The East India Company (1661–1698): Territorial Acquisition and the ‘Amsterdam of Liberty’

The final chapter highlights the differences in global corporate governance, providing a case study of how differing governing models could ensure corporate success rather than failure. It continues the story of the EIC’s evolving religious governance in the second half of the century. It investigates how, following the acquisition of Bombay in the 1660s, company leaders such as Strenysham Master, Gerald Aungier and Josiah Child, developed the company’s religious governance to deal with administrating over a variety of peoples and faiths. Following 1662, in the post-Braganza era of the EIC, the flexibility of the corporate form was accentuated because of its adoption of an ecumenically broad form of governance, which allowed it to establish government over not only English Protestants but also Catholics, Armenians, Hindus, Muslims and Jews. The chapter also investigates the role of passive evangelism in the EIC’s religious governance as a way to encourage conversion. In doing so, the company hoped to bring local Indians not only into the Protestant faith, but under the English government.

On Being in a Quandary

This chapter addresses three problems: the problem of formulating a coherent relativism, the Sorites paradox, and a seldom noticed difficulty in the best intuitionistic case for the revision of classical logic. A response to the latter is proposed which, generalized, contributes towards the solution of the other two. The key to this response is a generalized conception of indeterminacy as a specific kind of intellectual bafflement—Quandary. Intuitionistic revisions of classical logic are merited wherever a subject matter is conceived both as liable to generate Quandary and as subject to a broad form of evidential constraint. So motivated, the distinctions enshrined in intuitionistic logic provide both for a satisfying resolution of the Sorites paradox and a coherent outlet for relativistic views about, for example, matters of taste and morals. An important corollary of the discussion is that an epistemic conception of vagueness can be prised apart from the strong metaphysical realism with which its principal supporters have associated it, and acknowledged to harbour an independent insight.

Relationship between Undernutrition and Periodontal Diseases among a sample of Yemeni Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Undernutrition is an inadequate supply of energy and nutrients. Periodontal diseases (PDs) are defined as a broad form of chronic inflammatory disease of the gingiva, bone and ligaments supporting the teeth. This study aimed to reveal the relationship between undernutrition, using body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin level (Alb), and PDs in a sample of Yemeni population. A cross-sectional study was conducted at dental teaching clinics at the Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University. Of the 1920 patients attended to clinics, only 229 matched the study criteria. Oral examination was performed to assess the periodontal clinical parameters measurements. BMI and Alb was measured. (58.5%) of participants were males and most of the study sample (91.3%) was at the age group of (18–35). Regarding to habits, only (18.2%) of patients were smokers and more than half of participants (59.4%) were khat chewers. Among all participants, (81.2%) of cases were diagnosed with gingivitis. (60.7%) of study participants were mildly undernourished according to BMI. (93%) of participants showed normal Alb level. BMI and albumin level were non significantly associated with PDs. Mild malnutrition was the most frequent category in the patients diagnosed with gingivitis. In conclusion, There was a relationship between PDs and undernutrition which was clearly seen between mild undernutrition and gingivitis.

Harvested Microalgal Biomass from Different Water Treatment Facilities—Its Characteristics and Potential Use as Renewable Sources of Plant Biostimulation

Surface characteristics, physicochemical properties, functional groups, and bioactive compounds of microalgal biomass (MB) samples harvested from various wastewater treatment facilities (WTFs) were investigated to evaluate the reuse feasibility of MB as a potential renewable source of plant biostimulation. Mixtures of the microalgae cells and fine particles (i.e., silt, clay, suspended solids, extracellular organic matter, humus substances, natural organic matter, etc.) were complexed inside MB samples. MB samples harvested and air-dried under natural conditions investigated in this study can have relatively well-preserved cellular morphology as well as chemical substances such as carbohydrates, proteins, and fatty acids based on SEM-EDS analysis. A broad form of the amorphous cellulose rather than a distinct crystalline was observed from FTIR analysis, indicating that the middle spectrum of glucose and starch hydrolysate exist in MB samples. A wide array of chemicals (i.e., Undecane; Heptadecane; Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester; and Methyl stearate, phenolics, and fatty acids) extracted from MB samples were involved in signaling plant response to abiotic stress, plant growth and biomass with MB samples were greater than those without MB samples. Thus, mixtures of nutrients, minerals and algal biomass in wet and dried MB samples can be beneficially reused as biostimulants in agricultural area after simple processes such as composting, microbial fermentation, and extraction. Further study is warranted to elucidate the effect of useful ingredients in MB harvested from on-site coagulation/flocculation processes on the soil environment as bio-fertilizers.

Part VI Discovery and Document Production, 16 Discovery in Arbitration: Can Parties Use 28 USC § 1782 to Circumvent the Process Ordered by the Arbitral Tribunal?

This chapter focuses on Section 1782 of Title 28 of the United States Code (USC). One of the stated purposes of 28 USC § 1782 (‘section 1782’) is to provide ‘judicial assistance to foreign or international tribunals’. However, the profound differences between the broad form of discovery available under section 1782 and the narrow form of discovery generally available in international arbitration may create the possibility of conflicts between the process envisioned by the arbitral tribunal and the process made available to parties by the US judiciary. It argues that section 1782 is subject to a strong presumption in favour of discovery. When a foreign litigant wants discovery, but the foreign tribunal may not, courts typically err on the side of the foreign litigant.