Recognition of Divergent Viral Substrates by the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease

ABSTRACTThe main protease (Mpro) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is an ideal target for pharmaceutical inhibition. It is required for infection, it cleaves the viral polyprotein at multiple sites, and it is conserved among coronaviruses and distinct from human proteases. We present crystal structures of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro bound to two viral substrate peptides. The structures show how Mpro recognizes substrates and how the peptide sequence can dictate catalytic efficiency by influencing the position of the scissile bond. One peptide, constituting the junction between viral non-structural proteins 8 and 9 (nsp8/9), has P1’ and P2’ residues that are unique among SARS-CoV-2 cleavage sites but conserved among nsp8/9 junctions in coronaviruses. Mpro cleaves nsp8/9 inefficiently, and amino acid substitutions at P1’ or P2’ can enhance catalysis. Visualization of Mpro with intact substrates provides new templates for antiviral drug design and suggests that the coronavirus lifecycle selects for finely tuned substrate-dependent catalytic parameters.

Characterization of tolloid-mediated cleavage of the GDF8 procomplex

Growth differentiation factor 8 (GDF8), a.k.a. myostatin, is a member of the larger TGFβ superfamily of signaling ligands. GDF8 has been well characterized as a negative regulator of muscle mass. After synthesis, GDF8 is held latent by a noncovalent complex between the N-terminal prodomain and the signaling ligand. Activation of latent GDF8 requires proteolytic cleavage of the prodomain at residue D99 by a member of the tolloid family of metalloproteases. While tolloid proteases cleave multiple substrates, they lack a conserved consensus sequence. Here we investigate the tolloid cleavage site of the GDF8 prodomain to determine what residues contribute to tolloid recognition and subsequent proteolysis. Using sequential alanine mutations, we identified several residues adjacent to the scissile bond, including Y94, that when mutated, abolish tolloid-mediated activation of latent GDF8. Using the astacin domain of Tll1 (Tolloid Like 1) we determined that prodomain mutants were more resistant to proteolysis. Purified latent complexes harboring the prodomain mutations, D92A and Y94A, impeded activation by tolloid but could be fully activated under acidic conditions. Finally, we show that co-expression of GDF8 WT with prodomain mutants that were tolloid resistant, suppressed GDF8 activity. Taken together our data demonstrate that residues towards the N-terminus of the scissile bond are important for tolloid-mediated activation of GDF8 and that tolloid-resistant version of the GDF8 prodomain can function dominant negative to WT GDF8.

KLK4 inhibition by cyclic and acyclic peptides: structural and dynamical insights into standard-mechanism protease inhibitors

Sunflower Trypsin Inhibitor (SFTI-1) is a 14-amino acid serine protease inhibitor. The dual anti-parallel β-sheet arrangement of SFTI-1 is stabilized by a N-terminal-C-terminal backbone cyclization and a further disulfide bridge to form a final bicyclic structure. This constrained structure is further rigidified by an extensive network of internal hydrogen bonds. Thus, the structure of SFTI-1 in solution resembles the protease-bound structure, reducing the entropic penalty upon protease binding. When cleaved at the scissile bond, it is thought that the rigidifying features of SFTI-1 maintain its structure, allowing the scissile bond to be reformed. The lack of structural plasticity for SFTI-1 is proposed to favour initial protease binding and continued occupancy in the protease active site, resulting in an equilibrium between cleaved and uncleaved inhibitor in the presence of protease. We have determined, at 1.15 Å resolution, the x-ray crystal structures of complexes between human kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (KLK4) and SFTI-FCQR(Asn14), and between KLK4 and an acyclic form of the same inhibitor, SFTI-FCQR(Asn14)[1,14], with the latter displaying a cleaved scissile bond. Structural analysis and MD simulations together reveal the roles of altered contact sequence, intramolecular hydrogen bonding network and backbone cyclization, in altering the state of SFTI’s scissile bond ligation at the protease active site. Taken together, the data presented reveal insights into the role of dynamics in the standard-mechanism inhibition, and suggest that modifications on the noncontact strand may be a useful, underexplored approach for generating further potent or selective SFTI-based inhibitors against members of the serine protease family.

Linking inhibitor motions to proteolytic stability of sunflower trypsin inhibitor-1

Besides the non-bonded interactions, inhibitor motions especially rotation of the scissile bond also influence proteolytic stability.

Structural Modeling of γ-Secretase Aβn Complex Formation and Substrate Processing

The intra-membrane aspartyl protease γ-secretase (GSEC) cleaves single-span transmembrane helices including the C-terminal fragment of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). This substrate is initially cleaved at the ɛ-site followed by successive processing (trimming) events mostly in steps of three amino acids. GSEC is responsible for the formation of N-terminal APP amyloid-β (A β) peptides of different length (e.g. Aβ42) that can form aggregates involved in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. The molecular mechanism of GSEC-APP substrate recognition is key for understanding how different peptide products are formed and could help in designing APP-selective modulators. Based on the known structure of apo GSEC and the APP-C99 fragment we have generated putative structural models of the initial binding in three different possible modes using extensive Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. The binding mode with the substrate helix located in a cleft between the transmembrane helices 2 and 3 of the presenilin subunit was identified as a most likely binding mode. Based on this arrangement the processing steps were investigated using restraint MD simulations to pull the scissile bond (for each processing step) into a transition like (cleavable) state. This allowed us to analyze in detail the motions and energetic contributions of participating residues. The structural model agrees qualitatively well with the influence of many mutations in GSEC and C99. It also explains the effects of inhibitors, cross-linking as well as spectroscopic data on GSEC substrate binding and can serve as working model for the future planning of structural and biochemical studies.

HIV-1 Protease Uses Bi-Specific S2/S2’ Subsites To Optimize Cleavage of Two Classes of Target Sites

Retroviral proteases (PR) have a unique specificity that allows cleavage of sites with or without a P1’ proline. A P1’ proline is required at the MA/CA cleavage site due to its role in a post-cleavage conformational change in the capsid protein. However, the HIV-1 PR prefers to have large hydrophobic amino acids flanking the scissile bond, suggesting PR recognizes two different classes of substrate sequences. We analyzed the cleavage rate of over 150 iterations of six different HIV-1 cleavage sites to explore rate determinants of cleavage. We found that cleavage rates are strongly influenced by the two amino acids flanking the amino acids at the scissile bond (P2-P1/P1’-P2’), with two complementary sets of rules. When P1’ is proline, the P2 side chain interacts with a polar region in the S2 subsite of the PR, while the P2’ amino acid interacts with a hydrophobic region of the S2’ subsite. When P1’ is not proline, the orientations of the P2 and P2’ side chains with respect to the scissile bond are reversed; P2 residues interact with a hydrophobic face of the S2 subsite while the P2’ amino acid usually engages hydrophilic amino acids in the S2’ subsite. These results reveal that the HIV-1 PR has evolved bi-functional S2 and S2’ subsites to accommodate the steric effects imposed by a P1’ proline on the orientation of P2 and P2’ substrate side chains. These results also suggest a new strategy for inhibitor design to engage the multiple specificities in these subsites.

Prediction of the closed conformation and insights into the mechanism of the membrane enzyme LpxR

ABSTRACTCovalent modification of outer membrane lipids of Gram-negative bacteria can impact the ability of the bacterium to develop resistance to antibiotics as well as modulating the immune response of the host. The enzyme LpxR from Salmonella typhimurium is known to deacylate lipopolysaccharide molecules of the outer membrane, however the mechanism of action is unknown. Here we employ Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations to study the conformational dynamics and substrate binding of LpxR in representative outer membrane models and also detergent micelles. We examine the roles of conserved residues and provide an understanding of how LpxR binds its substrate. Our simulations predict that the catalytic H122 must be Nε-protonated for a single water molecule to occupy the space between it and the scissile bond, with a free binding energy of -8.5 kcal mol-1. Furthermore, simulations of the protein within a micelle enable us to predict the structure of the putative ‘closed’ protein. Our results highlight the need for including dynamics, a representative environment and the consideration of multiple tautomeric and rotameric states of key residues in mechanistic studies; static structures alone do not tell the full story.

Timeliness of Proteolytic Events Is Prerequisite for Efficient Functioning of the Alphaviral Replicase

ABSTRACTPolyprotein processing has an important regulatory role in the life cycle of positive-strand RNA viruses. In the case of alphaviruses, sequential cleavage of the nonstructural polyprotein (ns-polyprotein) at three sites eventually yields four mature nonstructural proteins (nsPs) that continue working in complex to replicate viral genomic RNA and transcribe subgenomic RNA. Recognition of cleavage sites by viral nsP2 protease is guided by short sequences upstream of the scissile bond and, more importantly, by the spatial organization of the replication complex. In this study, we analyzed the consequences of the artificially accelerated processing of the Semliki Forest virus ns-polyprotein. It was found that in mammalian cells, not only the order but also the correct timing of the cleavage events is essential for the success of viral replication. Analysis of the effects of compensatory mutations in rescued viruses as well asin vitrotranslation andtrans-replicase assays corroborated our findings and revealed the importance of the V515 residue in nsP2 for recognizing the P4 position in the nsP1/nsP2 cleavage site. We also extended our conclusions to Sindbis virus by analyzing the properties of the hyperprocessive variant carrying the N614D mutation in nsP2. We conclude that the sequence of the nsP1/nsP2 site in alphaviruses is under selective pressure to avoid the presence of sequences that are recognized too efficiently and would otherwise lead to premature cleavage at this site before completion of essential tasks of RNA synthesis or virus-induced replication complex formation. Even subtle changes in the ns-polyprotein processing pattern appear to lead to virus attenuation.IMPORTANCEThe polyprotein expression strategy is a cornerstone of alphavirus replication. Three sites within the ns-polyprotein are recognized by the viral nsP2 protease and cleaved in a defined order. Specific substrate targeting is achieved by the recognition of the short sequence upstream of the scissile bond and a correct macromolecular assembly of ns-polyprotein. Here, we highlighted the importance of the timeliness of proteolytic events, as an additional layer of regulation of efficient virus replication. We conclude that, somewhat counterintuitively, the cleavage site sequences at the nsP1/nsP2 and nsP2/nsP3 junctions are evolutionarily selected to be recognized by protease inefficiently, to avoid premature cleavages that would be detrimental for the assembly and functionality of the replication complex. Understanding the causes and consequences of viral polyprotein processing events is important for predicting the properties of mutant viruses and should be helpful for the development of better vaccine candidates and understanding potential mechanisms of resistance to protease inhibitors.

Evolutionary Selection on Barrier Activity: Bar1 Is an Aspartyl Protease with Novel Substrate Specificity

ABSTRACTPeptide-based pheromones are used throughout the fungal kingdom for coordinating sexual responses between mating partners. Here, we address the properties and function of Bar1, an aspartyl protease that acts as a “barrier” and antagonist to pheromone signaling in multiple species.Candida albicansBar1 was purified and shown to exhibit preferential cleavage of native α pheromone over pheromones from related fungal species. This result establishes that protease substrate specificity coevolved along with changes in its pheromone target. Pheromone cleavage by Bar1 occurred between residues Thr-5 and Asn-6 in the middle of the tridecapeptide sequence. Surprisingly, proteolytic activity was independent of the amino acid residues present at the scissile bond and instead relied on residues at the C terminus of α pheromone. Unlike most aspartyl proteases, Bar1 also exhibited a near-neutral pH optimum and was resistant to the class-wide inhibitor pepstatin A. In addition, genetic analysis was performed onC. albicansBAR1and demonstrated that the protease not only regulates endogenous pheromone signaling but also can limit interspecies pheromone signaling. We discuss these findings and propose that the unusual substrate specificity of Bar1 is a consequence of its coevolution with the α pheromone receptor Ste2 for their shared peptide target.IMPORTANCEPheromones are important for intraspecies communication across the tree of life. In the fungal kingdom, extracellular proteases play a key role in antagonizing pheromone signaling in multiple species. This study examines the properties and function ofCandida albicansBar1, an aspartyl protease that cleaves and thereby inactivates α pheromone. We demonstrate that Bar1 plays important roles in regulating both intra- and interspecies pheromone signaling. The fungal protease shows preferential activity on the endogenous pheromone, but, surprisingly, cleavage activity is dependent on amino acid residues distal to the scissile bond. We propose that the unusual substrate specificity of Bar1 is a direct result of coevolution with Ste2, the receptor for α pheromone, for recognition of the same peptide target. The novel specificity of Bar1 reveals the complex forces shaping the evolution of mating pathways in fungi and uncovers a protease with potentially important applications in the biotechnology industry.