Circulating tumor cell heterogeneity in neuroendocrine prostate cancer by single cell copy number analysis

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer is an aggressive variant of prostate cancer that may arise de novo or develop from pre-existing prostate adenocarcinoma as a mechanism of treatment resistance. The combined loss of tumor suppressors RB1, TP53, and PTEN are frequent in NEPC but also present in a subset of prostate adenocarcinomas. Most clinical and preclinical studies support a trans-differentiation process, whereby NEPC arises clonally from a prostate adenocarcinoma precursor during the course of treatment resistance. Here we highlight a case of NEPC with significant intra-patient heterogeneity observed across metastases. We further demonstrate how single-cell genomic analysis of circulating tumor cells combined with a phenotypic evaluation of cellular diversity can be considered as a window into tumor heterogeneity in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Biomimetic Nanotechnology: A Natural Path Forward for Tumor-Selective and Tumor-Specific NIR Activable Photonanomedicines

The emergence of biomimetic nanotechnology has seen an exponential rise over the past decade with applications in regenerative medicine, immunotherapy and drug delivery. In the context of nanomedicines activated by near infrared (NIR) photodynamic processes (photonanomedicines; PNMs), biomimetic nanotechnology is pushing the boundaries of activatable tumor targeted nanoscale drug delivery systems. This review discusses how, by harnessing a unique collective of biological processes critical to targeting of solid tumors, biomimetic PNMs (bPNMs) can impart tumor cell specific and tumor selective photodynamic therapy-based combination regimens. Through molecular immune evasion and self-recognition, bPNMs can confer both tumor selectivity (preferential bulk tumor accumulation) and tumor specificity (discrete molecular affinity for cancer cells), respectively. They do so in a manner that is akin, yet arguably superior, to synthetic molecular-targeted PNMs. A particular emphasis is made on how bPNMs can be engineered to circumvent tumor cell heterogeneity, which is considered the Achilles’ heel of molecular targeted therapeutics. Forward-looking propositions are also presented on how patient tumor heterogeneity can ultimately be recapitulated to fabricate patient-specific, heterogeneity-targeting bPNMs.

Role of glioblastoma stem cells in cancer therapeutic resistance: a perspective on antineoplastic agents from natural sources and chemical derivatives

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the highest-grade form of glioma, as well as one of the most aggressive types of cancer, exhibiting rapid cellular growth and highly invasive behavior. Despite significant advances in diagnosis and therapy in recent decades, the outcomes for high-grade gliomas (WHO grades III-IV) remain unfavorable, with a median overall survival time of 15–18 months. The concept of cancer stem cells (CSCs) has emerged and provided new insight into GBM resistance and management. CSCs can self-renew and initiate tumor growth and are also responsible for tumor cell heterogeneity and the induction of systemic immunosuppression. The idea that GBM resistance could be dependent on innate differences in the sensitivity of clonogenic glial stem cells (GSCs) to chemotherapeutic drugs/radiation prompted the scientific community to rethink the understanding of GBM growth and therapies directed at eliminating these cells or modulating their stemness. This review aims to describe major intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that mediate chemoradioresistant GSCs and therapies based on antineoplastic agents from natural sources, derivatives, and synthetics used alone or in synergistic combination with conventional treatment. We will also address ongoing clinical trials focused on these promising targets. Although the development of effective therapy for GBM remains a major challenge in molecular oncology, GSC knowledge can offer new directions for a promising future.

Resistance to Antiandrogens in Prostate Cancer: Is It Inevitable, Intrinsic or Induced?

Increasingly sophisticated therapies for chemical castration dominate first-line treatments for locally advanced prostate cancer. However, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) offers little prospect of a cure, as resistant tumors emerge rather rapidly, normally within 30 months. Cells have multiple mechanisms of resistance to even the most sophisticated drug regimes, and both tumor cell heterogeneity in prostate cancer and the multiple salvage pathways result in castration-resistant disease related genetically to the original hormone-naive cancer. The timing and mechanisms of cell death after ADT for prostate cancer are not well understood, and off-target effects after long-term ADT due to functional extra-prostatic expression of the androgen receptor protein are now increasingly being recorded. Our knowledge of how these widely used treatments fail at a biological level in patients is deficient. In this review, I will discuss whether there are pre-existing drug-resistant cells in a tumor mass, or whether resistance is induced/selected by the ADT. Equally, what is the cell of origin of this resistance, and does it differ from the treatment-naïve tumor cells by differentiation or dedifferentiation? Conflicting evidence also emerges from studies in the range of biological systems and species employed to answer this key question. It is only by improving our understanding of this aspect of treatment and not simply devising another new means of androgen inhibition that we can improve patient outcomes.