Social inequalities in treatment receipt for childhood cancers in Ireland: a population‐based analysis

Author(s):  
Michal Molcho ◽  
Audrey A Thomas ◽  
Paul M Walsh ◽  
Roderick Skinner ◽  
Linda Sharp

Author(s):  
ETC Lai ◽  
R Griffiths ◽  
A Akbari ◽  
SK Urhoj ◽  
AMN Andersen ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (10) ◽  
pp. 2409-2415 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Yvonne Joko‐Fru ◽  
D. Maxwell Parkin ◽  
Margaret Borok ◽  
Eric Chokunonga ◽  
Anne Korir ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline S. Duchaine ◽  
Ruth Ndjaboué ◽  
Manon Levesque ◽  
Michel Vézina ◽  
Xavier Trudel ◽  
...  


2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. s198-s208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros ◽  
Priscila Maria Stolses Bergamo Francisco ◽  
Margareth Guimarães Lima ◽  
Chester Luiz Galvão César

The aim of the present study was to assess social inequalities in health status, health behavior and the use of health services based on education level. A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out involving 1,518 elderly residents of Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil. Significant demographic and social differences were found between schooling strata. Elderly individuals with a higher degree of schooling are in greater proportion alcohol drinkers, physically active, have healthier diets and a lower prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dizziness, headaches, back pain, visual impairment and denture use, and better self-rated health. But, there were no differences in the use of health services in the previous two weeks, in hospitalizations or surgeries in the previous year, nor in medicine intake over the previous three days. Among elderly people with hypertension and diabetes, there were no differences in the regular use of health services and medication. The results demonstrate social inequalities in different health indicators, along with equity in access to some health service components.



Neoplasma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (04) ◽  
pp. 620-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. KODYTKOVA ◽  
V. BAJCIOVA ◽  
D. KREJCI ◽  
M. ZAPLETALOVA ◽  
V. DUSEK ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethel Leonor Noia Maciel ◽  
Pablo Medeiros Jabor ◽  
Laylla Ribeiro Macedo ◽  
Gilton Luiz Almada ◽  
Raphael Lubiana Zanotti ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT: Objectives: to estimate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of the Greater Vitória region living in subnormal and non-subnormal agglomerates, and to compare sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of total residents (infected and not infected with SARS-CoV-2) between them. Methods: Population-based prevalence study conducted by serological testing in 2020, with a study unit in households in Greater Vitória, grouped into census tracts classified as sub-normal agglomerates and non-sub-normal agglomerates. The two groups were compared in terms of prevalence and associated factors. The significance level adopted was 5%. Results: The prevalence found in the sub-normal clusters was 12.05% (95%CI 9.59–14.50), and in the non-sub-normal clusters 10.23% (95%CI 7.97–12.50) this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.273). Comparing the sociodemographic characteristics, more people who declare themselves to be of mixed race were found in the sub-normal clusters, a higher percentage of illiterates and people with only elementary education, greater number of residents per household, longer stay in public transportation, sharing a bathroom with another household, fewer bedrooms per residence and higher frequency of irregular water supply when compared to non-sub-normal clusters (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The epidemiological characteristics of sub-normal clusters’ residents show the social inequalities that can hinder control measures in a pandemic situation.



2021 ◽  
pp. cebp.0053.2021
Author(s):  
Tim Allen Bruckner ◽  
Ralph Catalano ◽  
Abhery Das ◽  
Yunxia Lu


PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262192
Author(s):  
Nathalie Bajos ◽  
Alexis Spire ◽  
Léna Silberzan ◽  

Equal Access to the COVID-19 vaccine for all remains a major public health issue. The current study compared the prevalence of vaccination reluctance in general and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and social and health factors associated with intentions to receive the vaccine. A random socio-epidemiological population-based survey was conducted in France in November 2020, in which 85,855 adults participants were included in this study. We used logistic regressions to study being "not at all in favor" to vaccination in general, and being "certainly not" willing to get vaccinated against Covid-19. Our analysis highlighted a gendered reluctance toward vaccination in general but even more so regarding vaccination against COVID-19 (OR = 1.88 (95% CI: 1.79–1.97)). We also found that people at the bottom of the social hierarchy, in terms of level of education, financial resources, were more likely to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine (from OR = 1.22 (95% CI:1.10–1.35) for respondents without diploma to OR = 0.52 (95% CI:0.47–0.57) for High school +5 or more years level). People from the French overseas departments, immigrants and descendants of immigrants, were all more reluctant to the Covid-19 vaccine (first-generation Africa/Asia immigrants OR = 1.16 (95% CI:1.04–1.30)) versus OR = 2.19 (95% CI:1.96–2.43) for the majority population). Finally, our analysis showed that those who reported not trusting the government were more likely to be Covid-19 vaccine-reluctant (OR = 3.29 (95% CI: 3.13–3.45)). Specific campaigns should be thought beforehand to reach women and people at the bottom of the social hierarchy to avoid furthering social inequalities in terms of morbidity and mortality.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document