Management of radio-contrast allergy in radio-contrast allergic patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention

Objectives Radiocontrast agents (RCA) allergy occurs in 0.04 % – 0.22 % of patients. However, the risk of allergic reaction increases as 16 % to 35 % in patients with prior RCA allergy. Herein we reported our experience in patients with a prior history of RCA induced anaphylaxis who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and intervention.Methods This retrospective study included 11 patients with prior history of RCA anaphylaxis who underwent CAG and / or intervention at our clinic between May 2016 and September 2019. The mean age of the patients was 61.8±8.99 years, 8 (72.7 %) were female, 9 (81.8 %) had hypertension, 6 (54.5 %) – diabetes mellitus, 11 (100 %) – dyslipidemia, 8 (72.7 %) patients were current smokers, 4 had prior history RCA allergy after i.v. RCA administration in contrast enhanced computed tomography and 7 patients experienced RCA allergy after CAG. All patients had prior severe anaphylaxis reaction. All patients were pretreated with intravenous feniramin maleat 45.5 mg and methylprednizolone 80 mg one hour before the procedure and dexametazon 8 mg after the procedure.Results CAG and intervention was successfully completed in all patients. Two patients had breakthrough RCA induced anaphylaxis, theyhad urticarial, itching, dyspnea and chest tightness, angioedema during coronary artery stenting. Additional dose of i.v. methylpredinisolene 80 mg, salbutamol nebulae and i.v. adrenalin 1 mg administration rapidly stabilize the patients. All patients were successfully treated and uneventfully discharged after percutaneous coronary intervention.Conclusion Management of patients with prior RCA adverse drug reaction may be complex. However when CAG and / or intervention is required in such patients it may be safely performed with premedication.

Acute Kidney Damage: Definition, Classification and Optimal Time of Hemodialysis

Acute damage to the kidney is a serious complication in patients in intensive care units. The causes of acute kidney damage in these patients may be prerenal, renal and postrenal. Sepsis is the most common cause of the development of acute kidney damage in intensive care units. For the definition and classification of acute kidney damage in clinical practice, the RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO classifications are used. There is a complex link between acute kidney damage and other organs. Acute kidney damage is induced by complex pathophysiological mechanisms that cause acute damage and functional disorders of the heart (acute heart failure, acute coronary syndrome and cardiac arrhythmias), brain (whole body cramps, ischaemic stroke and coma), lung (acute damage to the lung and acute respiratory distress syndrome) and liver (hypoxic hepatitis and acute hepatic insufficiency). New biomarkers, colour Doppler ultrasound diagnosis and kidney biopsy have significant roles in the diagnosis of acute kidney damage. Prevention of the development of acute kidney damage in intensive care units includes maintaining an adequate haemodynamic status in patients and avoiding nephrotoxic drugs and agents (radiocontrast agents). The complications of acute kidney damage (hyperkalaemia, metabolic acidosis, hypervolaemia and azotaemia) are treated with medications, intravenous solutions, and therapies for renal function replacement. Absolute indications for acute haemodialysis include resistant hyperkalaemia, severe metabolic acidosis, resistant hypervolaemia and complications of high azotaemia. In the absence of an absolute indication, dialysis is indicated for patients in intensive care units at stage 3 of the AKIN/KDIGO classification and in some patients with stage 2. Intermittent haemodialysis is applied for haemodynamically stable patients with severe hyperkalaemia and hypervolaemia. In patients who are haemodynamically unstable and have liver insufficiency or brain damage, continuous modalities of treatment for renal replacement are indicated.

Studying the influence of high-speed disintegrator activation on the properties of radiocontrast agents

Under the initiative and direct scientific supervision of academician I.V. Gorynin, researchers of CRISM “Prometey” began to study effects of high-energy shock disintegrator technology for processing materials of various classes and different purposes. In particular, much attention was paid to the activation of biomaterials in supersonic action in the working zone of disintegrators. This article studies effects of high-energy activation on biological activity of pharmaceutical and medical products.

Adverse Reactions to Contrast Material: A Canadian Update

Imaging techniques frequently employ contrast agents to improve image resolution and enhance pathology detection. These gadolinium- and iodine-based media, although generally considered safe, are associated with a number of adverse effects ranging from mild to severe. Reactions are classified as either anaphylactoid (“anaphylaxis-like”) or nonanaphylactoid, depending on a number of elements that will be reviewed. Herein, we have summarized predisposing risk factors for adverse events resulting from the use of contrast, their associated pathophysiological mechanisms as well as known prophylaxis for the antitreatment of high-risk patients. In the unlikely event that a serious adverse reaction does occur, we have provided a comprehensive summary of treatment protocols. Our goal was to thoroughly evaluate the current literature regarding adverse reactions to radiocontrast agents and provide an up to date review for the health care provider.