smc proteins
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

63
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (24) ◽  
pp. 13432
Author(s):  
Hugo Maruyama ◽  
Takayuki Nambu ◽  
Chiho Mashimo ◽  
Toshinori Okinaga ◽  
Kunio Takeyasu

Comparative structural/molecular biology by single-molecule analyses combined with single-cell dissection, mass spectroscopy, and biochemical reconstitution have been powerful tools for elucidating the mechanisms underlying genome DNA folding. All genomes in the three domains of life undergo stepwise folding from DNA to 30–40 nm fibers. Major protein players are histone (Eukarya and Archaea), Alba (Archaea), and HU (Bacteria) for fundamental structural units of the genome. In Euryarchaeota, a major archaeal phylum, either histone or HTa (the bacterial HU homolog) were found to wrap DNA. This finding divides archaea into two groups: those that use DNA-wrapping as the fundamental step in genome folding and those that do not. Archaeal transcription factor-like protein TrmBL2 has been suggested to be involved in genome folding and repression of horizontally acquired genes, similar to bacterial H-NS protein. Evolutionarily divergent SMC proteins contribute to the establishment of higher-order structures. Recent results are presented, including the use of Hi-C technology to reveal that archaeal SMC proteins are involved in higher-order genome folding, and the use of single-molecule tracking to reveal the detailed functions of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC proteins. Here, we highlight the similarities and differences in the DNA-folding mechanisms in the three domains of life.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh P. Prince ◽  
Jani R. Bolla ◽  
Gemma L. M. Fisher ◽  
Jarno Mäkelä ◽  
Marjorie Fournier ◽  
...  

AbstractStructural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes act ubiquitously to compact DNA linearly, thereby facilitating chromosome organization-segregation. SMC proteins have a conserved architecture, with a dimerization hinge and an ATPase head domain separated by a long antiparallel intramolecular coiled-coil. Dimeric SMC proteins interact with essential accessory proteins, kleisins that bridge the two subunits of an SMC dimer, and HAWK/KITE proteins that interact with kleisins. The ATPase activity of the Escherichia coli SMC protein, MukB, which is essential for its in vivo function, requires its interaction with the dimeric kleisin, MukF that in turn interacts with the KITE protein, MukE. Here we demonstrate that, in addition, MukB interacts specifically with Acyl Carrier Protein (AcpP) that has essential functions in fatty acid synthesis. We characterize the AcpP interaction at the joint of the MukB coiled-coil and show that the interaction is necessary for MukB ATPase and for MukBEF function in vivo.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Bonato ◽  
Davide Michieletto

Loop extrusion convincingly describes how certain Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC) proteins mediate the formation of large DNA loops. Yet, most of the existing computational models cannot reconcile the recent observations that, while per-forming cis-extrusion, condensins can traverse each other and bypass large roadblocks in vitro. In this work, we propose an inter-strand model for loop extrusion which not only reproduces the experimental features of loop extrusion by one SMC complex, but also predicts the formation of so-called “Z-loops” via the interaction of two or more SMCs extruding along the same DNA substrate. By performing Molecular Dynamics simulations of this model we discover that the experimentally observed asymmetry in the different types of Z-loops is a natural consequence of the DNA tethering in vitro. Intriguingly, our model predicts this bias to disappear in absence of tethering and a third type of Z-loop, which has not yet been identified in experiments, to appear. We conclude discussing the implications of inter-strand loop extrusion on entangled DNA.


eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi J Petela ◽  
Andres Gonzalez Llamazares ◽  
Sarah Dixon ◽  
Bin Hu ◽  
Byung-Gil Lee ◽  
...  

Cohesin’s association with and translocation along chromosomal DNAs depend on an ATP hydrolysis cycle driving the association and subsequent release of DNA. This involves DNA being ‘clamped’ by Scc2 and ATP-dependent engagement of cohesin’s Smc1 and Smc3 head domains. Scc2’s replacement by Pds5 abrogates cohesin’s ATPase and has an important role in halting DNA loop extrusion. The ATPase domains of all SMC proteins are separated from their hinge dimerisation domains by 50-nm-long coiled coils, which have been observed to zip up along their entire length and fold around an elbow, thereby greatly shortening the distance between hinges and ATPase heads. Whether folding exists in vivo or has any physiological importance is not known. We present here a cryo-EM structure of the apo form of cohesin that reveals the structure of folded and zipped-up coils in unprecedented detail and shows that Scc2 can associate with Smc1’s ATPase head even when it is fully disengaged from that of Smc3. Using cysteine-specific crosslinking, we show that cohesin’s coiled coils are frequently folded in vivo, including when cohesin holds sister chromatids together. Moreover, we describe a mutation (SMC1D588Y) within Smc1’s hinge that alters how Scc2 and Pds5 interact with Smc1’s hinge and that enables Scc2 to support loading in the absence of its normal partner Scc4. The mutant phenotype of loading without Scc4 is only explicable if loading depends on an association between Scc2/4 and cohesin’s hinge, which in turn requires coiled coil folding.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Prince ◽  
Jani Bolla ◽  
Gemma Fisher ◽  
Jarno Makela ◽  
Majorie Fournier ◽  
...  

Abstract Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes contribute ubiquitously to chromosome organization-segregation. SMC proteins have a conserved architecture, with a dimerization hinge and an ATPase head domain separated by a long antiparallel intramolecular coiled-coil. Dimeric SMC proteins interact with essential accessory proteins, kleisins that bridge the two subunits of an SMC dimer, and HAWK/KITE accessory proteins that interact with kleisins. The ATPase activity of the Escherichia coli SMC protein, MukB, is essential for in vivo function and is regulated by interactions with its dimeric kleisin, MukF, and KITE, MukE. Here we demonstrate that, in addition, MukB interacts with Acyl Carrier Protein (AcpP) that has essential functions in fatty acid synthesis. We characterize the AcpP interaction site at the joint of the MukB coiled-coil and show that the interaction is essential for MukB ATPase and for MukBEF function in vivo. Therefore, AcpP is an essential co-factor for MukBEF action in chromosome organization-segregation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari Yoshinaga ◽  
Yuji Inagaki

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes are common in Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryota. SMC proteins, together with the proteins related to SMC (SMC-related proteins), constitute a superfamily of ATPases. Bacteria/Archaea and Eukaryotes are distinctive from one another in terms of the repertory of SMC proteins. A single type of SMC protein is dimerized in the bacterial and archaeal complexes, whereas eukaryotes possess six distinct SMC subfamilies (SMC1-6), constituting three heterodimeric complexes, namely cohesin, condensin, and SMC5/6 complex. Thus, to bridge the homodimeric SMC complexes in Bacteria and Archaea to the heterodimeric SMC complexes in Eukaryota, we need to invoke multiple duplications of a SMC gene followed by functional divergence. However, to our knowledge, the evolution of the SMC proteins in Eukaryota had not been examined for more than a decade. In this study, we reexamined the ubiquity of SMC1-6 in phylogenetically diverse eukaryotes that cover the major eukaryotic taxonomic groups recognized to date (101 species in total) and provide two novel insights into the SMC evolution in eukaryotes. First, multiple secondary losses of SMC5 and SMC6 occurred in the eukaryotic evolution. Second, the SMC proteins constituting cohesin and condensin (i.e., SMC1-4), and SMC5 and SMC6 were derived from closely related but distinct ancestral proteins. Finally, we discuss how SMC1-4 were evolved from the ancestral SMC protein(s) in the very early stage of eukaryotic evolution.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Souza Câmara ◽  
Veit Schubert ◽  
Martin Mascher ◽  
Andreas Houben

ABSTRACTCentromeres are essential for chromosome movement. In independent taxa, species with holocentric chromosomes exist. In contrast to monocentric species, where no obvious dispersion of centromeres occurs during interphase, the organization of holocentromeres differs between condensed and decondensed chromosomes. During interphase, centromeres are dispersed into a large number of CENH3-positive nucleosome clusters in a number of holocentric species. With the onset of chromosome condensation, the centromeric nucleosomes join and form line-like holocentromeres. Using polymer simulations, we propose a mechanism, relying on the interaction between centromeric nucleosomes and Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) proteins. All simulations represented a ~20 Mbp-long chromosome, corresponding to ~100,000 nucleosomes. Different sets of molecular dynamic simulations were evaluated by testing four parameters: 1) the concentration of Loop Extruders (LEs) corresponding to SMCs; 2) the distribution and number of centromeric nucleosomes; 3) the effect of centromeric nucleosomes on interacting LEs; and 4) the assembly of kinetochores bound to centromeric nucleosomes. We observed the formation of a line-like holocentromere, due to the aggregation of the centromeric nucleosomes when the chromosome was compacted into loops. A groove-like holocentromere structure formed after a kinetochore complex was simulated along the centromeric line. Similar mechanisms may also organize a monocentric chromosome constriction, and its regulation may cause different centromere types during evolution.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh P Prince ◽  
Jani R Bolla ◽  
Gemma L.M. Fisher ◽  
Jarno Makela ◽  
Carol V. Robinson ◽  
...  

Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes contribute ubiquitously to chromosome organization-segregation. SMC proteins have a conserved architecture, with a dimerization hinge and an ATPase head domain separated by a long antiparallel intramolecular coiled-coil. Dimeric SMC proteins interact with essential accessory proteins, kleisins that bridge the two subunits of an SMC dimer, and HAWK/KITE accessory proteins that interact with kleisins. The ATPase activity of the Escherichia coli SMC protein, MukB, is essential for in vivo function and is regulated by interactions with its dimeric kleisin, MukF, and KITE, MukE. Here we demonstrate that, in addition, MukB interacts with Acyl Carrier Protein (AcpP) that has essential functions in fatty acid synthesis. We characterize the AcpP interaction site at the joint of the MukB coiled-coil and show that the interaction is essential for MukB ATPase and for MukBEF function in vivo. Therefore, AcpP is an essential co-factor for MukBEF action in chromosome organization-segregation.


Microbiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suchitra Pradhan ◽  
Shwetha K. ◽  
Pratibha Kumari ◽  
Ravi Kumar

Multi-subunit SMC complexes are required to perform essential functions, such as chromosome compaction, segregation and DNA repair, from bacteria to humans. Prokaryotic SMC proteins form complexes with two non-SMC subunits, ScpA and ScpB, to condense the chromosome. The mutants of both scpa and scpb genes in Bacillus subtilis have been shown to display characteristic phenotypes such as growth defects and increased frequency of anucleate cells. Here, we studied the function of the Smc-ScpAB complex from Mycobacterium smegmatis . We observed no significant growth difference between the scpb null mutant and wild-type M. smegmatis under both standard and stress conditions. Furthermore, we characterized the Smc-ScpAB holocomplex from M. smegmatis . The MsSMC consists of the dimerization hinge and ATPase head domains connected by long coiled-coils. The MsSMC interacts with two non-SMC proteins, ScpA and ScpB, and the resulting holocomplex binds to different DNA substrates independent of ATP. The Smc-ScpAB complex showed DNA-stimulated ATPase activity in the presence of ssDNA. A cytological profiling assay revealed that upon overexpression the Smc-ScpAB ternary complex compacts the decondensed nucleoid of rifampicin-treated wild-type and null mukb mutant of Escherichia coli in vivo. Together, our study suggests that M. smegmatis has a functional Smc-ScpAB complex capable of DNA binding and condensation. Based on our observations, we speculate that the presence of alternative SMCs such as MksB or other SMC homologues might have rescued the scpb mutant phenotype in M. smegmatis .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document