Diagnosis performs a useful function because it allows us to classify patients into groups. This enables us to: … ● study diagnostic groups, so that we can learn more about aetiology, prognosis, risks, and treatment through research; ● communicate briefly but effectively with other healthcare professionals about a specific patient— rather than having to list the specific features in every case, we have a convenient shorthand; ● predict the likely aetiology, prognosis, risks, and effective treatments in a specific patient, based on evidence from other people with that diagnosis. The process of diagnosis in mental health is not universally accepted as being appropriate. This stems from concerns that diagnosis: … ● labels people with mental illness with names that may be unhelpful and stigmatizing, such as ‘personality disorder’ or ‘schizophrenia’; ● excessively simplifies the details of a particular person’s predicament, so that a person’s uniqueness is not acknowledged; ● relies upon an understanding of illness (existing classification systems) that does not reflect real illness categories, and therefore has low validity; ● relies upon the interpretation of the individual clinician, and therefore has low reliability— clinicians presented with the same information (the same patient) may draw different diagnostic conclusions…. We would argue that the rationale for diagnosis is strong, that no realistic alternative exists, and that the advantages of this approach far outweigh the disadvantages. When diagnostic assessment is conducted thoroughly and appropriately, it focuses very much on the detail of the patient’s psychological, physical, and social situation, and emphasizes the particular aspects of an individual’s case. It is therefore crucial that, when you are presenting a case, you stress those points, so that your case description is rich and individual, rather than being bland and general. The former reflects a real, unique person; the latter reflects a textbook description. In psychiatry, diagnosis is rarely just one simple term describing the patient’s medical situation. As we have seen so far while considering assessment, there is usually more than one issue, and sometimes many, whether within the biological, psychological, or social domains. This complexity needs to be reflected in the shorthand of diagnosis. One way in which psychiatric diagnosis has achieved this in an ordered way is by adopting a multiaxial classification, in which several axes reflect different aspects of the patient’s situation.