beef value chain
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Phillip A Lancaster ◽  
Michael E Davis ◽  
Jack J Rutledge ◽  
Larry V Cundiff

Abstract Understanding the relationships between feed efficiency traits measured in different stages of production is necessary to improve feed efficiency across the beef value chain. The objective of this study was to evaluate relationships among feed efficiency traits measured as growing heifers and breeding females and in their progeny in three full production cycles, and relationships of dam residual feed intake (RFI) with lifetime and lifecycle cow efficiency traits. Data were collected on 160 mixed-breed heifers from 240 d of age to weaning of their third progeny, and postweaning performance of progeny until harvest in experiments initiated in 1953, 1954, 1959, 1964, 1969, and 1974. Individual feed offered was recorded daily, and feed refusals measured every 28 d. Milk yield was measured at 14-d intervals throughout lactation by machine or hand milking. Females and progeny were weighed at 28-d intervals and progeny were harvested at a constant endpoint of live grade or age depending upon the experiment. Feed efficiency traits of RFI and residual BW gain (RG) were computed as the residual from linear regression for developing heifers, dams (RFI and residual energy-corrected milk (RECM)), and postweaning progeny. Feed:gain ratio (FCR) was computed for developing heifers and postweaning progeny, and feed:milk energy ratio (FME) was computed for dams. Various measures of cow efficiency were calculated on either a life cycle or lifetime basis using ratios of progeny and dam weight outputs to progeny and dam feed inputs. Pearson correlations were computed among traits adjusted for a random year-breed-diet group effect. Heifer RFI (0.74) and RG (-0.32) were correlated (P ≤ 0.05) with dam RFI in parity 1 only, but were not correlated (P > 0.05) with dam RECM in any parity. Heifer RFI was correlated (P ≤ 0.05) with progeny RFI (0.17) in parity 3 only. Heifer FCR was not correlated with dam FME or progeny FCR in any parity. Dam RFI was weakly correlated (r = 0.25 to 0.36; P ≤ 0.05) among parities, whereas dam FME and RECM were strongly correlated (r = 0.49 to 0.72; P ≤ 0.05) among parities. Dam RFI in parity 1 and 2 was weakly correlated (r = -0.20 to -0.33; P ≤ 0.05) with cow efficiency ratios that included dam weight as an output, whereas dam RFI in parity 3 was not correlated with any cow efficiency ratio. In conclusion, feed efficiency traits were poorly correlated across production segments, but moderately repeatable across production cycles.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratnaningsih Hidayati

The concept of Food Security has been introduced by the World Food Summit since 1996. In this paper, food security will be discussed in terms of halal food assurance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the beef value chain and identify which part of the chain the halal certification could be integrated. This study is conducted by qualitative analysis and focus group discussions based on the data available. The result shows that Beef consumption in Indonesia can be distinguished into two big market, the retail market and meat processor market. Retail beef market constitutes about 40% of the product and the rest (60%) goes to the meat processor. An analysis of the beef market value chain has shown that the inclusion of halal food certification could be obliged in the stage of slaughtering and meatball production.Keywords : beef, halal, value chain



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Kok ◽  
◽  
J.M. Soethoudt ◽  
D.M. Vernooij ◽  
K.B. Chowdhury


2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 127-128
Author(s):  
Jessica Baber ◽  
Jason T Sawyer ◽  
Ben Holland ◽  
Kendall Karr ◽  
Alyssa Word ◽  
...  

Abstract Net protein contribution (NPC) of the beef value chain has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the beef value chain positively contributes to NPC; however, the specific role of growth-enhancing technologies has not be evaluated. To compare effects of technology on NPC baseline, performance data from 8 commercial feedlots located in the Texas panhandle (n = 6) and Kansas (n = 2) were used to create 8 scenarios: 1) no technology (NT), 2) ionophore (ION), 3) implant (IMP), 4) beta-agonist (B), 5) ionophore and implant (ION+IMP), 6) ionophore and beta-agonist (ION+B), 7) implant and beta-agonist (IMP+B), and 8) ionophore, implant and beta-agonist (I+I+B). An IMP×B interaction was observed for human-edible protein conversion efficiency (HePCE) and NPC (P ≤ 0.03). Implants and beta-agonists increased HePCE and NPC compared to NT (P < 0.01), and IMP+B was greater than combined effects of IMP and B. Ionophore scenarios had greater HePCE and NPC compared to NT (P < 0.01). Interactions for ION×IMP and IMP×B were observed for NPC of beef value chain (P < 0.03), but an ION×B interaction was not observed (P = 0.07). All technology scenarios were lower than NT for NPC (3.21 vs 3.74, respectively; P < 0.01) because HePCE for the beef value chain was reduced when cattle were fed longer in the technology scenarios. Interactions for ION×IMP, IMP×B, and ION×B were observed for enteric CH4 production feedlot cattle (P ≤ 0.03), and a three-way interaction was observed for enteric CH4 production of the beef value chain (P < 0.01). All technologies reduced enteric CH4 produced per kg of HePg compared to NT (P < 0.01). Net protein contribution should be balanced with other indicators of sustainability for a representative understanding of technology impacts on sustainable beef production.



2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 7020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenal Asikin ◽  
Derek Baker ◽  
Renato Villano ◽  
Arief Daryanto

This paper proposes a framework for identification of business models in smallholder cattle production and marketing that represents innovation behaviour. Cattle are vital to Indonesia’s smallholders’ livelihoods, and smallholder systems are key to serving the country’s growing demand for beef. Business incentives currently select against the development and sustainability of breeding systems which would support domestic production, and so new models are needed which utilize innovation. The three primary components of a business model are presented: its value proposition, its value architecture, and its financing mechanism. A research approach is provided, by way of mapping data needs to the business models, and proposing relationships between observed innovation practices and the business models within the value chain. For implementation, the paper provides guidance on facilitation needs and the role of stakeholders in the case of the Indonesian cattle and beef value chain.



2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-16
Author(s):  
Parisa Alizadeh ◽  
◽  
HOsein Mohammadi ◽  
Naser Shahnoushi ◽  
Sayed Saghaian ◽  
...  


Agrekon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-155
Author(s):  
Abiodun Ogundeji ◽  
Frikkie Maré


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 176-183
Author(s):  
Kyayesimira Juliet ◽  
Rapheal Wangalwa ◽  
Kagoro Rugunda Grace ◽  
Kagoro Rugunda Grace ◽  
W. Matofari Joseph ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 859-870
Author(s):  
Florence Mutua ◽  
Johanna Lindahl ◽  
Delia Randolph

Abstract Consumers have a right to safer foods, and traceability is one approach to meeting their expectations. Kenya does not have an operational animal traceability system, and while a few initiatives have been piloted, these have only focused on the beef value chain. In this paper, we begin a discussion on traceability in the pig value chain, with an initial focus on smallholder systems of Western Kenya. First, a background to local pig production is given, and a description of animal identification and traceability options applicable to these systems is explained. Based on this, a “butcher-to-farm” traceability system, with health, production and food safety as objectives, is discussed. Requirements for establishing such a system (including actor incentives) are additionally discussed. The proposed approach can be piloted in the field and findings used to inform the design of a larger pilot and possibly pave way for implementation of a national traceability system, in line with the guidelines provided by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). Organized systems in the area (including commercial producer and trader groups) would offer a useful starting point.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document