for inducing apoptosis of senescent cells, but the binding surfaces that mediate the interaction of FOXO4 and p53 remain elusive. Here, we investigated two binding sites involved in the interaction between FOXO4 and p53 by using NMR spectroscopy. NMR chemical shift perturbation analysis showed that the binding between FOXO4’s forkhead domain (FHD) and p53’s transactivation domain (TAD), and between FOXO4’s C-terminal transactivation domain (CR3) and p53’s DNA binding domain (DBD), mediate the FOXO4-p53 interaction. Also, we showed that the CR3-binding surface of FOXO4 FHD interacts with p53 TAD2, and four residues of FOXO4 CR3 interact with the DNA-binding surface of p53 DBD. Further isothermal titration calorimetry experiments showed that the FOXO4 FHD-p53 TAD interaction takes precedence with high affinity and that the FOXO4 CR3-p53 DBD interaction follows. This work provides structural information at the molecular level that is key to understanding the interplay of two proteins responsible for cellular senescence.

The influence of various regions of the FOXP2 sequence on its structure and DNA binding function

FOX proteins are a superfamily of transcription factors which share a DNA binding domain referred to as the forkhead domain. Our focus is on the FOXP subfamily members, which are involved in language and cognition amongst other things. The FOXP proteins contain a conserved zinc finger and a leucine zipper motif in addition to the forkhead domain. The remainder of the sequence is predicted to be unstructured and includes an acidic C-terminal tail. In this study we aim to investigate how both the structured and unstructured regions of the sequence cooperate so as to enable FOXP proteins to perform their function. We do this by studying the effect of these regions on both oligomerisation and DNA binding. Structurally, the FOXP proteins appear to be comparatively globular with a high proportion of helical structure. The proteins multimerise via the leucine zipper and the stability of the multimers is controlled by the unstructured interlinking sequence including the acid rich tail. FOXP2 is more compact than FOXP1, has a greater propensity to form higher order oligomers, and binds DNA with stronger affinity. We conclude that while the forkhead domain is necessary for DNA binding, the affinity of the binding event is attributable to the leucine zipper, and the unstructured regions play a significant role in the specificity of binding. The acid rich tail forms specific contacts with the forkhead domain which may influence oligomerisation and DNA binding and therefore the acid rich tail may play an important regulatory role in FOXP transcription.

A Novel Forkhead Box Protein P (FoxP) From Litopenaeus vannamei Plays a Positive Role in Immune Response

The forkhead box protein P (FoxP) family members have been known to be important for regulation of immune responses in vertebrates, but their roles in invertebrate immunity remain unclear. In this study, a novel FoxP gene (LvFoxP) was identified from Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and functionally studied in the context of immune response. Possessing a conserved FoxP coiled-coil domain and a forkhead domain, LvFoxP shared homology to vertebrate FoxP family members, in particular FoxP1. Expression of LvFoxP was detectable in all the examined tissues and could be up-regulated by immune challenge in gill and hemocytes. The LvFoxP protein was present in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of hemocytes and could be nuclear-translocated upon immune stimulation. Silencing of LvFoxP increased the susceptibility of shrimp to infections by Vibrio parahaemolyticus and white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and down-regulated the expression of multiple components of NF-κB and JAK-STAT pathways and almost all the examined immune effector genes. Moreover, the phagocytic activity of hemocytes from LvFoxP-silenced shrimp against V. parahaemolyticus was decreased. These suggested that LvFoxP could play a positive role in immune response. The current study may provide novel insights into the immunity of invertebrates and the functional evolution of the FoxP family.

FOXP2 and language alterations in psychiatric pathology

Background. From the first reports of the linguist Noam Chomsky it has become clear that the development of language has an important genetic component. Several reports in families have shown the relationship between language disorders and genetic polymorphisms. The FOXP2 gene has been a fundamental piece for the understanding of language development. This gene codes for a transcription factor containing a forkhead domain of DNA binding and participates in the regulation of the expression of a large number of genes involved in the embryonic development of fundamental neuronal structures needed for the development of speech and language. Objective. To present an updated view of the relationship between FOXP2 and language alterations in psychiatric pathology. Method. Narrative review of information reported in databases on the recent advances supporting genetic participation in language disorders of psychiatric illness. Results. Update of content related to FOXP2 and its participation in language alterations in psychiatric diseases. Discussion and conclusion. Advances in the genetic study of language disorders in psychiatric pathology open up new avenues of investigation that allow us to explore how language emerged and how it evolved, as well as to carry out comparative studies on the structure and functioning of genes to approach the understanding of this complex characteristic that makes us human.

The protonation state of an evolutionarily conserved histidine modulates domain swapping stability of FoxP1

Forkhead box P (FoxP) proteins are members of the versatile Fox transcription factors, which control the timing and expression of multiple genes for eukaryotic cell homeostasis. Compared to other Fox proteins, they can form domain-swapped dimers through their DNA-binding –forkhead– domains, enabling spatial reorganization of distant chromosome elements by tethering two DNA molecules together. Yet, domain swapping stability and DNA binding affinity varies between different FoxP proteins. Experimental evidence suggests that the protonation state of a histidine residue conserved in all Fox proteins is responsible for pH-dependent modulation of these interactions. Here, we explore the consequences of the protonation state of another histidine (H59), only conserved within FoxM/O/P subfamilies, on folding and dimerization of the forkhead domain of human FoxP1. Dimer dissociation kinetics and equilibrium unfolding experiments demonstrate that protonation of H59 leads to destabilization of the domain-swapped dimer due to an increase in free energy difference between the monomeric and transition states. This pH–dependence is abolished when H59 is mutated to alanine. Furthermore, anisotropy measurements and molecular dynamics evidence that H59 has a direct impact in the local stability of helixH3. Altogether, our results highlight the relevance of H59 in domain swapping and folding stability of FoxP1.