Successful Surgical Salvage for a Patient with Ruptured Coronary Sinus during Percutaneous Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Case Report

Herein, we describe the rare anatomy of an abnormal shunt from the left atrium to the coronary sinus, which ruptured during a percutaneous ablation for atrial fibrillation. The iatrogenic lesion was successfully repaired after emergent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation set up followed by surgical exploration. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful, and she was regularly followed up without any complications.

RADI-23. Exploring the optimal timing of routine initial surveillance MRI following treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery: a comparison of two approaches

Purpose To measure the value of early initial surveillance MRI scans in patients with brain metastases undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), as MRI scans are a significant cost and patient stressor. Methods We identified a retrospective cohort of patients with brain metastases treated with SRS and followed at a single institution with scheduled 6-week or 12-week initial surveillance MRI. Imaging interval was based on policy of different providers. Outcome measures included new/progressive lesions, salvage treatment, detection of new lesions before symptoms, and use of surgical resection. Results Two hundred patients were included: 100 consecutive patients scanned with 6-week and 12-week imaging. Eighty-seven and 74 patients in each group had available follow-up imaging and were analyzed. Median time to MRI was 6.7 weeks and 13.5 (p<.001). No difference in primary site, prior SRS, number of treated brain metastases, or use of targeted therapy/immune checkpoint inhibitors was detected. A lower percentage of patients with 6-week MRI had controlled extracranial disease at initial treatment (30% vs 47%,p=.003). Twenty-eight percent with 6-week MRI had findings concerning for new/progressive disease, compared to 47% with 3-month MRI (p=0.01). Fifteen percent (10/87) with 6-week MRI underwent intervention (i.e. SRS, whole brain radiotherapy, or surgery) compared to 34% (20/74) with 12-week MRI (p=0.004). Of patients receiving SRS, a higher percentage had new/worsening neurologic symptoms (45% vs 30%) at follow-up although a lower percentage had new lesions >1cm (20% vs 50%) when discovered. One patient in each group underwent surgical salvage. Conclusion While shorter 6-week interval MRI surveillance post-SRS may detect new/progressive disease less frequently than 12-week MRI surveillance intervals, short interval MRI may be more likely to detect new/progressive lesions before symptoms develop. Surgical salvage was uncommon with either schedule. Further study may identify a high-risk subgroup who would benefit from early surveillance.

Prognostic Factors Associated with Successful Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Oral Cancer

Most patients with recurrent oral cancer are not eligible for salvage surgery. Among those who are candidates for surgical salvage, failure rates are high. Given the potential negative impact of salvage surgery on quality of life (QoL)—particularly in unsuccessful interventions—the decision to operate must be weighed carefully. However, the variables associated with successful surgical salvage in oral cancer have not been clearly established. In the present retrospective study, we sought to determine the factors associated with disease recurrence and successful salvage surgery. We evaluated the following parameters in patients (n = 261) treated for primary oral cancer at our institution from 2010 to 2017: age; T/N status; perineurial invasion; lymphovascular invasion; extranodal extension; and margin status. In total, 36 patients (33%) were considered eligible for salvage surgery. Four variables were significantly associated with suitability for salvage surgery: early primary T stage, no primary neck disease (N0), no positive margins in the primary resection, and no adjuvant radiotherapy following primary resection. The only variable significantly associated with improved salvage outcomes was negative margin status after the primary tumor resection, underscoring the importance of margin status on treatment outcomes. Additional studies are needed to identify other factors associated with successful salvage surgery in order to better stratify patients according to the likelihood of success, thus potentially avoiding the negative impact on QoL in patients who undergo unsuccessful surgery.

Does non-TME surgery of rectal cancer compromise the chance of cure? Preliminary surgical salvage data from OPERA phase III randomized trial.

12 Background: Non-operative modality (NOM) treatment of rectal cancer is gaining popularity as it avoids extirpative TME surgery and a stoma. OPERA trial was set up to evaluate the role of dose escalation using Contact X-ray brachytherapy [CXB] in improving the chance of organ preservation compared to the standard of care (EBCRT and TME surgery). We report on the preliminary surgical salvage data for treatment failures in the OPERA trial (NCT02505750). Methods: OPERA is a European phase 3 randomised trial between (Arm A- standard arm) EBCRT 45Gy/25/5weeks with oral capecitabine 825mg/m2 and EBRT boost of 9Gy/5/5 days randomised against (Arm B- experimental arm) EBCRT followed by CXB boost (90 Gy/3/4 weeks). Patients were assessed at 14, 20 and 24 weeks. Watch & wait policy was adopted for patients with cCR at 24 weeks after randomisation and surgery (TME or local excision) was offered for residual disease and also for local regrowth (recurrence) at a later date. Results: From July 2015 –June 2020, 148 patients were randomised of which 144 were evaluable (table). There were 71 patients in Arm A (standard) and 73 patients in Arm B (experimental). Median follow-up was 19 months (range 2-36 m). Overall clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in 103 out of 127 evaluable patients (81%) at 24 week in both arms (blinded). Surgery was carried out in 36/ 127 (28%) patients with suspected residual tumour. Further 13 patients had salvage surgery at a later date for local regrowth. At 19 months, 49/144 (34%) patients in total cohort had surgery. Local excision was carried out in 24 /49(49%) of which 3 proceeded to TME surgery due to R (1) or ypT2 adverse histology. TME surgery was carried out in 28/49 of which 8/28 (28.6%) had APER and 20/28(71.4%) had AR. In total, organ preservation (blinded) was achieved in 116/144 (80.5%) for the whole cohort. Kaplan Meier estimate of TME free survival is 76% at 19 months. Conclusions: Non-TME surgical treatment for cT2-cT3a-b rectal cancer is feasible in those who are fit and wish to avoid surgery (Watch & Wait). Those who needed surgery can be offered salvage surgery immediately for local residual disease or for local regrowth at a later date. Organ preservation of 80.5% (blinded) can be achieved without compromising their chance of cure. Clinical trial information: NCT02505750. [Table: see text]

Salvage Resection for Isolated Local and/or Regional Failure of Head/Neck Cancer Following Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Primary management of advanced head/neck cancers involves concurrent chemoradiotherapy . Subsequently, regional and local failures are managed with resection but there have been few reports that describe the morbidity and disease control outcomes of surgical salvage in this setting. Methods: Retrospective analysis describes complications, survival, and patterns of failure after salvage resection of isolated local and/or regional failures of head/neck cancer following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Results: Sixteen patients were identified for inclusion: laryngectomy in 11 patients, oral cavity/oropharynx resection in 2 patients, and neck dissection alone in 4 patients. Ten patients required graft tissue reconstruction (6 pedicle and 4 free flap). Median post-operative hospitalization was 7 days (range 3-19), and 4 patients required hospital re-admission. At a median survivor follow-up of 15.8 months (range 4.3-34.9), 10 patients were alive (6 without evidence of disease). Seven patients experienced disease recurrence at a median 6.7 months (range 0-12.6) following salvage resection (2 with isolated distant failures). Estimated 2-year local/regional control, freedom from failure, and overall survival were 58%, 39%, and 58%, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical salvage after primary definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is feasible with toxicity and outcomes similar to prior radiotherapy alone or sequential chemotherapy and radiation. Local andregional recurrence remains the predominant pattern of failure.

Cost-Effectiveness and Quality-Adjusted Survival of Watch and Wait After Complete Response to Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. There is interest in deescalating local therapy after a clinical complete response to CRT. We hypothesized that a watch-and-wait (WW) strategy offers comparable cancer-specific survival, superior quality-adjusted survival, and reduced cost compared with upfront TME. Methods We developed a decision-analytic model to compare WW, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection for patients achieving a clinical complete response to CRT. Rates of local regrowth, pelvic recurrence, and distant metastasis were derived from series comparing WW with TME after pathologic complete response. Lifetime incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were calculated between strategies, and sensitivity analyses were performed to study model uncertainty. Results The base case 5-year cancer-specific survival was 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91.5% to 94.9%) on a WW program compared with 95.9% (95% CI = 93.6% to 97.4%) after upfront TME. WW was dominant relative to low anterior resection, with cost savings of $28 500 (95% CI = $22 200 to $39 000) and incremental QALY of 0.527 (95% CI = 0.138 to 1.125). WW was also dominant relative to abdominoperineal resection, with a cost savings of $32 100 (95% CI = $21 800 to $49 200) and incremental QALY of 0.601 (95% CI = 0.213 to 1.208). WW remained dominant in sensitivity analysis unless the rate of surgical salvage fell to 73.0%. Conclusions Using current multi-institutional recurrence estimates, we observed comparable cancer-specific survival, superior quality-adjusted survival, and decreased costs with WW compared with upfront TME. Upfront TME was preferred when surgical salvage rates were low.