Expression and Targeting of Tumor Markers in Gelfoam® Histoculture: Potential Individualized Assays for Immuno-Oncology

2018 ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
Robert M. Hoffman ◽  
Fiorella Guadagni
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Markers

Use of Tumor Markers in Lung Cancer

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary M. Strauss ◽  
Arthur T. Skarin
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Tumor Markers

Abstract #832 Tumor Markers in Functional and Silent Corticotroph Adenomas

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 189-190
Author(s):  
Adriana Gonzalez ◽  
Daniel Brat ◽  
Emir Veledar ◽  
Nelson Oyesiku ◽  
Daniel Barrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Corticotroph Adenomas

Circulating matrix metaloproteinases as biomarkers in colorectalcancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (9) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Tissue Inhibitors ◽  
Natural Tissue

The aim of this research is to offer comprehensive point of view related to perspective tumor markers called matrix metaloproteinases and their natural tissue inhibitors. Those markers are potentially useable mainly in postoperative follow-up in patients with colorectal cancer.

Serum Tumor Markers in Stage I-II Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Tozzoli ◽  
Federica D';Aurizio ◽  
Flavio Falcomer ◽  
Stefano M.M. Basso ◽  
Franco Lumachi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Serum Tumor Markers

scholarly journals Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amal Ramadan ◽  
Maha Hashim ◽  
Amr Abouzid ◽  
Menha Swellam
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Duct Carcinoma ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Aberrant DNA methylation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene has been found in many cancers. The object of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of PTEN methylation as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The study includes 153 newly diagnosed females, and they were divided according to their clinical diagnosis into breast cancer patients (n = 112) and females with benign breast lesion (n = 41). A group of healthy individuals (n = 25) were recruited as control individuals. Breast cancer patients were categorized into early stage (0–I, n = 48) and late stage (II–III, n = 64), and graded into low grade (I–II, n = 42) and high grade (III, n = 70). Their pathological types were invasive duct carcinoma (IDC) (n = 66) and duct carcinoma in situ (DCI) (n = 46). Tumor markers (CEA and CA15.3) were detected using ELISA. DNA was taken away from the blood, and the PTEN promoter methylation level was evaluated using the EpiTect Methyl II PCR method. Results The findings revealed the superiority of PTEN methylation status as a good discriminator of the cancer group from the other two groups (benign and control) with its highest AUC and increased sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (100%) over tumor markers (50% and 84% for CEA and 49.1% and 86.4% for CA15.3), respectively. The frequency of PTEN methylation was 96.4% of breast cancer patients and none of the benign and controls showed PTEN methylation and the means of PTEN methylation (87 ± 0.6) were significantly increased in blood samples of breast cancer group as compared to both benign and control groups (25 ± 0.7 and 12.6 ± 0.3), respectively. Methylation levels of PTEN were higher in the blood of patients with ER-positive than in patients with ER-negative cancers (P = 0.007) and in HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative tumors (P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis recognizes PTEN methylation status as a significant forecaster of bad progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after 40 months follow-up. Conclusions PETN methylation could be supposed as one of the epigenetic aspects influencing the breast cancer prognosis that might foretell more aggressive actions and worse results in breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Evaluation of potential tumor markers that may predict neoadjuvant treatment efficiency in rectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Demet Arslan ◽  
Ayse Kocak ◽  
Cengiz Aydın ◽  
Emel Ebru Pala ◽  
Dilek Oncel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Beclin 1 ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Study Gene Expression ◽  
Regression Grade

AbstractObjectivesThe recurrence of rectal cancer or its resistance to neoadjuvant treatment develops due to the adaptation to hypoxia, apoptosis or autophagy. Survivin, one of the inhibitors of apoptosis; Beclin 1, which is a positive regulator in the autophagy pathway; and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA9), which are associated with tumor tissue hypoxia, may be related to resistance to treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the potential tumor markers that may help to monitor the response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (RC).MethodsTwenty-five patients with locally advanced RC were included in the study. Gene expression and protein levels of Beclin 1, Survivin, HIF-1α, and CA9 were analyzed in fresh tissue specimens and blood samples. The relationships of these markers to tumor staging and regression grade were evaluated.ResultsHigher blood CA9 gene expression levels and lower blood HIF-1α protein levels were found in the response group according to tumor regression grade. After neoadjuvant treatment, tissue Beclin 1 and blood Survivin gene expressions and tissue CA9, blood Beclin 1 and blood HIF-1α protein levels decreased significantly.ConclusionBeclin 1, Survivin, HIF-1α ve CA9 may help to predict the effects of the applied treatment approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document