Molecular mapping of QTLs for Karnal bunt resistance in two recombinant inbred populations of bread wheat

2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhwinder Singh ◽  
Indu Sharma ◽  
Sunish K. Sehgal ◽  
Navtej S. Bains ◽  
Zhigang Guo ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Singh ◽  
S. Rajaram ◽  
J. Montoya ◽  
G. Fuentes-Davila

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHEN-HUNG KAO ◽  
MIAO-HUI ZENG

SummaryIn genetic and biological studies, the F2 population is one of the most popular and commonly used experimental populations mainly because it can be readily produced and its genome structure possesses several niceties that allow for productive investigation. These niceties include the equivalence between the proportion of recombinants and recombination rates, the capability of providing a complete set of three genotypes for every locus and an analytically attractive first-order Markovian property. Recently, there has been growing interest in using the progeny populations from F2 (advanced populations) because their genomes can be managed to meet specific purposes or can be used to enhance investigative studies. These advanced populations include recombinant inbred populations, advanced intercrossed populations, intermated recombinant inbred populations and immortalized F2 populations. Due to an increased number of meiosis cycles, the genomes of these advanced populations no longer possess the Markovian property and are relatively more complicated and different from the F2 genomes. Although issues related to quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using advanced populations have been well documented, still these advanced populations are often investigated in a manner similar to the way F2 populations are studied using a first-order Markovian assumption. Therefore, more efforts are needed to address the complexities of these advanced populations in more details. In this article, we attempt to tackle these issues by first modifying current methods developed under this Markovian assumption to propose an ad hoc method (the Markovian method) and explore its possible problems. We then consider the specific genome structures present in the advanced populations without invoking this assumption to propose a more adequate method (the non-Markovian method) for QTL mapping. Further, some QTL mapping properties related to the confounding problems that result from ignoring epistasis and to mapping closely linked QTL are derived and investigated across the different populations. Simulations show that the non-Markovian method outperforms the Markovian method, especially in the advanced populations subject to selfing. The results presented here may give some clues to the use of advanced populations for more powerful and precise QTL mapping.


2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (No. 2) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.S. Patil ◽  
R.L. Ravikumar ◽  
J.S. Bhat ◽  
C.D. Soregaon

A molecular map of chickpea was constructed using F<sub>9</sub>:F<sub>10</sub> recombinant inbred lines from an intraspecific cross between Fusarium wilt susceptible (JG 62) and resistant (WR 315) genotypes. A total of 23 markers with LOD scores of &gt; 3.0 were mapped on the recombinant inbred lines (RILs). Twenty sequence tagged microsatellites (STMSs) and three amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) covered 300.2 cM in five linkage groups at an average inter-marker distance of 13 cM. Early and late wilting due to Fusarium infection was recorded in RILs at 30&nbsp;and 60 DAS, respectively. There was a significant variation among RILs for wilt resistance for both early and late wilting. QTLs associated with early (30 days after sowing (DAS)) and late (60&nbsp;DAS) wilting are located on LG II. The flanking markers for these QTLs were the same as those of previous reports. Five STMS markers located on LG II of reference map (interspecific) were mapped on LG II of the present map (intraspecific) with minor changes in the order of markers indicating the conservation of these genomic regions across the Cicer species.


Euphytica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 217 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asena Akkose Baytar ◽  
Ceng Peynircioğlu ◽  
Volkan Sezener ◽  
Anne Frary ◽  
Sami Doğanlar

2004 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. I. G. Haussmann ◽  
D. E. Hess ◽  
G. O. Omanya ◽  
R. T. Folkertsma ◽  
B. V. S. Reddy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document