A Flow Cytometry-Based Protocol to Measure Lymphocyte Viability Upon Metabolic Stress

Author(s):  
Sébastien Denanglaire ◽  
Tiphène Pirnay ◽  
Oberdan Leo ◽  
Fabienne Andris
Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2265-2265
Author(s):  
Alireza Paikari ◽  
Ankush Goyal ◽  
Christelle Cousin ◽  
Vincent Petit ◽  
Vivien A. Sheehan

Background: Glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) is a ubiquitously expressed protein highly expressed on the surface of erythrocytes. As a member of insulin signaling pathway, GLUT1 is responsible for basal and growth factor-stimulated glucose uptake. The insulin signaling pathway is involved in several different biologic functions including cellular metabolism, energy regulation, cell cycle control, and stress response. We have previously identified several components of the insulin signaling pathway, including FOXO3, AMPK, and IGFBP3, to be associated with fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels in erythroid progenitor cells from sickle cell disease (SCD) patients. We have shown that metformin, a FOXO3 and AMPK activator, induces HbF in vitro. Furthermore, our preliminary data of metformin clinical trial in patients with SCD suggests that metformin can induce HbF in vivo. Studies in non-erythroid cells have reported that metformin increases production and surface expression of GLUT1; increase in the activated form of both AMPK and FOXO3 is also associated with elevated GLUT1 surface expression and its activation. Given these interesting associations, we hypothesized that GLUT1 levels may be associated with HbF levels in patients with SCD. To test this, we measured the expression levels of GLUT1 on the surface of red blood cells (RBC) from patients with SCD and investigated its correlation with hematologic indices. Methods: Applying a receptor binding domain labeling technique using anti GLUT1 antibody (Metafora Biosystems), we quantified GLUT1 expression measuring its geometric mean fluorescence intensity index on the surface of the RBCs by flow cytometry (Attune NxT). GLUT1 and CD71+ expression was measured on peripheral blood samples collected from 13 pediatric patients with HbSS (all on hydroxyurea, none on transfusion therapy) under an IRB approved protocol from Baylor College of Medicine. Patients ranged from 4 to 21 years of age; 52% were male. 4 HbAA normal donors were also analyzed, ages 28 to 43 years old, 50% male. HbF levels were obtained on the same date of collection by HPLC (Agilent, 1260 infinity-2). Complete blood count with differential and absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) was measured by ADVIA-120 hematology analyzer (Siemens). Flow cytometry data was analyzed by FlowJo software. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test. Results and conclusions: We identified a strong positive correlation between GLUT1 expression and HbF on the surface of hydroxyurea treated HbSS RBCs, R2=0.41. Possible variables contributing to this correlation are HU treatment differences, patient age, and RBC stage of maturation. However, 1) there was no correlation between GLUT1 levels and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), suggesting that variations in HU usage did not contribute to the association; 2) there was no association between patient age and GLUT1 levels; 3) there was also no correlation between GLUT1 levels and ARC or %CD71 positivity, suggesting that the GLUT1:HbF correlation was not due to more early stage erythroid cells with higher HbF levels due to a maturation arrest (Figure 1). GLUT1 expression was significantly higher on the surface of HbSS RBCs and CD71+ cells compared to HbAA (Figure 2); this is possibly due to the increased metabolic demand for glucose in the sickle RBC, but may also impact the basal HbF level of the sickle RBC. We hypothesize that cells with higher HbF levels have higher levels of activated AMPK, which activates FOXO3, a positive regulator of HbF (Zhang et al., Blood 2018), consistent with a metabolic stress state. Metabolic stress leads to an increase in GLUT1, to facilitate glucose transport. Future work will explore potential causative relationships between GLUT1 levels and HbF, and determine whether pharmacologic manipulation of GLUT1 may increase HbF in patients with SCD. Disclosures Petit: Metafora-biosystems: Equity Ownership, Other: CEO and co-founder.


2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bellido ◽  
E. Rubiol ◽  
J. Ubeda ◽  
O. Lopez ◽  
C. Estivill ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (04) ◽  
pp. 432-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
A W J Stuttle ◽  
M J Powling ◽  
J M Ritter ◽  
R M Hardisty

SummaryThe anti-platelet monoclonal antibody P256 is currently undergoing development for in vivo detection of thrombus. We have examined the actions of P256 and two fragments on human platelet function. P256, and its divalent fragment, caused aggregation at concentrations of 10−9−3 × 10−8 M. A monovalent fragment of P256 did not cause aggregation at concentrations up to 10−7 M. P256–induced platelet aggregation was dependent upon extracellular calcium ions as assessed by quin2 fluorescence. Indomethacin partially inhibited platelet aggregation and completely inhibited intracellular calcium mobilisation. Apyrase caused partial inhibition of aggregation. Aggregation induced by the divalent fragment was dependent upon fibrinogen and was inhibited by prostacyclin. Aggregation induced by the whole antibody was only partially dependent upon fibrinogen, but was also inhibited by prostacyclin. P256 whole antibody was shown, by flow cytometry, to induce fibrinogen binding to indomethacin treated platelets. Monovalent P256 was shown to be a specific antagonist for aggregation induced by the divalent forms. In–111–labelled monovalent fragment bound to gel-filtered platelets in a saturable and displaceable manner. Monovalent P256 represents a safer form for in vivo applications


1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (05) ◽  
pp. 745-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elza Chignier ◽  
Maud Parise ◽  
Lilian McGregor ◽  
Caroline Delabre ◽  
Sylvie Faucompret ◽  
...  

SummaryP-selectin, also known as CD62P, GMP140 or PADGEM, is present in platelet a-granules and endothelial cell Weibel-Palade bodies and is very rapidly expressed on the surface of these cells on activation. In this study, an anti P-selectin monoclonal antibody (LYP20) was used, in tandem with flow cytometry, to identify activated platelets at the site of induced vascular trauma or in peripheral blood. Moreover, electron microscopy was performed to characterize sites of vascular trauma and quantify the number of adhering platelets. The same induced vascular trauma was observed to result into animals responding in 2 different ways (Group I, Group II) following the degree of platelet activation. Five rats, out of 14 with induced vascular trauma, had more than half of their circulating platelets expressing P-selectin when drawn at the site of the trauma (67.4% ± 3.44) or in peripheral blood (78.5% ± 2.5) (Group I). In the remaining 9 animals a much smaller proportion of circulating platelets expressed P-selectin when assayed from trauma sites (18% ± 3.34) or in peripheral blood (18.0% ± 4.30) (Group II). Enhanced P-selectin expression by circulating platelets in Group I, compared to Group II, appears to be linked to the degree of activated platelets adhering at sites of trauma (171 ± 15 × 103 platelets versus 48 ± 31 × 103 platelets per mm2). In the 5 control animals, that were not operated on, platelets expressing P-selectin when drawn at the site of a mock trauma (7.0% ± 1.84) or in the peripheral blood (11.2% ± 3.30) showed little activation. In addition, no platelet adhesion was seen on the vascular bed of these animals. Results from this study show that analysis of P-selectin (CD62P) expression, in circulating platelets, is a valuable and rapid marker of platelet activation following severe vascular trauma induced in rats. However, activated platelets were not detected to the same extent in the peripheral blood of all animals having undergone vascular trauma. It is conceivable that platelets, depending on the degree of activation, may be actively sequestered in organs and prevented from circulating. Alternatively, P-selectin may be rapidly endocytosed, or not expressed, by activated circulating platelets depending on the type of agonists implicated in vivo activation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document