scholarly journals Improving research recruitment through participant input

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie E Large ◽  
Haydee Izurieta Munoz ◽  
Marcela Davila ◽  
James R Hall ◽  
Sid O'Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Lisa Damron ◽  
Irene Litvan ◽  
Ece Bayram ◽  
Sarah Berk ◽  
Bernadette Siddiqi ◽  
...  

Background: Hispanics are under-represented in Parkinson’s disease (PD) research despite the importance of diversity for results to apply to a wide range of patients. Objective: To investigate the perspective of Hispanic persons with Parkinson disease (PWP) regarding awareness, interest, and barriers to participation in research. Methods: We developed and administered a survey and qualitative interview in English and Spanish. For the survey, 62 Hispanic and 38 non-Hispanic PWP linked to a tertiary center were recruited in Arizona. For interviews, 20 Hispanic PWP, 20 caregivers, and six physicians providing service to Hispanic PWP in the community were recruited in California. Survey responses of Hispanic and non-Hispanic PWP were compared. Major survey themes were identified by applying grounded theory and open coding. Results: The survey found roughly half (Q1 54%, Q2 55%) of Hispanic PWP linked to a tertiary center knew about research; there was unawareness among community Hispanic PWP. Most preferred having physician recommendations for research participation and were willing to participate. Hispanics preferred teams who speak their native language and include family. Research engagement, PD knowledge, role of family, living with PD, PD care, pre-diagnosis/diagnosis emerged as themes from the interview. Conclusion: Barriers exist for participation of Hispanic PWP in research, primarily lack of awareness of PD research opportunities. Educating physicians of the need to encourage research participation of Hispanic PWP can address this. Physicians need to be aware of ongoing research and should not assume PWP disinterest. Including family members and providing research opportunities in their native language can increase research recruitment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 599-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita O'Connor ◽  
Leigh Jackson ◽  
Lesley Goldsmith ◽  
Heather Skirton

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Beskow ◽  
Emily E. Namey ◽  
R. Jean Cadigan ◽  
Tracy Brazg ◽  
Julia Crouch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carol Rivas ◽  
Ikuko Tomomatsu ◽  
David Gough

Background: This special issue examines the relationship between disability, evidence, and policy.Key points: Several themes cut across the included papers. Despite the development of models of disability that recognise its socially constructed nature, dis/ableism impedes the involvement of people with disability in evidence production and use. The resultant incomplete representations of disability are biased towards its deproblematisation. Existing data often homogenise the heterogeneous. Functioning and impairment categories are used for surveys, research recruitment and policy enactments, that exclude many. Existing data may crudely evidence some systematic inequalities, but the successful and appropriate development and enactment of disability policies requires more contextual data. Categories and labels drawn from a deficit model affect social constructions of identity, and have been used socially and politically to justify the disenfranchisement of people with disability. Well rehearsed within welfare systems, this results in disempowered and devalued objects of policy, and, as described in one Brazilian paper, the systematic breakup of indigenous families. Several studies show the dangers of policy developed without evidence and impact assessments from and with the intended beneficiaries.Conclusions and implications: There is a need to mitigate barriers to inclusive participation, to enable people with disability to collaborate as equals with other policy actors. The combined application of different policy models and ontologies, currently in tension, might better harness their respective strengths and encourage greater transparency and deliberation regarding the flaws inherent in each. Learning should be shared across minority groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 79-79
Author(s):  
Jenny Jing Xiang ◽  
Alicia Roy ◽  
Christine Summers ◽  
Monica Delvy ◽  
Jessica Lee O'Donovan ◽  
...  

79 Background: Patient-trial matching is a critical step in clinical research recruitment that requires extensive review of clinical data and trial requirements. Prescreening, defined as identifying potentially eligible patients using select eligibility criteria, may streamline the process and increase study enrollment. We describe the real-world experience of implementing a standardized, universal clinical research prescreening protocol within a VA cancer center and its impact on research enrollment. Methods: An IRB approved prescreening protocol was implemented at the VACT Cancer Center in March 2017. All patients with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of cancer are identified through tumor boards, oncology consults, and clinic lists. Research coordinators perform chart review and manually enter patient demographics, cancer type and stage, and treatment history into a REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database. All clinical trials and their eligibility criteria are also entered into REDCap and updated regularly. REDCap generates real time lists of potential research studies for each patient based on his/her recorded data. The primary oncologist is alerted to a patient’s potential eligibility prior to upcoming clinic visits and thus can plan to discuss clinical research enrollment as appropriate. Results: From March 2017 to December 2020, a total of 2548 unique patients were prescreened into REDCAP. The mean age was 71.5 years, 97.5% were male, and 15.5% were African American. 32.57 % patients had genitourinary cancer, 17.15% had lung cancer, and 46.15% were undergoing malignancy workup. 1412 patients were potentially eligible after prescreening and 556 patients were ultimately enrolled in studies. The number of patients enrolled on therapeutic clinical trials increased after the implementation of the prescreening protocol (35 in 2017, 64 in 2018, 78 in 2019, and 55 in 2020 despite the COVID19 pandemic). Biorepository study enrollment increased from 8 in 2019 to 15 in 2020. The prescreening protocol also enabled 200 patients to be enrolled onto a lung nodule liquid biopsy study from 2017 to 2019. Our prescreening process captured 98.57% of lung cancer patients entered into the cancer registry during the same time period. Conclusions: Universal prescreening streamlined research recruitment operations and was associated with yearly increases in clinical research enrollment at a VA cancer center. Our protocol identified most new lung cancer patients, suggesting that, at least for this malignancy, potential study patients were not missed. The protocol was integral in our program becoming the top accruing VA site for NCI’s National Clinical Trial Network (NCTN) studies since 2019.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 1055-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Grill ◽  
Dan Hoang ◽  
Daniel L. Gillen ◽  
Chelsea G. Cox ◽  
Adrijana Gombosev ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mónica Hernández-Johnson ◽  
Rosemary Q. Flores

“Abriendo Caminos/Opening Pathways for Students of Color Into the Teaching Profession: Giving Back to the Community Through Teaching,” funded by an educational improvement grant, was designed to address the teacher shortage and demographic diversity gap between students and teachers in a largely urban public school district in the Southwestern United States. The research team at a large, minority-serving public research institution set to address the teacher shortage and diversity gap in three distinct ways—research, recruitment, and registration/retention—with a strong parental engagement component in every stage. Research shows that the engagement of multicultural families/families of color in schools and surrounding community initiatives may more expediently and reliably translate into improved student educational outcomes than does that involvement focused largely on their children's performance in school. This chapter delineates practical hands-on methods to develop stronger parent partnerships using a social justice lens.


Author(s):  
Luke Gelinas ◽  
Jennifer C. Kesselheim

Social media use has increased exponentially across all demographics. With social media’s widespread popularity comes an increased potential for research sponsors and investigators to use it as an effective tool for recruiting individuals into clinical research. Despite this, there has been relatively little attention paid to the general ethical issues implicated in social media recruitment and even less attention paid to the distinct ethical issues raised by using social media to recruit pediatric populations more specifically. This chapter examines these issues, providing an overview of the use of social media in clinical practice, an assessment of the general ethical issues associated with social media recruitment, and analysis of the potential risks and benefits of using social media to target adolescents for recruitment into clinical research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S706-S706
Author(s):  
Laura Block ◽  
Shannon Mullen ◽  
Gay Thomas ◽  
Betty Kaiser ◽  
Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi

Abstract There is an urgent need to expand enrollment in clinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research. Current recruitment methods for AD research predominantly identify patients from primary/specialty clinic settings, potentially creating barriers for individuals unconnected to care. In response to these challenges, the 2018 National Strategy for Research Recruitment and Participation has called for the development of an applied science of recruitment to inform best strategies. However, progress in this area is hindered by methodological challenges to accurately measure AD patient/caregiver participant views on research participation. The objective of this presentation is to report methodological strategies developed to during a prospective qualitative study to investigate AD patient/caregiver views on acute care research recruitment and participation. Participants included patients with dementia (N=2) who had recently been hospitalized and/or their informal caregivers (N=15). We engaged in iterative development and revision of data collection approaches (i.e. semi-structured questions, audiovisual tools, interview guidance) through collaboration with a Community Advisory Board (CAB). Detailed memos were generated to document interview-related challenges, successes and revisions. Therapeutic misconception in delineating research from clinical care was common during interviews regardless of prior research participation. Interview strategies that focus on lived experiences, remove ambiguity from hypothetical recruitment scenarios, and incorporate supportive visual tools that clarify processes around recruitment improved data collection. Challenges included the lack of a common, shared language around recruitment, which was addressed through CAB guidance and input. In conclusion, thoughtful collaboration with community/lay advisers can successfully inform and data collection methods used in applied recruitment research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document