Individual differences in early body mass affect thermogenic performance and sibling interactions in litter huddles of the house mouse

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (7) ◽  
pp. 825-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Zepeda ◽  
Amando Bautista ◽  
Marylin Rangassamy ◽  
Raquel Monclús ◽  
Celine Bocquet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
House Mouse ◽  
Sibling Interactions

Shaking the myth: Body mass, aggression, steroid hormones, and social dominance in wild house mouse

2015 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 16-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Hiadlovská ◽  
O. Mikula ◽  
M. Macholán ◽  
P. Hamplová ◽  
B. Vošlajerová Bímová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steroid Hormones ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
House Mouse ◽  
Social Dominance ◽  
Wild House Mouse

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE OPTIMAL SPATIAL ORIENTATION ANGLE OF THE VIEWING LAPAROSCOPE DEPENDING ON THE BODY MASS INDEX FOR CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-60
Author(s):  
Мусина Ю.С. ◽  
◽  
Нузова О.Б. ◽  
Каган И.И. ◽  
Файзулина Р.Р. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Spatial Orientation ◽  
Orientation Angle ◽  
The Body

Individual differences in appeal of energy dense foods predicts lower body mass change during adolescence

Appetite ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 184-190
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Sadler ◽  
Eric Stice ◽  
Grace E. Shearrer ◽  
Kyle S. Burger
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Mass Change ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Body Mass Change

Stable trait-like individual differences in salivary uric acid (SUA): Relations to gender and body mass index

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Sabrina Segal ◽  
Olga Kornienko ◽  
Danielle Seay ◽  
Crystal Bryce ◽  
Lauren van Huisstede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Body Mass

scholarly journals Individual Differences in Fornix Microstructure and Body Mass Index

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e59849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Metzler-Baddeley ◽  
Roland J. Baddeley ◽  
Derek K. Jones ◽  
John P. Aggleton ◽  
Michael J. O’Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Body Mass

scholarly journals Does the MTHFR A1298C Polymorphism Modulate the Cardiorespiratory Response to Training?

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Cięszczyk ◽  
Aleksandra Zarębska ◽  
Zbigniew Jastrzębski ◽  
Michał Sawczyn ◽  
Izabela Kozakiewicz-Drobnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Exercise Training ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase ◽  
Anaerobic Power ◽  
Anaerobic Capacity ◽  
Aerobic Exercise Training ◽  
Mass Composition ◽  
Mthfr A1298c ◽  
A1298c Polymorphism

AbstractThe 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR) A1298C polymorphic variant is a candidate to explain the individual differences in trainability and response to exercise training. Therefore, the aim of the study was to verify whether the A1298C polymorphism influenced the aerobic and anaerobic performance as well as body and mass composition in young Polish women following low-high impact aerobic exercise training. Two hundred and one women aged 21 ± 1 years (range 19–24) were included in the study. All of them completed a 12-week exercise training program and were measured for selected somatic features, aerobic capacity and cardiorespiratory fitness indices as well as peak anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity, before and after the intervention. A mixed 2 x 2 ANOVA for 20 dependent variables grouped in three categories was conducted. No significant interaction of the genotype with training for body mass and body composition variables was observed. Although, there were three significant genotype x training interactions for maximal oxygen uptake variables, regardless of body mass i.e.: for VO2max (p < 0.05), HRmax (p < 0.0001) and HRAT/HRmax (p < 0.0001). Significantly greater improvement in VO2max was gained by the CC+AC group compared to the AA genotype group. The present results support the hypothesis that individual differences in trainability are at least in part determined by the genetic component and MTHFR A1298C seems to be one of the many polymorphisms involved.

The challenge of accounting for individual differences in folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Ruisch ◽  
Rajen A. Anderson ◽  
David A. Pizarro
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Individual Variation ◽  
Political Ideologies ◽  
Economic Beliefs ◽  
Existing Data

AbstractWe argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.

Individual differences, social attention, and the history of the social motivation hypotheses of autism

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Mundy
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Early Development ◽  
Emotional Development ◽  
Social Motivation ◽  
Social Attention ◽  
Social Emotional Development ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Precise Understanding ◽  
The Social ◽  
History Of

Abstract The stereotype of people with autism as unresponsive or uninterested in other people was prominent in the 1980s. However, this view of autism has steadily given way to recognition of important individual differences in the social-emotional development of affected people and a more precise understanding of the possible role social motivation has in their early development.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document