The Effects of the Judgment of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19, C- 397/19.The Obligation of the Decisions of the Romanian Constitutional Court and the Supremacy of EU

The supremacy of the Constitution is therefore compatible with the application systems that give application preference to regulations from legislation other than national law, as long as the Constitution itself established this provision, which happens exactly with the provision provided in art. 93, which allows the transfer of powers resulting from the Constitution in favor of an international institution thus constitutionally empowered to regulate matters previously reserved for domestic powers and their application.

Legal Person Subject to Civil Law

The legal person, now a distinct institution in its own right, regulated as such in the Romanian Civil Code, is the result of a long process of modernisation of Romanian legislation, but also of its harmonisation with international regulations which unanimously recognise the legal person as a subject of law. The notion of legal person was born in private law and has been and is used in all branches of law. Legal persons are distinct subjects in civil law or commercial law legal relationships. The legal person is a subject of law with a wide scope in the legal circuit. Commercial companies, autonomous companies, companies, are participants as legal persons in private law relationships. Legal persons are the entities provided for by law, as well as any other legally-established organisations which, although not declared by law to be legal persons, fulfill all the conditions provided for by the Civil Code and the relevant legislation. The present article aims to present the specific rules for the establishment and functioning of a legal person, as well as issues related to classifications and constituent elements, and to their liability for legal acts or deeds performed.

Practical Application of the Provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure Regarding the Measure of Preventive Arrest

Preventive measures are coercive criminal law enforcement institutions, aimed at the deprivation or restriction of individual liberty, by which the suspect or defendant is prevented from undertaking certain activities that would adversely affect the conduct of the criminal proceedings or the achievement of its purpose. They have been instituted by the legislator for specific purposes, namely: to ensure the proper conduct of criminal proceedings, to prevent the abstraction of the suspect or defendant from trial and to prevent the commission of new offenses (art. 202 para. 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code). Preventive measures are not inherent in any ongoing criminal trial, but are exceptional measures (art. 9 para. 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code), and the court can decide to sease the measure or make use of the measure in the light of the specific circumstances of each case. Of the five preventive measures, three are deprivation of liberty - detention, house arrest and pre-trial detention, and two are non-custodial: judicial control and judicial control on bail. All these measures are only applicable to the natural person. Specific preventive measures may be taken against legal persons, but those are regulated by the provisions of art. 493 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Public Councils as a Legal Form of Partnership between the State and Its Citizens

Today, the existence of every society and every state is marked with the presence of generally accepted phenomena that radically distinguish the legal status of an individual from his ancestors, who lived hundreds or even thousands of years ago. These phenomena are: democracy, legal society, human rights, good governance, participatory democracy, etc. The study of legal relations between an individual or a group of individuals and the state, represented by the system of government in one form or another, has been carried out by a large number of well-known legal scholars, sociologists, political scientists, and economists, all of whom offered numerous theoretical concepts, represented different scientific schools, and worked in various fields of research. The basic issue they have been trying to solve both in the past and at present is how an individual citizen or a group of individuals can influence the decision-making processes of public authorities that affect the interests of each of them. It turned out that the institutions we are aware of (like those of political parties, public organizations, unions) are not the only legal forms of association of the country citizens who seek to exercise public power and represent the interests of certain groups of their compatriots. The active changes that took place in the world after the Second World War, as well as the emergence of the third generation of human rights were a logical continuation of the growing influence of liberal ideas and views, which proved the existence of new scientific alternatives, ideas and concepts for developing the theory of deliberative democracy. The latter’s main objective was the idea of citizens’ active involvement in decision-making by the authorities and local governments, which consequently led to the phenomenon of public-private partnership. The article under discussion contains a legal analysis of the institution of public councils as one of the legal forms of such interaction through the theory of communicative action. At the same time, the paper will contain an attempt to analyze the current Ukrainian legislation that determines and regulates the legal status of public councils. This will enable to draw conclusions about the level of involvement of citizens in the decision-making process. In addition, the article will lay particular emphasis on a study of the already established and existing public councils in Ukraine, as well as will identify the positive and negative aspects of their activities, which will help to work out the problematic aspects of their legal status and offer practical ways to eliminate them.

Post-UN Institutions Specific to the Order of Civilizations

Starting to explore the futurist concept of the “global order of civilizations” and making some notes about the new actors (“the civilizations”) playing as global gladiators and new geopolitical actors on the 21st century stage, we shall point out the institutional framework of such order, that, in our opinion, should include specific bodies and organisms such as: The High Representative of the Global Eco-Regions to the Global Council of Peace; the Global Mediator of Civilizations; the Global Council of Peace; a High Representative for Nature’s Rights; a Global Council of Protection, Preservation and Regeneration of Terrestrial Ecosystems; High Representatives of the rights of planet Earth (within the context of a global law of environment offering specifically to the planet Earth its own rights and a specific juridical global personality, as a higher level of the today Green Deal, as an exit from the traditional patrimonial–absolutist conception about nature as object, as “unlimited patrimony” submitted to all kind of abusive actions and politics of the mankind, governments, or corporations). Global environmental law will become more and more compulsory for transnational actors, in order to ensure the concrete protection of ecosystems, a protection that we are noticing not to be as effective as the state one.

Extinctive Prescription, a Means of Extinguishing the Substantive Right of Action and the Forfeiture of the Right to Invoke it

This article falls both within the provisions of the Civil Code relating to extinctive prescription, its notion and object, the effects of prescription, and, inseparably, within the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure because this institution entails the forfeiture of the right to bring a civil action, which produces serious legal effects for the holder of the right of action because, once invoked and applied, it leads to the loss of the civil subjective right itself. The purpose of the article is to present the general legal rule governing this institution and to highlight the procedural aspects that practitioners must take into account in the activity of legal representation.

Fulfillment of the Conditions of Law no. 302/2004 on the European Arrest Warrant

In the Romanian and European doctrine, taking into account the definition given by the European legislator in the normative act itself, the Framework “Decision no. 2002/584/JHA, the European arrest warrant was defined in a similar manner as the legislator did”. Thus, one jurisprudential decision states that: “from a legal point of view, the European arrest warrant is defined as a court decision issued by the competent judicial authority of an EU Member State, in order for another state to arrest and hand over a person who is wanted in order to stand for prosecution, trial or the execution of a custodial sentence or a security measure” (European Court of Justice, 2016).

Influence and Role of Business Reputation (Goodwill) on the Development of International Business

International business historically and logically arises as a result of the development and deepening of the international division of labor and the formation of the world market. International business is becoming an all-encompassing and pervasive phenomenon of modern civilization. Although there are many examples of international business in which the partners are, on the one hand, a private firm and on the other - a government agency of another country, it is still more typical to consider either inter-firm transactions of this kind, or intra-firm - in the case of if different divisions of the firm are located in different countries and these divisions interact with each other (the most typical in this case - the so-called multinational corporations). International business is based on the ability to benefit from the benefits of interstate (intercountry) business transactions, ie the fact that the sale of this product in another country, or the establishment of a firm of one country of production in another country, or the provision of services jointly by firms etc. provide business parties with more benefits than they would have if they did business in their own countries. This is a key point not only in understanding the nature and specifics of international business itself, but also in explaining the emergence and development of international management as such. Thus, it is a question of motivation of the businessman (manager), and it developed in the context of historical development of a civilization as a whole and its economic kernel - first of all. And definitely the impact of business reputation (goodwill) on the development of such business and its prosperity.

The Preconditions for the Admission of the Preventive Measure Based on an European Arrest Warrant

In addition to the mandatory “grounds for refusing to execute an European arrest warrant, the legislator” also provided for some optional grounds on the basis of which the competent judicial bodies “of the executing Member State may refuse to execute an European arrest warrant”. These provisions give the courts of the executing Member State the right to invoke or not to invoke them and, implicitly, the right to execute or not to execute an European arrest warrant. In our view, the refusal to execute the warrant must be complemented by the establishment “of direct links between the judicial authorities of the two Member States”, with regard to adopting a solution to the situation. In this context, given the complexity of the cases, the specific circumstances of the crimes, as well as other elements, the two judicial authorities involved will have to ascertain the incidence of another European institution, namely the transfer of proceedings in criminal matters.

Gender Equality Principle: Application in ECtHR’s Practice

The article is devoted to analyzing the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which concerned the issue of gender equality, distinctive features of the application of a gender equality principle by the ECtHR. Based on a study of ECtHR's rulings, it is noted that the concept of gender equality as one of the objectives of the Council of Europe has been applied by the ECtHR since the early 1990s. The ECtHR's approaches to dealing with gender equality cases are characterized both through the prism of non-discrimination (applying Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights in combination with other articles) and through complaints about violations of rights guaranteed by other ECHR articles. The analysis shows that, on the one hand, ECtHR emphasizes that gender equality is considered as one of the critical principles of the ECHR. However, on the other hand, significant difficulty in gender discrimination cases is the Court's possibility to refuse to analyze the case in the context of Article 14th content of the Convention. The possibility of giving the Court to states a vast margin of appreciation in determining domestic policies on gender equality is ambiguously manifested in judicial practice. The conclusion states that the need to ensure gender equality can be considered by the ECtHR as a legitimate aim and can serve as an appropriate basis for interfering with the exercise of certain rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention.