Gewichtung von Umweltbelastungen im Green Productivity Index

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-125
Author(s):  
Verena L. Aufderheide ◽  
Marion Steven
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinwoo Lee ◽  
Dong-Woon Noh ◽  
Dong-hyun Oh

This study measures and decomposes green productivity growth of Korean manufacturing industries between 2004 and 2010 using the Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. We focus on differences in the measures of productivity growth by distinguishing carbon emissions from either end-user industries or the electricity generation industry. Empirical results suggest three main findings. First, the efficiency of total emissions is higher than that of direct emissions except for the shipbuilding industry. Second, green productivity in the manufacturing sector increased during the study period. Finally, green productivity depends on the indirect emissions of each industry. These results indicate that policymakers need to deliberately develop policy tools for mitigating carbon emissions of the manufacturing industrial sectors based on our empirical findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 3122
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang ◽  
Hong Fang

Apart from promoting social-economic development and increasing social employment, the real estate industry in China has also brought up problems such as high energy consumption and high emissions. Scholars now focus more on energy conservation, emission reduction and sustainable development of real estate companies in their current research. The data used by this paper are three-year panel data from 2015 to 2018, with observations from 15 representative real estate companies. CO2 and green credit index are introduced as the undesirable output and the green output of real estate companies respectively. First, with the DEA model and the Malmquist index model, this paper evaluates the green productivity of real estate companies statically and dynamically. The Tobit model is then employed by the author to analyze factors that may affect green productivity. Our results indicate that (1) the green productivities of 15 Chinese real estate companies have improved by various degrees. The average green productivity rises from 0.701 in 2015 to 0.849 in 2018, indicating that the energy utilization rate of enterprises has gradually increased. From the calculation and decomposition of the Malmquist total factor productivity index, we know that technological progress is vital in improving the green productivity of real estate companies. (2) As for the influencing factors, the green productivity is positively related to factors such as policy compliance indicator P, environmental responsibility commitment indicator R, indicator of green innovation capability I, and indicator of green development information disclosure M. The asset-liability ratio on the contrary has a negative impact on green productivity. It’s worth to point out that the green innovation index and green productivity is significantly correlated and the correlation coefficient can be up to 0.636, which implies that the key to improving green productivity is to increase research and development investment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 07023
Author(s):  
Wahyuni Dini ◽  
Budiman Irwan ◽  
Tambunan Mangara

This research was conducted in companies engaged in the production of furniture in North Sumatra. From observations made, seen piles of scrap pieces of wood from the rest of the production. This study was conducted to select the best alternative to reduce scrap wood with green productivity approach so that productions are going to more economical and productive. Green productivity approach to the reduction of scrap is performed by calculating Green Productivity Index. There are 3 alternative wood scrap reduction, which is: (1) Do not perform any conversion actions; (2) Wood scrap smoothed and pressed into the pressed wood as the “content” of the door, wood scrap that is usually used as a fuel in the boiler is replaced with oil palm pulp; and (3) Purchase the woods with appropriate size and produces scrap as minimum as possible. Alternative 2 was selected as the best alternative to the Green Productivity Index (GPI) Human amounted to 1, GPI Material 1.13, GPICapital1.06, GPI Energy at 1.16, and GPI Waste of 0.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hersandi Hamdan Pratama

Every company certainly wants to increase their productivity, such as by increasing the amount of production. However, as goes by production, important to notice the aspects surrounding of the environment performance. Therefore we need a method to improve productivity and environmental performance simultaneously. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that affect the productivity and environmental performance, and provide suggestions using the method of Green Productivity improvements based on the highest value of Green Productivity Index. Based on research in PG Kebon Agung there are two alternative solutions that improve productivity and environmental performance, but the GPI of alternative 2 is bigger than ternative 1 which is 4,47. The alternative is additional outlet capacity at waste treatment plants. This solution provides increased productivity, where the initial productivity of 136.045% to 136.05%. With the implementation of alternative solutions can improve EPI index up 0.32 so to give an increase in the Index EPI (Environmental Performance Indicator) from 0.46 became 0.78


JUMINTEN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
Amanullah Fathurrahman ◽  
Iriani Iriani ◽  
Dwi Sukma Donoriyanto

CV. ABC merupakan pabrik yang bergerak dalam bidang olahan kayu seperti speaker aktif dan mebel-mebel. Dimana perusahaan tersebut memiliki sebuah komitmen internal dalam proses produksinya, agar dapat mengurangi dampak lingkungan dan memelihara ekosistem disekitarnya. Namun dalam kenyataannya, dalam proses produksinya baku mutu air perusahaan melebihi dari standar PERGUBJATIM No. 72 Tahun 2013, COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand) yang diatas batas standar sebesar 61,40 mg/l dan Oil and Grease sebesar 12 mg/l. Dimana akan berdampak pada lingkungan sekitar yang dapat mengganggu kesehatan lingkungan sekitar, selain itu dapat berdampak menurunnya produktivitas dan kinerja lingkungan perusahaan. Dengan adanya permasalahan tersebut pendekatan yang tepat untuk membantu perusahaan agar dapat mampu meningkatkan produktivitas serta kinerja lingkungan tersebut adalah dengan menerapkan metode Green Productivity (GP). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat mengevaluasi pengelolaan limbah berbasis Green Productivity, serta dapat memberikan usulan perbaikan dalam pengelolaan limbah. Hasil yang didapat diketahui bahwa terdapat 2 alternatif yang dapat menurunkan tingkat BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), TSS (Total Suspeded Solid), Oil and Grease. Akan tetapi solusi yang dapat dijadikan usulan perbaikan adalah alternatif 2, yitu pemasangan alat DAF (Dissolved Air Flotation). Keuntungan yang didapatkan CV. ABC dengan alternatif 2 ini adalah peningkatan Green Productivity Index yang ditunjukan Green Productivity Ratio sebesar 13,06 dan Tingkat Produktivitas meningkat sebesar 0,01 %


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sa Xu ◽  
Zejun Li

This paper from the perspective of productivity changes examines the impact of innovation activities and foreign direct investment (FDI) on improved green productivity (IGP) in developing countries. We divide the sample into two sub-groups; the BRICS and the other developing countries so as to account for underlying country heterogeneity. The analysis follows a panel data approach over the period 1991 to 2014, and used the global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index to measure IGP. The results indicate that IGP in developing countries has declined. Innovation activities have a positive impact on IGP. FDI has a significant negative impact on IGP. Further study finds that there are threshold effects between FDI and IGP based on innovation activities, when the developing countries with a low-level of innovation, FDI has a negative impact on IGP; when the developing countries innovation activities above the threshold, innovation activities and FDI both can promote IGP.


2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Ahmad Mubin ◽  
Syaiful Zainuri

Ahmad Mubin DAN Syaiful ZainuriJurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah MalangLaman: [email protected] merupakan hal yang sangat penting bagi perusahaan sebagai salah satu cara untuk memantau kinerjaproduksinya. Pengukuran produktivitas dilakukan untuk mengetahui tingkat kinerja perusahaan dan dapat dijadikansebagai pedoman untuk melakukan perbaikan secara terus-menerus. Demikian pula, aspek lingkungan telah menjadi isupenting dan strategis yang harus disikapi oleh industri dengan baik dan terus ditingkatkan kinerjanya. Agar perusahaanmampu meningkatkan produktivitas sekaligus menurunkan dampak lingkungan perlu digunakan pendekatan modelGreen Productivity. ��������������Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap produktivitasdan kinerja lingkungan, serta memberikan usulan perbaikan menggunakan metode Green Productivity berdasarkannilai indeks Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) tertinggi.��������������������������������������������������������������� Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor yang berpengaruhterhadap produktivitas dan kinerja lingkungan adalah kinerja ketel uap (boiler) dan penanganan limbah cair. Untukmengatasi masalah tersebut, maka diperlukan suatu alternatif perbaikan. Alternatif perbaikan yang diusulkan adalahmemasang Heat Exchanger dan DAF (Dissoveled Air Floatation). Dari hasil estimasi kontribusi, alternatif yang terpilihtersebut dapat memberikan peningkatan yang signifikan yakni indeks produktivitas ketel uap sebesar 103,64% lebih baikdaripada kondisi awal dan untuk indeks produktivitas limbah minyak sebesar 104,18% lebih baik daripada kondisi awal,serta terjadi penurunan kadar CO sebesar 0,19 dan kadar minyak dan lemak sebesar 0,17.Kata kunci: Produktivitas, Kinerja Lingkungan, Green Productivity, Benefit-Cost Ratio.ABSTRACTProductivity is very important for the company as a way to monitor the production performance. Productivitymeasurement is performed to determine the level of productivity performance of the company and can be used as guidelinefor continuous improvement. Similarly, the environmental aspect has become an important and strategic issues that must beaddressed by the industry well and improved its performance continuously. In order to improve productivity while loweringenvironmental impact the company need to use Green Productivity model approach. The purposes of this research were toidentify factors that affect productivity and environmental performance, as well as providing proposed improvement usingGreen Productivity method based on the highest value of the Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) index. The results showed that thefactors that affect productivity and environmental performance are the boiler performance and the wastewater treatment.Therefore to overcome these problems, it was needed an improvement alternative. The improvement alternative proposedwere to install Heat Exchanger and DAF (Dissoveled Air Floatation). From the estimated contribution, the chosen alternativecould provide a significant increase in the productivity index of boiler at 103.64% better than the initial condition andproductivity index of oil waste by 104.18% better than the initial condition, also there were decreased level of CO level at0.19 and 0.17 for oil and fat.Key words: Productivity, Environmental Performance, Green Productivity, Benefit-Cost Ratio


Author(s):  
Nur Indrianti ◽  
Devika Kumala ◽  
Tri Wibawa

Increasing awareness of the importance of services has given rise to the concept of product-service system where goods and services are sold as an integrated package to customers. On the other hand, the emerging sustainability concept has escalated the demand for sustainability for industries. Consequently, it is necessary to build strategies that lead the company to achieve sustainability goals while keeping competitiveness. Drawing on the necessity service and sustainability concept in the quality improvement of the product-service system, this study aims to develop a systematic design tool by filling the gap to the previous studies. We used Quality Function Deployment (QFD) approach by considering customer requirements (VoC) and stakeholder requirements (VoSt), instead of VoC only, based on the service and sustainability dimensions. We refer to the proposed QFD approach as QFDSPS. We introduce service productivity index (SPI) to measure the performance of the system. Thus, in the proposed methodology, the strategies for quality improvement were defined as subject to VoC, VoSt, and SPI. The methodology was implemented in a Javanese restaurant which meets the characteristics of a product-service system. The result shows that the proposed method can be implemented. The implications due to the implementation of the method are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document