Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar spine, proximal femur and distal radius in children

1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 560-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Tsukahara ◽  
M. Sudo ◽  
M. Umezaki ◽  
M. Hiraoka ◽  
K. Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
X Ray

A Comparison of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurement at the Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur for Postmenopausal Women

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
M.R. Salamat ◽  
S.R. Farzaneh ◽  
H.R. Zeyaei ◽  
M. Mir Bagheri
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
X Ray

scholarly journals Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1109-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongil Choi ◽  
Deog-Yoon Kim ◽  
Chung Soo Han ◽  
Seonwoo Kim ◽  
Hae Sook Bok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Pencil Beam ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
X Ray

scholarly journals Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Yavuz Karahan ◽  
Bugra Kaya ◽  
Banu Kuran ◽  
Ozlem Altındag ◽  
Pelin Yildirim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Bmd Testing ◽  
Study Results

Background: Osteoporosis is a widespread metabolic bone disease representing a global public health problem currently affecting more than two hundred million people worldwide. The World Health Organization states that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the best densitometric technique for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). DXA provides an accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis, a good estimation of fracture risk, and is a useful tool for monitoring patients undergoing treatment. Common mistakes in BMD testing can be divided into four principal categories: 1) indication errors, 2) lack of quality control and calibration, 3) analysis and interpretation errors, and 4) inappropriate acquisition techniques. The aim of this retrospective multicenter descriptive study is to identify the common errors in the application of the DXA technique in Turkey. Methods: All DXA scans performed during the observation period were included in the study if the measurements of both, the lumbar spine and proximal femur were recorded. Forearm measurement, total body measurements, and measurements performed on children were excluded. Each examination was surveyed by 30 consultants from 20 different centers each informed and trained in the principles of and the standards for DXA scanning before the study. Results: A total of 3,212 DXA scan results from 20 different centers in 15 different Turkish cities were collected. The percentage of the discovered erroneous measurements varied from 10.5% to 65.5% in the lumbar spine and from 21.3% to 74.2% in the proximal femur. The overall error rate was found to be 31.8% (n = 1021) for the lumbar spine and 49.0% (n = 1576) for the proximal femur. Conclusion: In Turkey, DXA measurements of BMD have been in use for over 20 years, and examination processes continue to improve. There is no educational standard for operator training, and a lack of knowledge can lead to significant errors in the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation.

scholarly journals The risk of fractures and the need for anti-osteoporotic treatment in patients with systemic sclerosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
A. О. Efremova ◽  
N. V. Toroptsova ◽  
O. V. Dobrovolskaya ◽  
N. V. Demin ◽  
O. A. Nikitinskaya
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
X Ray ◽  
History Of ◽  
Very High

Objective: to estimate the high and very high Frax® 10-year probabilities of fractures in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) to assess the need for anti-osteoporotic treatment.Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 136 SSc patients (110 women and 26 men; mean age, 59.3±7.5 years). The patients underwent a questionnaire survey, by calculating the risk of major fractures with the FRAX® algorithm and dual-energy X-ray densitometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur.Results and discussion. There was a very high risk of fractures in 41.2% of the examinees, a high risk in 10.3%, and a low risk in 48.5%. Osteoporosis (OP) in at least one area was detected in 41.2% of the patients. Among the persons with a low risk of fractures, OP was diagnosed in 18.2%, whereas 10.6% had a history of fractures. A total of 65.4% of SSc patients needed anti-osteoporotic treatment.Conclusion. According to the comprehensive assessment, OP treatment and fracture prevention were indicated for 65.4% of SSc patients. The FRAX® algorithm is less informative in males who need therapy than in females.

scholarly journals POS0045 LEAST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN BONE DENSITOMETRY IN PATIENTS WITH OBESITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 227.2-228
Author(s):  
D. Claire ◽  
M. Geoffroy ◽  
L. Kanagaratnam ◽  
C. Isabelle ◽  
A. Hittinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
General Population ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Bone Densitometry ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Least Significant Change ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Significant Change

Background:Dual energy X-ray absoprtiometry is the reference method to mesure bone mineral density (1). Loss of bone mineral density is significant if it exceeds the least significant change. The threshold value used in general population is 0,03 g/cm2 (2). Patients with obesity are known for having a higher bone mineral density due to metabolism and physiopathology characteristics (3,4).Objectives:The aim of our study was to determine the least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity.Methods:We conducted an interventionnal study in 120 patients with obesity who performed a bone densitometry. We measured twice the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck and the total hip in the same time (5,6). We determined the least significant change in bone densitometry from each pair of measurements, using the Bland and Altman method. We also determined the least significant change in bone densitometry according to each stage of obesity.Results:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is 0,046g/cm2 at the lumbar spine, 0.069 g/cm2 at the femoral neck and 0.06 g/cm2 at the total hip.Conclusion:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is higher than in general population. These results may improve DXA interpretation in this specific population, and may personnalize their medical care.References:[1]Lees B, Stevenson JC. An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. mai 1992;2(3):146-52.[2]Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, et al. Actualisation 2018 des recommandations françaises du traitement de l’ostéoporose post-ménopausique. Rev Rhum. oct 2018;85(5):428-40.[3]Shapses SA, Pop LC, Wang Y. Obesity is a concern for bone health with aging. Nutr Res N Y N. mars 2017;39:1-13.[4]Savvidis C, Tournis S, Dede AD. Obesity and bone metabolism. Hormones. juin 2018;17(2):205-17.[5]Roux C, Garnero P, Thomas T, Sabatier J-P, Orcel P, Audran M, et al. Recommendations for monitoring antiresorptive therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum. janv 2005;72(1):26-31.[6]Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res. août 1999;14(8):1449-56.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals Ability of radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry to identify osteoporosis status in elderly women with type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Caffarelli ◽  
Maria Dea Tomai Pitinca ◽  
Antonella Al Refaie ◽  
Elena Ceccarelli ◽  
Stefano Gonnelli
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Elderly Women ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Diagnosis Of Osteoporosis ◽  
X Ray ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have an increased or normal BMD; however fragility fractures represent one of the most important complications of T2DM. Aims This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of the Radiofrequency Echographic multi spectrometry (REMS) technique may improve the identification of osteoporosis in T2DM patients. Methods In a cohort of 90 consecutive postmenopausal elderly (70.5 ± 7.6 years) women with T2DM and in 90 healthy controls we measured BMD at the lumbar spine (LS-BMD), at femoral neck (FN-BMD) and total hip (TH-BMD) using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry device; moreover, REMS scans were also carried out at the same axial sites. Results DXA measurements were all higher in T2DM than in non-T2DM women; instead, all REMS measurements were lower in T2DM than in non T2DM women. Moreover, the percentage of T2DM women classified as “osteoporotic”, on the basis of BMD by REMS was markedly higher with respect to those classified by DXA (47.0% vs 28.0%, respectively). On the contrary, the percentage of T2DM women classified as osteopenic or normal by DXA was higher with respect to that by REMS (48.8% and 23.2% vs 38.6% and 14.5%, respectively). T2DM women with fragility fractures presented lower values of both BMD-LS by DXA and BMD-LS by REMS with respect to those without fractures; however, the difference was significant only for BMD-LS by REMS (p < 0.05). Conclusions Our data suggest that REMS technology may represent a useful approach to enhance the diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with T2DM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document