Bone marrow donation perceptions among healthcare workers: a survey at University of Toledo Medical Center

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahvish Muzaffar ◽  
Abhimanyu Ghose ◽  
Sapna Shah ◽  
Rekha Chaudhary
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Bone Marrow Donation

Bone marrow donation perceptions among healthcare workers: A follow-up study at University of Cincinnati Medical Center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18032-e18032
Author(s):  
Logan Roof ◽  
Rekha T. Chaudhary
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Donation Process ◽  
Bone Marrow Donation ◽  
Attending Physicians ◽  
Surrounding Bone

e18032 Background: It has been well-documented that there is a severe lack of participants enrolled in the National Bone Marrow Donor registry. Even those who are registered often decline to donate at a critical juncture in the donation process due to a wide variety of misconceptions. Health care professionals should be among the most educated about the bone marrow donation process as they will often be giving advice to potential donors. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey of medical students, residents, fellows, and attending physicians at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center to determine the common misconceptions surrounding bone marrow donation. Results: There were a total of 187 participants (73% medical students, 23% residents/fellows, 4% attending physicians). Fifty-one percent were already bone marrow donors, while 49% were not. Forty percent of respondents believe bone marrow biopsy is necessary for donation and 10% believe CT scans are done prior to donation. Twenty-eight percent responded that bone marrow is extracted under general anesthesia, 43% responded that it is extracted not under general anesthesia, 5% responded that it is extracted via central intravenous line, and 24% responded that it is extracted via peripheral intravenous line. Thirty percent responded that they are not bone marrow donors because bone marrow donation is painful, 12% because it involves surgery, 2% because it weakens the donor, 13% because it involves a lengthy recovery process, 3% because donors have to pay for donation, 1% because of ethnic/religious/cultural beliefs, while 39% have not had the opportunity to donate but would or are planning on it. Conclusions: The majority of allogeneic transplants are performed with peripherally collected bone marrow stem cells, however, most potential donors including health care professionals do not know this. We conclude that a great deal of education surrounding bone marrow donation is still needed among healthcare workers today. Educating health care workers is of the utmost importance as they will impart this knowledge to those considering donation. Future aims of this project are to develop an educational curriculum to address the most common misconceptions, particularly in medical students, as they are in the age group most targeted in bone marrow donation and they will be the future generation of physicians to educate patients on the process.

scholarly journals Hand Hygiene Compliance Study at a Large Central Hospital in Vietnam

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cam Le ◽  
Erik Lehman ◽  
Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Timothy Craig
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
World Health ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Cultural Attitudes ◽  
Knowledge And Attitude ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Lack of proper hand hygiene among healthcare workers has been identified as a core facilitator of hospital-acquired infections. Although the concept of hand hygiene quality assurance was introduced to Vietnam relatively recently, it has now become a national focus in an effort to improve the quality of care. Nonetheless, barriers such as resources, lack of education, and cultural norms may be limiting factors for this concept to be properly practiced. Our study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude of healthcare workers toward hand hygiene and to identify barriers to compliance, as per the World Health Organization’s guidelines, through surveys at a large medical center in Vietnam. In addition, we aimed to evaluate the compliance rate across different hospital departments and the roles of healthcare workers through direct observation. Results showed that, in general, healthcare workers had good knowledge of hand hygiene guidelines, but not all believed in receiving reminders from patients. The barriers to compliance were identified as: limited resources, patient overcrowding, shortage of staff, allergic reactions to hand sanitizers, and lack of awareness. The overall compliance was 31%; physicians had the lowest rate of compliance at 15%, while nurses had the highest rate at 39%; internal medicine had the lowest rate at 16%, while the intensive care unit had the highest rate at 40%. In summary, it appears that addressing cultural attitudes in addition to enforcing repetitive quality assurance and assessment programs are needed to ensure adherence to safe hand washing.

scholarly journals The Sheba Medical Center healthcare workers' children's school: can we open schools safely?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Or Kriger ◽  
Yaniv Lustig ◽  
Carmit Cohen ◽  
Sharon Amit ◽  
Asaf Biber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center

scholarly journals Needle Stick and Sharp Injuries Among Healthcare Workers: A retrospective six-year study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Rami Saadeh ◽  
Khaled Khairallah ◽  
Hussein Abozeid ◽  
Lama Al Rashdan ◽  
Mahmoud Alfaqih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
National Level ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Medicine Department ◽  
Needle Stick ◽  
Job Title ◽  
Hospital Wards ◽  
And Training

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the proportion of needle stick and sharp injuries (NSSIs) among healthcare workers at King Hussein Medical Center (KHMC), Amman, Jordan. Methods: All NSSI reports referred from departments at KHMC to the Preventive Medicine Department between 2013–2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Proportion of NSSIs were calculated and stratified according to age, gender, job title, place and site of injury and the procedure/task during which the injury occurred. Results: There were a total of 393 NSSIs. A significant association was found between the proportion of NSSIs and all tested variables (P <0.001). The reported proportion of NSSIs was highest among nurses (39.7%) followed by cleaners (36.3%), physicians (10.4%), other workers (7.4%) and lab technicians (5.9%) during the study’s six-year period. Hospital wards were the most common locations (46.1%) where injuries took place. Injuries also occurred most frequently during medical waste collection (38.2%). Conclusion: The proportion of NSSIs was highest among nurses and cleaners. Safety policies and training among high-risk groups should be reviewed to reduce the risk of NSSIs. Multicentre studies at a national level should be conducted to examine whether this study’s findings reflect national trends.Keywords: Needlestick Injuries; Safety; Self Report; Nurses; Accident Prevention; Jordan.

scholarly journals 421. Effect of SARs-Cov-2 mRNA Vaccination in Healthcare Workers with Household COVID Exposure

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S311-S311
Author(s):  
Laura Selby ◽  
Richard Starlin
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Viral Shedding ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Significant Burden

Abstract Background Healthcare workers have experienced a significant burden of COVID-19 disease. COVID mRNA vaccines have shown great efficacy in prevention of severe disease and hospitalization due to COVID infection, but limited data is available about acquisition of infection and asymptomatic viral shedding. Methods Fully vaccinated healthcare workers at a tertiary-care academic medical center in Omaha Nebraska who reported a household exposure to COVID-19 infection are eligible for a screening program in which they are serially screened with PCR but allowed to work if negative on initial test and asymptomatic. Serial screening by NP swab was completed every 5-7 days, and workers became excluded from work if testing was positive or became symptomatic. Results Of the 94 employees who were fully vaccinated at the time of the household exposure to COVID-19 infection, 78 completed serial testing and were negative. Sixteen were positive on initial or subsequent screening. Vaccine failure rate of 17.0% (16/94). Healthcare workers exposed to household COVID positive contact Conclusion High risk household exposures to COVID-19 infection remains a significant potential source of infections in healthcare workers even after workers are fully vaccinated with COVID mRNA vaccines especially those with contact to positive domestic partners. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals COVID-19 vaccine impact on rates of SARS-CoV-2 cases and post vaccination strain sequences among healthcare workers at an urban academic medical center: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara C. Bouton ◽  
Sara Lodi ◽  
Jacquelyn Turcinovic ◽  
Sarah E. Weber ◽  
Emily Quinn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Post Vaccination ◽  
Unvaccinated Control ◽  
Rate Ratios

AbstractBackgroundCOVID-19 vaccine trials and post-implementation data suggest vaccination decreases SARS-CoV-2 infections. We examine COVID-19 vaccination’s impact on SARS-CoV-2 case rates and viral diversity among healthcare workers (HCW) during a high community prevalence period.MethodsA prospective cohort study from Boston Medical Center (BMC)’s HCW vaccination program, where staff received two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. We included PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases among HCWs from December 09, 2020 to February 23, 2021. Weekly SARS-CoV-2 rates per 100,000 person-day overall and by time from first injection (1-14 and >14 days) were compared with surrounding community rates. Viral genomes were sequenced from SARS CoV-2 positive samples.ResultsSARS-CoV-2 cases occurred in 1.4% (96/7109) of HCWs given at least a first dose and 0.3% (17/5913) of HCWs given both vaccine doses. Adjusted SARS-CoV-2 infection rate ratios were 0.73 (95% CI 0.53-1.00) 1-14 days and 0.18 (0.10-0.32) >14 days from first dose. HCW SARS-CoV-2 cases >14 days from initial dose compared to within 14 days were more often older (46 versus 38 years, p=0.007), Latinx (10% versus 8%, p=0.03), and asymptomatic (48% versus 11%, p=0.0002). SARS-CoV-2 rates among HCWs fell below those of the surrounding community, with a 18% versus 11% weekly decrease respectively (p=0.14). Comparison of 48 SARS-CoV-2 genomes sequenced from post-first dose cases did not indicate selection pressure towards known spike-antibody escape mutations.ConclusionsOur results indicate a positive impact of COVID-19 vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 case rates. Post-vaccination isolates did not show unusual genetic diversity or selection for mutations of concern.Main PointCases of SARS-CoV-2 among health care workers dropped rapidly with COVID-19 vaccination. Sequencing 48 breakthrough infections (overwhelmingly in 14 days after 1st dose) showed no clear sign of any differences in spike protein compared with time-matched, unvaccinated control sequences.

scholarly journals In depth characterization of vaccine breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers of a Dutch academic medical center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidewij W Rümke ◽  
Femke C Groenveld ◽  
Yvonne M G van Os ◽  
Patrique Praest ◽  
Anniek A N Tanja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Responses ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Risk Exposure ◽  
Live Virus ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
T Cell Immune Responses

Abstract SARS-CoV-2 infection after COVID-19 vaccination raises concerns about the emergence of vaccine escape variants. Here we characterize 14 breakthrough infections among 5860 fully vaccinated Dutch healthcare workers ≥14 days post final dose of vaccination with either BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 or Ad26.COV2.S. These breakthrough infections presented with regular B.1.1.7 (Alpha) and B.1.617.2 (Delta) variants and high viral loads, despite normal vaccine induced B- and T-cell immune responses detected by live virus neutralization assays and ELISpot. High-risk exposure settings, such as in households, indicate a potential risk of viral transmission despite full vaccination.

Proposed Antiretroviral Therapy Guidelines for Prophylaxis of Occupationally Related HIV Seroconversion A Practical Approach

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 672-674
Author(s):  
Aaron E. Glatt
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Therapy Guidelines ◽  
Antiretroviral Prophylaxis ◽  
New Information ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv Seroconversion

AbstractRecent research indicates that antiretroviral prophylaxis significantly reduces occupationally related human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroconversion. This article outlines principles on which guidelines were based for treating aggressively those healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to HIV occupationally at the Catholic Medical Center in Jamaica, New York. These recommendations attempt to provide HCWs with the best possible available antiretroviral therapy to treat occupational HIV seroconversion. New options must continue to be explored as new information becomes available.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document