Patient Specific Implants from a 3D Printer – An Innovative Manufacturing Process for Custom PEEK Implants in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

2017 ◽  
pp. 308-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian M. Thieringer ◽  
Neha Sharma ◽  
Azagen Mootien ◽  
Ralf Schumacher ◽  
Philipp Honigmann
Keyword(s):  
Manufacturing Process ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
3D Printer ◽  
Patient Specific Implants

The Use of Patient-Specific Implants in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Huang ◽  
David Alfi ◽  
Jonathan Alfi ◽  
Andrew T. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Patient Specific Implants

scholarly journals Imaging, Virtual Planning, Design, and Production of Patient-Specific Implants and Clinical Validation in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Dérand ◽  
Lars-Erik Rännar ◽  
Jan-M Hirsch
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Bone Substitutes ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Virtual Design ◽  
Patient Specific Implants ◽  
Cutting Guide ◽  
Ablative Surgery ◽  
Cutting Guides

The purpose of this article was to describe the workflow from imaging, via virtual design, to manufacturing of patient-specific titanium reconstruction plates, cutting guide and mesh, and its utility in connection with surgical treatment of acquired bone defects in the mandible using additive manufacturing by electron beam melting (EBM). Based on computed tomography scans, polygon skulls were created. Following that virtual treatment plans entailing free microvascular transfer of fibula flaps using patient-specific reconstruction plates, mesh, and cutting guides were designed. The design was based on the specification of a Compact UniLOCK 2.4 Large (Synthes®, Switzerland). The obtained polygon plates were bent virtually round the reconstructed mandibles. Next, the resections of the mandibles were planned virtually. A cutting guide was outlined to facilitate resection, as well as plates and titanium mesh for insertion of bone or bone substitutes. Polygon plates and meshes were converted to stereolithography format and used in the software Magics for preparation of input files for the successive step, additive manufacturing. EBM was used to manufacture the customized implants in a biocompatible titanium grade, Ti6Al4V ELI. The implants and the cutting guide were cleaned and sterilized, then transferred to the operating theater, and applied during surgery. Commercially available software programs are sufficient in order to virtually plan for production of patient-specific implants. Furthermore, EBM-produced implants are fully usable under clinical conditions in reconstruction of acquired defects in the mandible. A good compliance between the treatment plan and the fit was demonstrated during operation. Within the constraints of this article, the authors describe a workflow for production of patient-specific implants, using EBM manufacturing. Titanium cutting guides, reconstruction plates for fixation of microvascular transfer of osteomyocutaneous bone grafts, and mesh to replace resected bone that can function as a carrier for bone or bone substitutes were designed and tested during reconstructive maxillofacial surgery. A clinically fit, well within the requirements for what is needed and obtained using traditional free hand bending of commercially available devices, or even higher precision, was demonstrated in ablative surgery in four patients.

scholarly journals “6 Anatomical Landmarks” Technique for Satisfactory Free-Hand Orbital Reconstruction With Standard Preformed Titanium Mesh

2021 ◽  
pp. 194338752110076
Author(s):  
Gabriele Canzi ◽  
Federica Corradi ◽  
Giorgio Novelli ◽  
Alberto Bozzetti ◽  
Davide Sozzi
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Orbital Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Specific Implants ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objective: Resolution of clinical signs and symptoms following orbital fractures depends on the accurate restoration of the orbital volume. Computer-Assisted procedures and Patient Specific Implants represent modern solutions, but they require additional resources. A more reproducible option is the use of standard preformed titanium meshes, widely available and cheaper; with their use quality of results is proportional to the accuracy with which they are positioned. This work identifies 6 reproducible and constant anatomical landmarks, as an intraoperative guide for the precise positioning of titanium preformed meshes. Methods: 90 patients treated at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Niguarda Trauma Center, Milan, for unilateral orbital reconstruction (January 2012 to December 2018), were studied. In all cases reconstruction was performed respecting the 6 proposed anatomical landmarks. The outcomes analyzed are: post-operative CT adherence to the 6 anatomical markers and symmetry achieved respect to controlateral orbit; number/year of re-interventions and duration of surgery; resolution of clinical defects (at least 12-months follow-up); incidence of complications. Results: Satisfactory results were obtained in terms of restoration of orbital size, shape and volume. Clinical defects early recovered with a low incidence of complications and re-interventions. Operating times and radiological accuracy have shown a progressive improvement during years of application of this technique. Conclusions: The proposed “6 anatomical landmarks” is an easy free-hand technique that allows everyone to obtain high levels of reconstructive accuracy and it should be a skill of all surgeons who deal with orbital reconstruction in daily clinical activity.

Development of JIT patient-specific implants

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne SOBEL ◽  
Katrina SKELLERN ◽  
Kat PEREIRA
Keyword(s):  
Design Thinking ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Project Team ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Strategy Development ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Critical System ◽  
Patient Specific Implants ◽  
Human Centred Design

Design thinking and human-centred design is often discussed and utilised by teams and organisations seeking to develop more optimal, effective or innovative solutions for better customer outcomes. In the healthcare sector the opportunity presented by the practice of human-centred design and design thinking in the pursuit of better patient outcomes is a natural alignment. However, healthcare challenges often involve complex problem sets, many stakeholders, large systems and actors that resist change. High-levels of investment and risk aversion results in the status quo of traditional technology-led processes and analytical decision-making dominating product and strategy development. In this case study we present the opportunities, challenges and benefits that including a design-led approach in developing complex healthcare technology can bring. Drawing on interviews with participants and reflections from the project team, we explore and articulate the key learning from using a design-led approach. In particular we discuss how design-led practices that place patients at the heart of technology development facilitated the project team in aligning key stakeholders, unearthing critical system considerations, and identifying product and sector-wide opportunities.

scholarly journals Development, conception and modulization of patient-specific miniplate in maxillofacial surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 100136
Author(s):  
Ouassime Kerdoud ◽  
Rachid Aloua ◽  
Faiçal Slimani ◽  
Abdellah Boualam
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Patient Specific

Fused filament printing of specialized biomedical devices: a state-of-the art review of technological feasibilities with PEEK

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erfan Rezvani Ghomi ◽  
Saeideh Kholghi Eshkalak ◽  
Sunpreet Singh ◽  
Amutha Chinnappan ◽  
Seeram Ramakrishna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Biomedical Devices ◽  
Fused Filament Fabrication ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Patient Specific Implants ◽  
Complex Design ◽  
Wide Range

Purpose The potential implications of the three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology are growing enormously in the various health-care sectors, including surgical planning, manufacturing of patient-specific implants and developing anatomical models. Although a wide range of thermoplastic polymers are available as 3DP feedstock, yet obtaining biocompatible and structurally integrated biomedical devices is still challenging owing to various technical issues. Design/methodology/approach Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is an organic and biocompatible compound material that is recently being used to fabricate complex design geometries and patient-specific implants through 3DP. However, the thermal and rheological features of PEEK make it difficult to process through the 3DP technologies, for instance, fused filament fabrication. The present review paper presents a state-of-the-art literature review of the 3DP of PEEK for potential biomedical applications. In particular, a special emphasis has been given on the existing technical hurdles and possible technological and processing solutions for improving the printability of PEEK. Findings The reviewed literature highlighted that there exist numerous scientific and technical means which can be adopted for improving the quality features of the 3D-printed PEEK-based biomedical structures. The discussed technological innovations will help the 3DP system to enhance the layer adhesion strength, structural stability, as well as enable the printing of high-performance thermoplastics. Originality/value The content of the present manuscript will motivate young scholars and senior scientists to work in exploring high-performance thermoplastics for 3DP applications.

scholarly journals Additive manufacturing in medical sciences: past, present and the future

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Lakshya P. Rathore ◽  
Naina Verma
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Biological Tissue ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Basic Fact ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
Patient Specific Implants ◽  
Tissue Replacement ◽  
The Future

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a novel technique that despite having been around for more than 35 years, has been underutilized. Its great advantage lies in the basic fact that it is incredibly customizable. Since its use was recognized in various fields of medicine like orthopaedics, otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology etc, it has proved to be one of the most promising developments in most of them. Customizable orthotics, prosthetics and patient specific implants and tracheal splints are few of its advantages. And in the future too, the combination of tissue engineering with AM is believed to produce an immense change in biological tissue replacement.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Accuracy and Clinical Parameters of Patient-Specific and Conventionally Bended Plates for Mandibular Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henriette L. Möllmann ◽  
Laura Apeltrath ◽  
Nadia Karnatz ◽  
Max Wilkat ◽  
Erik Riedel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computer Assisted Surgery ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Mandibular Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Patient Specific Implants ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Training

ObjectivesThis retrospective study compared two mandibular reconstruction procedures—conventional reconstruction plates (CR) and patient-specific implants (PSI)—and evaluated their accuracy of reconstruction and clinical outcome.MethodsOverall, 94 patients had undergone mandibular reconstruction with CR (n = 48) and PSI (n = 46). Six detectable and replicable anatomical reference points, identified via computer tomography, were used for defining the mandibular dimensions. The accuracy of reconstruction was assessed using pre- and postoperative differences.ResultsIn the CR group, the largest difference was at the lateral point of the condyle mandibulae (D2) -1.56 mm (SD = 3.8). In the PSI group, the largest difference between preoperative and postoperative measurement was shown at the processus coronoid (D5) with +1.86 mm (SD = 6.0). Significant differences within the groups in pre- and postoperative measurements were identified at the gonion (D6) [t(56) = -2.217; p = .031 <.05]. In the CR group, the difference was 1.5 (SD = 3.9) and in the PSI group -1.04 (SD = 4.9). CR did not demonstrate a higher risk of plate fractures and post-operative complications compared to PSI.ConclusionFor reconstructing mandibular defects, CR and PSI are eligible. In each case, the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches must be assessed. The functional and esthetic outcome of mandibular reconstruction significantly improves with the experience of the surgeon in conducting microvascular grafts and familiarity with computer-assisted surgery. Interoperator variability can be reduced, and training of younger surgeons involved in planning can be reaching better outcomes in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document