scholarly journals Everyday functioning in a community‐based volunteer population: Factors associated with concordance between participant and study partner—Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Merike Verrijp ◽  
Mark A. Dubbelman ◽  
Leonie N.C. Visser ◽  
Roos J. Jutten ◽  
Elke W Nijhuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Functioning ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Study Partner

scholarly journals Everyday functioning in a community-based volunteer population: Differences between participant- and study partner-report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merike Verrijp ◽  
Mark A Dubbelman ◽  
Leonie N.C. Visser ◽  
Roos J Jutten ◽  
Elke W Nijhuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Daily Living ◽  
Brain Research ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Everyday Functioning ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Study Partner ◽  
Impaired Awareness ◽  
Logistic Regressions ◽  
Disease Stages

INTRODUCTION: Impaired awareness in dementia due to Alzheimers disease and related disorders, made study partner-report the preferred method of measuring interference in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). However, with a shifting focus towards earlier disease stages and prevention, the question arises whether self report might be equally or even more appropriate. This study aims to investigate how participant and study partner report IADL perform in a community based volunteer population without dementia, and which factors relate to differences between participant and study partner report. METHODS: Participants (N=3288; 18 to 97 years, 70.4% females) and their study partners (N=1213; 18 to 88 years, 45.8% females) were recruited from the Dutch brain research registry. IADL was measured using the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire. Concordance between participant and study partner-reported IADL difficulties was examined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Multinomial logistic regressions were used to investigate which demographic, cognitive and psychosocial factors related to participant and study partner differences, by looking at the over and underreport of IADL difficulties by the participant, relative to their study partner. RESULTS: The vast majority of Amsterdam IADL scores represented no difficulties for both participants (87.9%) and study partners (89.4%). Concordance between participants and study partners was moderate (ICC=.55, 95%CI=[.51, .59]), 24.5% (N=297) of participants overreported their IADL difficulties compared to study partners, and 17.8% (N=216) underreported difficulties. The presence of depressive symptoms (odds ratio (OR)=1.31, 95%CI=[1.12, 1.54]), as well as memory complaints (OR=2.45, 95%CI=[1.80, 3.34]), increased the odds of participants overreporting their IADL difficulties. Higher IADL ratings decreased the odds of participant underreport (OR=0.71, 95%CI=[0.67, 0.74]). CONCLUSION: In this sample of community based volunteers, the majority of participants and study partners reported no major IADL difficulties. Differences between participant and study partner were, however, quite prevalent, with subjective factors indicative of increased report of IADL difficulties by the participant in particular. These findings suggest that self and study partner report measures may not be interchangeable, and that the level of awareness needs to be taken into account, even in cognitively healthy individuals.

scholarly journals Everyday Functioning in a Community-Based Volunteer Population: Differences Between Participant- and Study Partner-Report

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merike Verrijp ◽  
Mark A. Dubbelman ◽  
Leonie N. C. Visser ◽  
Roos J. Jutten ◽  
Elke W. Nijhuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Daily Living ◽  
Brain Research ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Everyday Functioning ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Study Partner ◽  
Impaired Awareness ◽  
Logistic Regressions ◽  
Disease Stages

Introduction: Impaired awareness in dementia caused by Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders made study partner-report the preferred method of measuring interference in “instrumental activities of daily living” (IADL). However, with a shifting focus toward earlier disease stages and prevention, the question arises whether self-report might be equally or even more appropriate. The aim of this study was to investigate how participant- and study partner-report IADL perform in a community-based volunteer population without dementia and which factors relate to differences between participant- and study partner-report.Methods: Participants (N = 3,288; 18–97 years, 70.4% females) and their study partners (N = 1,213; 18–88 years, 45.8% females) were recruited from the Dutch Brain Research Registry. IADL were measured using the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire. The concordance between participant- and study partner-reported IADL difficulties was examined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Multinomial logistic regressions were used to investigate which demographic, cognitive, and psychosocial factors related to participant and study partner differences, by looking at the over- and underreport of IADL difficulties by the participant, relative to their study partner.Results: Most A-IADL-Q scores represented no difficulties for both participants (87.9%) and study partners (89.4%). The concordance between participants and study partners was moderate (ICC = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.51, 0.59]); 24.5% (N = 297) of participants overreported their IADL difficulties compared with study partners, and 17.8% (N = 216) underreported difficulties. The presence of depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 1.31, 95% CI = [1.12, 1.54]), as well as memory complaints (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = [1.80, 3.34]), increased the odds of participants overreporting their IADL difficulties. Higher IADL ratings decreased the odds of participant underreport (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = [0.67, 0.74]).Conclusion: In this sample of community-based volunteers, most participants and study partners reported no major IADL difficulties. Differences between participant and study partner were, however, quite prevalent, with subjective factors indicative of increased report of IADL difficulties by the participant in particular. These findings suggest that self- and study partner-report measures may not be interchangeable, and that the level of awareness needs to be considered, even in cognitively healthy individuals.

Factors Associated With Evidence-Based Care in Community-Based Child Psychotherapy

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Brookman-Frazee ◽  
Rachel A. Haine ◽  
Mary J. Baker-Ericzen ◽  
Ann F. Garland
Keyword(s):  
Child Psychotherapy ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Evidence Based Care

Factors associated with initiation of community‐based therapy for emerging adults with mood and anxiety disorders

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailey Saunders ◽  
Elizabeth Osuch ◽  
Kelly Anderson ◽  
Janet Martin ◽  
Abraham Kunnilathu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Emerging Adults ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders

scholarly journals Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 300
Author(s):  
Patricia Soares ◽  
João Victor Rocha ◽  
Marta Moniz ◽  
Ana Gama ◽  
Pedro Almeida Laires ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
Multinomial Regression ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Perceived Safety ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
Flu Vaccine ◽  
Release Of Information

It is critical to develop tailored strategies to increase acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine and decrease hesitancy. Hence, this study aims to assess and identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Portugal. We used data from a community-based survey, “COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion”, which includes data regarding intention to take COVID-19 vaccines, health status, and risk perception in Portugal from September 2020 to January 2021. We used multinomial regression to identify factors associated with intention to delay or refuse to take COVID-19 vaccines. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Portugal was high: 56% would wait and 9% refuse. Several factors were associated with both refusal and delay: being younger, loss of income during the pandemic, no intention of taking the flu vaccine, low confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine and the health service response during the pandemic, worse perception of government measures, perception of the information provided as inconsistent and contradictory, and answering the questionnaire before the release of information regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. It is crucial to build confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine as its perceived safety and efficacy were strongly associated with intention to take the vaccine. Governments and health authorities should improve communication and increase trust.

scholarly journals Factors Associated with Patients’ Connection to Referred Social Needs Resources at a Federally Qualified Health Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110243
Author(s):  
Tyler Lian ◽  
Kate Kutzer ◽  
Diwas Gautam ◽  
Howard Eisenson ◽  
Jane C. Crowder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Center ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
Phone Call ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Federally Qualified Health Center ◽  
Or Applications ◽  
Improve Health

Introduction: In an effort to improve health outcomes and promote health equity, healthcare systems have increasingly begun to screen patients for unmet social needs and refer them to relevant social services and community-based organizations. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the successful connection (ie, services started) to social needs resources, as well as factors associated with an attempt to connect as a secondary, intermediate outcome. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who had been screened, referred, and subsequently reached for follow-up navigation from March 2019 to December 2020, as part of a social needs intervention at a federally qualified health center (FQHC). Measures included demographic and social needs covariates collected during screening, as well as resource-related covariates that characterized the referred resources, including service domain (area of need addressed), service site (integration relative to the FQHC), and access modality (means of accessing services). Results: Of the 501 patients in the analytic sample, 32.7% had started services with 1 or more of their referred resources within 4 weeks of the initial referral, and 63.3% had at least attempted to contact 1 referred resource, whether or not they were able to start services. Receiving a referral to resources that patients could access via phone call or drop-in visit, as opposed to resources that required additional appointments or applications prior to accessing services, was associated with increased odds (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.05, 3.61) of connection success, after adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, number of social needs, and resource-related characteristics. This study did not find statistically significant associations between connection attempt and any variable included in adjusted analyses. Conclusion: These findings suggest that referral pathways may influence the success of patients’ connection to social needs resources, highlighting opportunities for more accessible solutions to addressing patients’ unmet social needs.

scholarly journals Factors associated with parental traditional medicine use for children in Fagita Lekoma Woreda Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205031212097800
Author(s):  
Damtew Asrat ◽  
Atsede Alle ◽  
Bekalu Kebede ◽  
Bekalu Dessie
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Traditional Medicine ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Medicine Use ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Traditional Medicines ◽  
Factors Associated

Background: Over the last 100 years, the development and mass production of chemically synthesized drugs have revolutionized health care in most parts of the world. However, large sections of the population in developing countries still depend on traditional medicines for their primary health care needs. More than 88% of Ethiopian parents use different forms of traditional medicine for their children. Therefore, this study aimed to determine factors associated with parental traditional medicine use for children in Fagita Lekoma Woreda. Method: Community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 to 30 March 2019 in Fagita Lekoma Woreda. Data collection tool was a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to present the data. Odds ratio and binary and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to measure the relationship between dependent and independent variables. Results: Among 858 participants, 71% of parents had used traditional medicine for their children within the last 12 months. Parents who cannot read and write (adjusted odds ratio = 6.42, 95% confidence interval = 2.1–19.7), parents with low monthly income (adjusted odds ratio = 4.38, 95% confidence interval = 1.58–12.1), and those who had accesses to traditional medicine (adjusted odds ratio = 2.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.23–3.98) were more likely to use traditional medicine for their children. Urban residents (adjusted odds ratio = 0.20, 95% confidence interval = 0.11–0.38) and members of community-based health insurance (adjusted odds ratio = 0.421, 95% confidence interval = 0.211–0.84) were less likely to use traditional medicine for their children. Conclusions: Our study revealed that the prevalence of traditional medicine remains high. Educational status, monthly income, residence, accessibility to traditional medicine, and being a member of community-based health insurance were predictors of potential traditional medicine use. Therefore, the integration of traditional medicine with modern medicine should be strengthened. Community education and further study on efficacy and safety of traditional medicines should be also given great attention.

scholarly journals The impact of arthritis on the physical function of a rural Maya-Yucateco community and factors associated with its prevalence: a cross sectional, community-based study

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 25-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adalberto Loyola-Sanchez ◽  
Julie Richardson ◽  
Ingris Pelaez-Ballestas ◽  
José Alvarez-Nemegyei ◽  
John N. Lavis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Cataract among elderly in Sri Lanka

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Nilanga Nishad ◽  
S.A. Hewage ◽  
K. Arulmoly ◽  
M.S. Amaratunge ◽  
J de Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Screening Programme ◽  
National Level ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Younger Age

AbstractOut of 39 billion people who are blind around the world, 20 billion (51.3%) is due to cataract, which is preventable. This study intended to assess the prevalence and factors associated with cataract among elderly in a divisional secretariat area in Sri Lanka. This community based cross sectional study assessed randomly selected470 adults over 60 years of age. Diagnosis of cataract was made by a slit lamp examination by medical officers, and classified according to Oxford Lens Opacity Classification system (LOCS III). Majority was between 60-69 age groups and 71% was females. The prevalence of cataract was estimated to be 80.6% including operated eye and 73.6% excluding the operated eye, with a female preponderance in lower age categories. Commonest type of cataract was the nuclear type (n=422; 44.9%), with a majority in grade 2 (218; 23.2%). The prevalence of cataract surgery in the diseased population was as low as 7%. Cataract leading to blindness is very prevalent among adults over 60 years of age in the studied area. Females tend to develop the disease at an early age than males. These findings warrant screening programme for elderly at community level, targeting females at a younger age than males. Future studies are recommended to assess the coverage and barriers for cataract surgeries at national level, which would be immensely useful in planning and improving health services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document