scholarly journals Treatment of FRI after intramedullary nailing of tibia fractures: assessment of nail retention and nail removal

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna Jones ◽  
Brian Mullis ◽  
Bree Weaver ◽  
Roman Natoli
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Multiple Parameters ◽  
Initial Fixation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Primary Bone ◽  
Primary Union ◽  
Nail Removal

Objectives: Fracture related infection (FRI) is a severe, potentially limb-threatening complication after fracture fixation. Dilemma exists with regard to removing or retaining implants while treating the infection. The purpose of this study was to compare primary bone union and infection clearance in patients who had an infection following intramedullary nailing of the tibia treated either by retaining the implant or by removing the implant.    Methods: Patients from two level-I trauma centers were identified through billing registries and retrospectively reviewed between January 2013 and December 2020. We identified 44 patients who had a diagnosis of FRI within 90 days of their initial fixation and returned to the OR for operative treatment of the infection. The incidences of both primary union and infection clearance were calculated for both groups and multiple parameters that may be associated with success or failure were assessed.     Results: Four patients did not have complete records and were excluded. Of the remaining patients, 20 (50%) achieved infection clearance. Twenty-three (59%) patients achieved primary union whereas 16 (41%) had a primary outcome of either delayed union, nonunion, or amputation (one additional patient excluded as healing status unknown). Further analysis showed no significant difference (X2 (39) = 1.13, p < .29) in infection clearance between patients treated with nail retention (64%) versus nail removal (68%). No significant difference was seen in primary bone union (X2 (39) = 3.24, p < .07) with 36% of patients treated with nail retention and 68% of patients treated with nail removal reaching primary union; however, this does trend toward an association. Fewer surgeries performed for infection and complication after initial fixation was positively associated with infection clearance (p < .04, M=4.6, SD=2.13, df=39) and primary union (p < .001, M=4, SD=2, df=38).    Conclusion: Infection clearance seems similarly possible with both nail retention and nail removal strategies, with fewer number of surgeries performed for infection and complication improving the likelihood of infection clearance and bone union. This may suggest that more severe FRI’s are less likely to unite and clear infection. Nail removal may play a role in increasing primary bone union; however, a larger sample size is needed for more definitive assessment.  

scholarly journals Study on Percutaneous Intramedullary Nailing In Adult Diaphyseal Humeral Fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 207-211
Author(s):  
Mohsin Aijaz Soomro ◽  
Ajmal Khan Silro ◽  
Raheel Akbar Baloch ◽  
Najeeb Ur. Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Faraz Jokhio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate close fixation techniques for fractures of humerus via percutaneous intramedullary nailing. Methodology: This was a prospective study, carried out in Suleman Roshan Medical College Tando Adam Pakistan from January 2019 to January 2020. About 60 patients with humeral shaft fractures were made part of this study with a follow-up period of about 1 to 2 years. The inclusion criteria were humeral fractures that were of less than 7 days prior to surgery, the displacement of fracture >20° in sagittal as well as coronal plane, and the distance measuring >2cm between the two fragments. All patients were treated via the closed fixation technique. Multiple nails that were slender as well as flexible (3-5) were used in the close fixation technique including rush nails (45 patients) and ender nails (15 patients). All the patients within their follow-up periods were evaluated for ROM, pain, or any kind of deformity, and all the patients were assessed radiographically to check the process of bone union. Results: The outcome was analyzed before implant i.e at six months and after the implant was removed. About 86% patients (n= 52) revealed satisfactory outcomes at six months. About 5 patients revealed non-union or delayed union that was healed after 2nd surgery of bone grafting in 3 patients and injections associated with bone marrow in 2 patients. Stiffening of the shoulder was found to be a frequent complication that decreased significantly when the position of nail insertion was changed during the research. Conclusion: The technique of intramedullary nailing displayed many benefits including minimum tissue stress, a quick surgery time, decreased period of hospital stay, and rapid bone union.

scholarly journals Semi-extended Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia Using an Infrapatellar Approach

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Lu ◽  
Yi-jun Gao ◽  
Hong-zhen Wang ◽  
Zhi-qiang Wu ◽  
Chong Li
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Tibial Shaft ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

Abstract Background The semi-extended tibial intramedullary nailing method would enable easier and improved reductions for tibial fractures as well as facilitate fluoroscopic imaging; however, its in-articular nature remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of the semi-extended infrapatellar (SEIP) approach and hyper-flexed infrapatellar (HFIP) approach for intramedullary nailing to treat tibial shaft fractures.MethodsThis study involved the retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with tibial shaft fractures that were fixed through either the SEIP approach or the HFIP approach of intramedullary nailing and who were admitted to a level 1 trauma center. The minimum patient follow-up period was 12 months and the clinical and functional outcomes were estimated at the 12-month visit. ResultsOf the 80 patients whose medical records were analyzed, 40 (50%) underwent SEIP nailing and the remaining 40 (50%) underwent the traditional HFIP nailing. Compared with the HFIP group, patients in the SEIP group had a higher Lysholm knee score (median, 92 [interquartile range, 88-95] vs median, 88 [interquartile range, 81-92]; p = .01), a shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time (median, 93 [interquartile range, 78-105] s, vs median, 136 [interquartile range, 110-157] s; p < .001), and operation time (mean, 88.1 [SD, 17.8] min vs mean, 98.7 [SD, 19.3] min; p = .01). The VAS score was significantly lower in the SEIP group (median, 0; interquartile range, 0-0) than in the HFIP group (median, 0; interquartile range, 0-2) (p = .03). There were two cases (5%) in the SEIP group and 10 cases (25%) in the HFIP group of moderate AKP (p = .03). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in malalignment, nonunion, delayed union, infection, and other complications, as well as SF-36 physical and mental scores.ConclusionWe found that the SEIP approach to tibia intramedullary nailing was superior to the HFIP approach based on the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Thus, this novel technique provides an infrapatellar option for semi-extended tibial nailing.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLOSED REDUCTION AND EXPERT TIBIA NAILING WITH OPEN REDUCTION AND PLATE & SCREW FIXATION IN THE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL TIBIA EXTRAARTICULAR FRACTURES

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Pandey ◽  
Setul Shah ◽  
Deepak S Maravi ◽  
S Uikey
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Proximal Tibia ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction:- Extra-articular proximal tibial fractures account for 5–10 % of all tibial shaft fractures and it result from high-velocity trauma. Closed reduction with minimally invasive plating and locked intramedullary  nailing have been widely used for treatment of proximal tibia extraarticular fractures. Our pupose is to compare the pros and cons of these two methods. Materials and methods:- 22 patients were included in this study for a period of 2 years. Patients treated with IMN were kept in group A patients treated with percutaneus plating were kept in group B. Standard approach of nailing and plating were used and proper follow up were taken for next upcoming 1 year. Results:- Combined average age was 38years. Male were more commonly affected than female (13:8). Majority of fracture were of type A33. Operative time was < 2 hours in both groups. Less blood loss occurred during intramedullary nailing as compared to locking plate fixation. Surgical site infections (SSIs) were seen in two patients in the PTP group. Delayed union occurred in two patients in the IMN group. The average range of motion was 119.7(range 90-150, SD= 19.18) in group A and 115.2(range 80-150, SD = 17.28) in group B. Conclusion:- in treatment of proximal tibia extra articular fracture use of IMN and PTLCP gives comparable results. To validate this issue further a large sample size multicentric study is recommended   Key words: intramedullary nailing (IMN), Extraarticular tibialn fracture, Surgical site infection.

scholarly journals Reconstructive Approaches in Surgical Management of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 4132
Author(s):  
Andrea Laufer ◽  
Adrien Frommer ◽  
Georg Gosheger ◽  
Robert Roedl ◽  
Frank Schiedel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Union Rate ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Primary Bone ◽  
Group B

Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia remains a major challenge in pediatric orthopedics. Ideal timing and preference of surgical procedures are discussed controversially. A variety of reconstructive treatment strategies have been described in literature, but so far none has proven its superiority. The aim of treatment is to obtain long-term bone union, to prevent refracture, and to correct angular deformities and leg length discrepancies. This study retrospectively evaluates the outcome of different reconstructive strategies. Sixty-nine patients were identified who presented to our outpatient department between 1997 and 2019. Twenty-six of these patients underwent reconstructive surgical treatment and were included in this study. The study cohort was divided into three groups. Excision of the pseudarthrosis was performed in all patients in Group A and B, and in two patients of Group C. Group A (six/26 patients) received subsequent bone transport through external fixation maintaining original length. In Group B (15/26 patients), patients underwent either previous, simultaneous, or subsequent extrafocal lengthening through external fixation to reconstitute length. In Group C (five/26 patients), internal fixation with intramedullary nails was applied. Radiological and clinical evaluation was performed to assess bone union and complication rates. Results varied considerably between the study groups. Overall, the primary bone fusion rate was 69.2%. There were four refractures, all occurring in Group B. The long-term bone union rate without refracture was 53.8%. The overall complication rate was 53.8% and 23.1% showed persistent pseudarthrosis. Two secondary amputations were performed due to failed bone fusion. In conclusion, excision of the pseudarthrosis and extrafocal lengthening achieves a satisfying bone union rate and limb reconstruction, while bone transport does not offer significant advantages but shows higher complication rates. Intramedullary stabilization should be applied to maintain bone union, but shows lower bone union rates when used as a stand-alone treatment regimen. Regardless of the primary bone fusion rates, the probability of long-term bone union remains unpredictable.

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Trial of the Clinical Recovery and Biodegradation of Polylactide-co-glycolide Implants Used in the Intramedullary Nailing of Children’s Forearm Shaft Fractures with at Least Four Years of Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 995
Author(s):  
Marja Perhomaa ◽  
Tytti Pokka ◽  
Linda Korhonen ◽  
Antti Kyrö ◽  
Jaakko Niinimäki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Intramedullary Nails ◽  
Metal Implants ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Significant Difference

The preferred surgical fixation of forearm shaft fractures in children is Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN). Due to known disadvantageous effects of metal implants, a new surgical method using biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) intramedullary nails has been developed but its long-term outcomes are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of Biodegradable Intramedullary Nailing (BIN) to ESIN and assess the biodegradation of the study implants via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The study population of the prospective, randomized trial consisted of paediatric patients whose forearm shaft fractures were treated with BIN (n = 19) or ESIN (n = 16). Forearm rotation at minimally four years’ follow-up was the main outcome. There was no clinically significant difference in the recovery of the patients treated with the BIN as compared to those treated with the ESIN. More than half of the implants (57.7%, n = 15/26) were completely degraded, and the rest were degraded almost completely. The PLGA intramedullary nails used in the treatment of forearm shaft fractures in this study resulted in good function and anatomy. No unexpected disadvantages were found in the degradation of the implants. However, two implant failures had occurred in three months postoperatively.

scholarly journals Miniplate 1.5 fixation for the repair of mandibular osteotomies in cats

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adelina Maria da Silva ◽  
Wilson Machado de Souza ◽  
Patrícia de Athayde Barnabé ◽  
Marion Burkhardt de Koivisto ◽  
Nair Trevizan Machado de Souza
Keyword(s):  
Radiolucent Line ◽  
The Body ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Dental Occlusion ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Osteotomy Line ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Adult Cats ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: To evaluate the application of the maxillofacial miniplate 1.5 in the repair of unilateral mandibular osteotomies in cats. Methods: Twelve adult cats were divided into two groups. In group 1 (n=6), the osteotomy was performed in the body of the mandible, behind the 1st molar. In group 2 (n=6), the osteotomy was performed between the 4th premolar and 1st molar. The osteotomy was fixed with a titanium miniplate 1.5. Oral alimentation was reinitiated 24 hours after surgery. Cats were euthanized at 12 weeks postoperative. Results: Radiographs taken 1 week after surgery showed a radiolucent line. The osteotomy line was not more visible on the radiographs taken at 12 weeks postoperative. Macroscopic examination confirmed alignment and bone union of operated hemimandibles. Histological examination showed formation of woven bone within the osteotomy line. The percentage of bone tissue at these areas was measured by the histometry. There was no statistically significant difference between the values of group 1(75.07 ± 5.99) and group 2 (74.76 ± 8.54) (Mann-Whitney's test p= 0.469). Conclusion: We concluded that the use of miniplate 1.5 for the fixation of mandibular osteotomy in cats provided the main goals in the treatment of mandibular fractures: bone union, normal dental occlusion and immediate return to oral alimentation.

scholarly journals Distal Tibia Metaphyseal Fractures: Which is Better, Intra-medullary Nailing or Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Kawalkar Abhijit Chandrakant ◽  
Badole Chandrashekher Martand
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Distal Tibia ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Early Weight Bearing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Tibia Fractures ◽  
Distal Tibia Fractures

Introduction Tibia fractures are the most common long bone fractures encountered by the orthopedic surgeons and distal tibia fractures have the second highest incidence of all tibia fractures after the middle third of tibia the distal tibial fractures are unique and are considered as most challenging fractures to treat due to its proximity to the ankle joint and its superficial nature. The objective of this study is to compare two osteosynthesis systems developed for surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: the intramedullary nailing and the MIPPO technique. Methods The study was conducted between Jan 2011 to Dec 2012. 63 patients with extra-articular distal tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing and MIPPO technique were reviewed retrospectively and clinical outcome was evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score. Results 31 patients were treated with intramedullary nail & 32 with MIPPO technique. Fibular fixation was done in cases where fibular fracture was at or below the level of tibial fractures. We found no difference in terms of time for fracture union, mal-union, non-union, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss. But there was significant difference in terms of infection and duration of hospital stay. Also weight bearing was possible much earlier in intramedullary group as compared to the MIPPO group. Conclusion Thus we conclude that intramedullary nailing is better choice of implant in patients with extra- articular distal tibia fractures & helps in early weight bearing and ambulation of patient with fewer complications.

scholarly journals Functional Outcome of Intramedullary Nailing with Rush Pin for Pediatric Both Bone Fractures of Forearm in Western Hilly Nepal

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Rahul Shrestha ◽  
Subin Byanjankar ◽  
Rajeev Dwivedi ◽  
Ruban Raj Joshi ◽  
Mahesh Raj Ghimire
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Western World ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elastic Nails ◽  
Mean Time

Introduction: Both bone diaphysis fracture of forearm is common in children of hilly area in Nepal because the children climbs tree and cliff for playing and cutting grass. Close reduction and casting is the preferred method of treatment these fractures but the chances of re-displacement is very high. Intramedullary nailing with titanium elastic nails or rush pins is widely accepted these days with good outcome. Titanium nails are popular in western world but is costly whereas rush pins are cheap and are preferred in developing world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of intramedullary rush pin for pediatric both bone fracture of forearm. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study done from 1st of February 2017 to 31st of March 2017, a total of sixty patients with both bone fractures of forearm were treated with intramedullary rush pin and followed up for six months for evaluation of functional outcome. T-test and Chi-square tests were done. Results: Closed reduction and internal fixation was done in 48 (80%) patients. Mean age of the patients was 9.23 year (SD=2.77). Fifty-six (93.3%) patients were male with a significant difference (p<0.001). With price et al. grading system, 49 (81.7%) patients had excellent results, nine (15%) had good and two (3.3%) patients had fair results. There was no major complication. Mean time to implant removal was 24.16 weeks (SD=1.62) from the time of surgery with range of 20 to 28 weeks. Among transverse and oblique fractures, patients with transverse fracture were likely to have better outcome (p=0.04). Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing with rush pin gives excellent to good functional outcome in majority of the cases without major complications at low cost for management of both bone fractures of forearm in children.

scholarly journals Tetracalcium Phosphate Treatment on Experimental Fracture Model in Rats

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Kaymaz ◽  
Onur Yılmaz ◽  
Ali Osman Taşova ◽  
Doğukan Anapa
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Albino Rats ◽  
Left Femur ◽  
Tetracalcium Phosphate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Additional Procedure ◽  
Phosphate Treatment ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Wistar Albino Rats

Abstract Background: Studies have shown that bioactive cements have beneficial bone-forming effects. Our objective in the present study is to investigate the efficacy of tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) on fracture healing in rat femur.Materials and methods: Forty-two female Wistar Albino rats randomized into two groups (groups 1 and 2, n=21 for each). The left femur of all animals was fractured by osteotomy after deep anesthesia with ketamine. Additional procedure was not applied to the rats in group 1. Rats in Group 2, following osteotomy were applied to the fracture line approximately 2 cc TTCP. The animals were sacrificed on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd post-operative weeks (each week 7 animals were sacrificed from each group) and the broken femur were removed. The femur were examined first radiographically and second, histopathologically.Results: Radiologically, callus maturity and bone union increased with time in both groups. But no significant differences were found regarding callus maturity and bone union in weekly comparisons (Anteroposterior plain: p:0.53, p:0.37, p:0.42, Lateral plain p:0.26, p:0.42, p:0.87). Histopathologically, the fractures healed normally as the weeks progressed in both groups. In the comparison of both groups, no significant difference was found outside the 1st week, although the histological scores of group 2, who were treated for all weeks, were higher in terms of fracture healing (p:0,024, p:104,p:462).Conclusions: Although no significant difference was found in the comparison of both groups except for the first week, the histological scores of the group 2 who received TTCP in all weeks were higher in terms of fracture healing. According to the results of this study, we think that TTCP can be useful especially in the early stages of fracture healing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document