correct code
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
Egnar Özdikililer

In this study, Data Binding is discussed. However, in Web technologies, data binding on the front end comes to the fore. That is, it should not be affected by the development of interventions to be made in a department, and it should be aimed to be freed from software. This is a requirement of the rules for a minimal plugin that will not burden the correct code, and it has to maintain itself as renewing itself. The application part is written in JavaScript. The work done is also available to be added to other applications as a library. "Real software applications" as Data Binding are written with this object for the purpose of interconnecting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (OOPSLA) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Kia Rahmani ◽  
Mohammad Raza ◽  
Sumit Gulwani ◽  
Vu Le ◽  
Daniel Morris ◽  
...  

Multi-modal program synthesis refers to the task of synthesizing programs (code) from their specification given in different forms, such as a combination of natural language and examples. Examples provide a precise but incomplete specification, and natural language provides an ambiguous but more "complete" task description. Machine-learned pre-trained models (PTMs) are adept at handling ambiguous natural language, but struggle with generating syntactically and semantically precise code. Program synthesis techniques can generate correct code, often even from incomplete but precise specifications, such as examples, but they are unable to work with the ambiguity of natural languages. We present an approach that combines PTMs with component-based synthesis (CBS): PTMs are used to generate candidates programs from the natural language description of the task, which are then used to guide the CBS procedure to find the program that matches the precise examples-based specification. We use our combination approach to instantiate multi-modal synthesis systems for two programming domains: the domain of regular expressions and the domain of CSS selectors. Our evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of our domain-agnostic approach in comparison to a state-of-the-art specialized system, and the generality of our approach in providing multi-modal program synthesis from natural language and examples in different programming domains.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (91) ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Olga V. Ratanova ◽  

The article discusses the issues of automated teaching of programming. Programming is one of the fastest growing and promising industries in the modern world. Based on information from recruitment agencies, there is now a shortage of highly specialized programmers, and it will only increase. Currently, employers have increased requirements for the qualification of programmers. Therefore, teaching programming in courses or advanced training of programmers is especially relevant. Automation makes learning more affordable. The role of automated learning on-line is increasing at this time. The article analyzes the principles of construction and typical elements of existing training courses. And it also analyzes methods of increasing the efficiency automated learning that can be done online. Creating circumstances under which the student received the necessary practical skills is an actual issue with such training. These are the skills of writing and debugging correct code in a programming language in the absence or with minimal presence of a teacher. Checking the code by the teacher, searching for errors and identifying inefficient code is an important point in full-time programming training. At this point, the student receives quick feedback from the teacher. Training tasks should be created so that code validation can be performed automatically. The article suggests changes and additions that will increase the effectiveness of existing automated courses of teaching of programming. The analysis of existing software code verification systems was performed. And the verification methods that are applicable in training were identified. Automatic verification of program code can take learning to a new higher level.


2021 ◽  
pp. 875-882
Author(s):  
Yangqi Zhang ◽  
Zhirui Kuai ◽  
Wenjin Yao ◽  
Zhiyang Zhang ◽  
Li Kuang
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Stram ◽  
Tony Gigliotti ◽  
Douglas Hartman ◽  
Andrea Pitkus ◽  
Stanley M. Huff ◽  
...  

Context.— The Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) system is supposed to facilitate interoperability, and it is the federally required code for exchanging laboratory data. Objective.— To provide an overview of LOINC, emerging issues related to its use, and areas relevant to the pathology laboratory, including the subtleties of test code selection and importance of mapping the correct codes to local test menus. Data Sources.— This review is based on peer-reviewed literature, federal regulations, working group reports, the LOINC database (version 2.65), experience using LOINC in the laboratory at several large health care systems, and insight from laboratory information system vendors. Conclusions.— The current LOINC database contains more than 55 000 numeric codes specific for laboratory tests. Each record in the LOINC database includes 6 major axes/parts for the unique specification of each individual observation or measurement. Assigning LOINC codes to a laboratory's test menu should be a defined process. In some cases, LOINC can aid in distinguishing laboratory data among different information systems, whereby such benefits are not achievable by relying on the laboratory test name alone. Criticisms of LOINC include the complexity and resource-intensive process of selecting the most correct code for each laboratory test, the real-world experience that these codes are not uniformly assigned across laboratories, and that 2 tests that may have the same appropriately assigned LOINC code may not necessarily have equivalency to permit interoperability of their result data. The coding system's limitations, which subsequently reduce the potential utility of LOINC, are poorly understood outside of the laboratory.


Author(s):  
Philemon Daniel

This book comes in two parts. The first edition provides the fundamentals and basic verilog designs to start with establishing a through foundation. This book simplifies the switch from digital fundamentals to an ASIC or a VLSI circuit design. Verilog is discussed alongside hardware components explaining the link between writing the correct code to thinking the right hardware. The reader is also encouraged to think of code given a certain hardware. Stripping off the redundant content, a code based approach to learning circuit design is presented in this edition.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 298-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Long ◽  
Martin Rinard
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document