Chylothorax is a multi-factorial complication, frequently of an operation or an accident, but rarely of a tumour. In the absence of prospective or randomised studies evidence-based treatment is normally based on personal experience, ideally in the possession of retrospective analyses using the “best practice” method. The aim of the authors was the review the up-to-date chylothorax treatments. They performed the PubMed database’s “chylothorax” keyword search of the publications reported in the last ten years. They put emphasis on articles that included a comparative analysis of the various treatment options. During the critical analysis of the methods and recommendations, the authors relied on their own joint experience amounting to 39 years. The results showed that the success of the initial conservative treatment indicates a significant deviation depending on the etiology (3–90%). The success rate of non-invasive or semi-invasive interventions is between 50–100%, again depending on the etiology. The standard surgical treatment following an unsuccessful conservative treatment of an operable patient includes the fitting of a (thoracoscopic) knot to the ductus thoracicus, pleurodesis, insertion of a permanent chest drain or a pleuroperitoneal shunt. The success rate of these interventions is between 64–100%, with a morbidity index and mortality index exceeding 25%. Conservative treatment should be the first step, which should then be followed by a gradually increased aggressive therapy, during which the decisions should be made according to the patient’s condition and the drain volume. Interventional radiology procedures are safe, successful and they can be offered concurrently with a conservative treatment or operational solutions, although they are available only in a few centres. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(2), 43–51.
What Is the Best Practice Method for Quantifying the Health and Economic Benefits of Active Transport?
