scholarly journals Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amal Ramadan ◽  
Maha Hashim ◽  
Amr Abouzid ◽  
Menha Swellam
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Duct Carcinoma ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Aberrant DNA methylation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene has been found in many cancers. The object of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of PTEN methylation as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The study includes 153 newly diagnosed females, and they were divided according to their clinical diagnosis into breast cancer patients (n = 112) and females with benign breast lesion (n = 41). A group of healthy individuals (n = 25) were recruited as control individuals. Breast cancer patients were categorized into early stage (0–I, n = 48) and late stage (II–III, n = 64), and graded into low grade (I–II, n = 42) and high grade (III, n = 70). Their pathological types were invasive duct carcinoma (IDC) (n = 66) and duct carcinoma in situ (DCI) (n = 46). Tumor markers (CEA and CA15.3) were detected using ELISA. DNA was taken away from the blood, and the PTEN promoter methylation level was evaluated using the EpiTect Methyl II PCR method. Results The findings revealed the superiority of PTEN methylation status as a good discriminator of the cancer group from the other two groups (benign and control) with its highest AUC and increased sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (100%) over tumor markers (50% and 84% for CEA and 49.1% and 86.4% for CA15.3), respectively. The frequency of PTEN methylation was 96.4% of breast cancer patients and none of the benign and controls showed PTEN methylation and the means of PTEN methylation (87 ± 0.6) were significantly increased in blood samples of breast cancer group as compared to both benign and control groups (25 ± 0.7 and 12.6 ± 0.3), respectively. Methylation levels of PTEN were higher in the blood of patients with ER-positive than in patients with ER-negative cancers (P = 0.007) and in HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative tumors (P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis recognizes PTEN methylation status as a significant forecaster of bad progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after 40 months follow-up. Conclusions PETN methylation could be supposed as one of the epigenetic aspects influencing the breast cancer prognosis that might foretell more aggressive actions and worse results in breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Early detection of Breast Cancer by Tumor Marker CA15.3, CA27.29 and relationship with P53 and Vitamin D

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
Ryaidh Sh. Al-Hussain ◽  
Eman M. Kathaem ◽  
Luay N. Baker ◽  
Saeed H. Assi ◽  
Saad S. Abdulbaqi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Tumor Marker ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
The Body ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Breast Cancer Group ◽  
And Control

Breast cancer is the second most frequent cancer of women. Tumor markers are substances that can be found in the body when cancer is present. The classic tumor marker is a protein that can be found in the blood in increased levels when the cancer is present.The present study have been investigated the levels of cancer antigen CA15.3, CA27.29, P53 and Vitamin D in women with breast cancer, aged were 30-75 years old, they divided into four groups, each group composed of 50 women included breast cancer patients aged 30-59 year, breast cancer patients aged 60-75 years, milking nodules groups 30-60 year and control groups. This study showed significant P<0.05 increasing in the level of CA15.3, CA27.29 and P53 concentration in milking nodules and both breast cancer groups, also showed significant P<0.05 decreasing in vitamin D concentration in milking group and breast cancer group and significant difference in serum Ca concentration.

Clinical impact of LncRNA XIST and LncRNA NEAT1 for diagnosis of high-risk group breast cancer patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 100709
Author(s):  
Menha Swellam ◽  
Hekmat M EL Magdoub ◽  
May A Shawki ◽  
Marwa Adel ◽  
Mona M Hefny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Lncrna Xist ◽  
Lncrna Neat1

scholarly journals Differential Expression of Serum Exosomal miRNAs in Breast Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahim Asgari ◽  
Jafar Rezaie
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Circulatory System ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Flow Cytometry Analysis ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Exosomal Mirnas ◽  
And Control

Purpose: Breast cancer has become as a serious public health concern worldwide. Breast cancer cells release exosomes into the circulatory system, which are easily accessible for further analysis like cancer diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to investigate expression of circulating exosomal miRNAs (miRs) in the serum of individuals with breast cancer and healthy controls. Methods: Exosomes were collected from serum samples using a commercial kit and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and flow cytometry analysis. Expression of miRs such as miR-21, miR-155, miR-182, miR-373, and miR-126 were evaluated by real-time PCR. Results: The result showed that the expression level of exosomal miR-21, miR-155, miR-182, and miR-373 in the serum of breast cancer patients was higher than of those controls (P<0.05). However, expression of miR-126 did not change between breast cancer and control individuals (P>0.05). Conclusion: Our results showed a different miRs expression pattern between breast cancer and healthy samples, supposing potential biomarkers for breast cancer. Further studies focusing on these miRs are required to confirm our findings.

scholarly journals Promoter Methylation Status of the Retinoic Acid Receptor-Beta 2 Gene in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case Control Study and Systematic Review

Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kheirollah Yari ◽  
Zohreh Rahimi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Retinoic Acid Receptor ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Normal Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Retinoic Acid Receptor Beta ◽  
Cancer Tissues ◽  
Breast Tissues ◽  
Receptor Beta

Background: We aimed to determine the promoter methylation status of the retinoic acid receptor-beta 2 (RARβ2) gene among breast cancer patients and to review relevant studies in this field in various populations. Methods: We analyzed 400 samples which comprised blood specimens from 102 breast cancer patients, 102 first-degree female relatives of patients, 100 cancer-free females, 48 breast cancer tissues, and 48 adjacent normal breast tissues from the same patients. The RARβ2 methylation status was determined using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and DNA sequencing methods. Results: The presence of combined partially methylated (MU) and fully methylated (MM) forms of the RARβ2 gene (MU+MM) in the blood of patients was associated with susceptibility to breast cancer (odds ratio = 4.7, p = 0.05). A significantly higher frequency of the MM genotype was observed in cancer tissue (10.4%) compared to matched adjacent normal breast tissue (0%) (p = 0.02). Conclusion: We found a higher frequency of RARβ2 gene methylation in the blood and cancer tissues of patients compared to the blood of controls and adjacent normal breast tissues. The survey of studies on various populations demonstrated a higher RARβ2 methylation frequency in breast cancer patients compared to normal individuals, and many reports suggest a significant association between hypermethylation of the gene and susceptibility to breast cancer.

CA 549 and SP2 in postoperative breast cancer patients. Comparison with CA 15.3, CEA and TPA

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Torres ◽  
C. Pacheco ◽  
A. Valverde ◽  
A.C. Rebollo ◽  
A. Moral ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Benign Diseases ◽  
Ca 15.3 ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Breast Cancer Group

The levels of CA 549 and SP2 were measured in 430 subjects: 100 healthy blood donors, 130 patients with benign diseases and 200 postoperative breast cancer patients. In the latter group, the serum levels of CA 15.3, CEA and TPA were also measured. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann Whitney and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. The upper normal limits were established on the basis of the values obtained in the healthy blood donors group, the benign diseases group and R.O.C. analysis of the breast cancer group. They were: CA 549 = 13 U/ml, SP2 = 14 U/ml, CA 15.3 = 35 U/ml, CEA = 5 ng/ml and TPA = 110 U/ml. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the breast cancer group were, respectively: CA 549 = 78.1%, 97.1% and 88%; SP2 = 21.9%, 90.4% and 57.5%; CEA = 66.7%, 95.2% and 81.5%; CA 15.3 = 80.2%, 98.1% and 89.5%, and TPA = 73.9%, 78.8% and 76.5%. Statistical analysis showed significant differences only between CA 15.3, the marker which gave the best results, and SP2 (p<0.001). There were no significant differences with the association of two or three tumor markers.

Methylation status and protein expression of RASSF1A in breast cancer patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoda A. Hagrass ◽  
Heba F. Pasha ◽  
Mohamed A. Shaheen ◽  
Eman H. Abdel Bary ◽  
Rasha Kassem
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document