scholarly journals Does the type of surgical approach affect the clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricarda Lechner ◽  
Matteo Lazzeri ◽  
Wilhelm Oberaigner ◽  
Paul Nardelli ◽  
Tobias Roth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Prosthesis Survival ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to investigate the issue of medial midvastus (MMV) vs. medial parapatellar (MPP) approaches in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that the two surgical approaches would produce significantly different results with respect to patient-reported knee score outcome (hypothesis 1), short-term postoperative range of motion (ROM) (hypothesis 2), long-term postoperative ROM (hypothesis 3) and prosthesis survival (hypothesis 4). Methods A retrospective comparative study design was applied. Data sets were obtained from the state arthroplasty registry. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) data were analyzed from preoperative and 1 year postoperatively. The ROM data were analyzed for the time points preoperative, postoperative days 4 and 10 and 1 year. Results Available were 627 cases (407 MMV vs. 220 MPP) and 1 year postoperatively there were no significant differences between groups regarding the WOMAC scores (hypothesis 1). Early postoperatively on days 4 and 10 after TKA there were no differences between groups (p = 0.305 and p = 0.383, respectively, hypothesis 2). Likewise, ROM did not significantly differ between the groups 1 year after TKA (p = 0.338, hypothesis 3). The 5‑year prosthesis survival did not differ between the groups and showed 94.46% (95% confidence interval, CI 90.69–96.73%) in the MMV group and 94.33% (95% CI 89.96–96.83%) in the MPP group (p = 0.664, hypothesis 4). Conclusion Both surgical approaches produce equivalent clinical results in terms of early postoperative ROM, late postoperative ROM and 1‑year WOMAC. The same prosthesis survival rates can be expected.

scholarly journals Slight femoral under-correction versus neutral alignment in total knee arthroplasty with preoperative varus knees: a comparative study

Arthroplasty ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Lei ◽  
Li-Ming Liu ◽  
Peng-Fei Yang ◽  
Ran Xiong ◽  
De-Jie Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Tourniquet Time ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Neutral Alignment

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the short-term clinical results of slight femoral under-correction with neutral alignment in patients with preoperative varus knees who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Methods The medical records and imaging data were retrospectively collected from patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2019. All patients had varus knees preoperatively. Upon 1:1 propensity score matching, 256 patients (256 knees) were chosen and divided into a neutral alignment group (n=128) and an under-correction group (n=128). The patients in the neutral group were treated with the neutral alignment. In the under-correction group, the femoral mechanical axis had a 2° under-correction. The operative time, tourniquet time and the length of hospital stay in the two groups were recorded. The postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, frontal femoral component angle and frontal tibial component angle were measured. Patient-reported outcome measures were also compared. Results The operative time, tourniquet time and the length of hospital stay in the under-correction group were significantly shorter than the neutral alignment group (P<0.05). At the 2-year follow-up, the under-correction group had a larger varus alignment (P<0.05) and a larger frontal femoral component angle (P<0.05), and the frontal tibial component angles of the two groups were comparable. Compared with the neutral alignment group, the slight femoral under-correction group had significantly better patient-reported outcome measures scores (P<0.05). Conclusion For varus knees treated with total knee arthroplasty, alignment with a slight femoral under-correction has advantages over the neutral alignment in terms of the shorter operative time and better short-term clinical results. Level of evidence III

scholarly journals Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (BKA) in comparison to unicompartmental (UKA), Patellofemoral (PFA) ans total knee arthroplasty (TKA) – Early Clinical Results

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0023
Author(s):  
Johannes Holz ◽  
Stefan Schneider ◽  
Ansgar Ilg ◽  
Rene Kaiser
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee Replacement ◽  
Knee Replacement ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Bicompartmental Arthroplasty

Aims and Objectives: The purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with bicompartmental arthroplasty (BKA) in comparison to unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a single center. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study analyzing a consecutive series of 396 patients from two surgeons in a single center. In 191 men and 205 women either partial or total knee replacement were performed. Their mean age at surgery was 63±6,85 years and mean BMI 29,55±5,00 kg/m2. In 238 patients UKA, in 125 TKA, in 21 PFA and in 11 patients BKA was performed. Implants were cemented and made of cobalt chrome in partial knee and zirconium oxide in total knee replacement. Demographics and patient reported outcomes (VAS, KOOS, Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) were collected preoperatively and 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 202 patients have thus far completed the 12 months follow-up time point. Results: All mean KOOS and OKS scores improved significantly 1 year after surgery (p<0.05). Mean preoperative aggregated KOOS improved from 49,0±14,1 to 74,3±17,8 in UKA, from 44,1±12,9 to 67,5±9,4 in PFA, from 46,1±15,1 to 71,0±14,8 in TKA and from 45,7±13,8 to 72,6±9,7 in BKA (p<0.05). Mean preoperative aggregated OKS improved from 25,1±7,6) to 38,5±9,7 in UKA, from 23,0±7,6 to 36,8±3,8 in PFA, from 23,4±8,2 to 37,3±8,1 in TKA and from 22,9±9,6 to 37,0±1,5 in BKA (p<0.05). The mean pain level (VAS)decreased from pre-treatment to 12 months after surgery in UKA from 5,5 to 1,6, in PFA from 6,1 to 2,5, in TKA from 6,0 to 1,9 and in BKA from 6,6 to 2,6. One patient (0.4%) underwent revision (at 3 month for inlay dislocation). Conclusion: This study shows excellent early clinical results of patients treated with unicompartmental, bicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. Adherence to strict indications lead to a significant improvement of patient reported outcomes and a low revision rate one year postoperatively. The reported results for BKA are comparable to those of patients treated with unicompartmental arthroplasty. We conclude that bicompartmental arthroplasty is a safe and reliable surgery for patients with bicompartmental osteoarthritis.

Does Posterior Condylar Offset Affect Clinical Results following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (08) ◽  
pp. 754-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Degen ◽  
Jacob Matz ◽  
Matthew Teeter ◽  
Brent Lanting ◽  
James Howard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Posterior Condylar Offset ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Posterior Condylar ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective, durable treatment for knee osteoarthritis. However, a subset of patients experiences incomplete pain relief and ongoing dysfunction. Posterior condylar offset (PCO) has previously been shown to be associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) following TKA; however, an association with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between PCO and postoperative ROM and PROMs. A retrospective review of 970 posterior-stabilized single design TKAs was performed. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed to measure the change in PCO and anteroposterior (AP) femoral dimension. Clinical outcome measures, including Short Form-12 physical and mental component summaries, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and Knee Society Score were reviewed to determine if these were influenced by changes in PCO and AP dimension. PCO was increased by more than 3 mm in 15.1%, maintained (within 3 mm) in 59.6%, and decreased by more than 3 mm in 25.3% of patients. Comparing between these groups, there were no significant differences in postoperative ROM or PROM. AP dimension increased in 24.4%, maintained in 47.8%, and decreased in 27.8%. Similarly, there were no significant differences in ROM or PROM between these groups. Spearman's correlation analyses failed to identify an association between PCO and ROM or PROMs. In conclusion, increasing or decreasing PCO or AP femoral dimension with this PS TKA design did not significantly affect postoperative ROM or PROM. Similarly, maintenance of PCO within one implant size with this system compared with optimal sizing had no deleterious effect on TKA outcomes.

scholarly journals Better Short-term Function After Unicompartmental Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Tille ◽  
Franziska Beyer ◽  
Kai Auerbach ◽  
Marco Tinius ◽  
Jörg Lützner
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient’S Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Matching Criteria

Abstract BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established treatment option for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). However, strict patient selection is crucial for its success. The proposed advantages include nearly natural knee kinematics, faster rehabilitation and better functional outcomes. Despite these facts and it’s proven cost-effectiveness, there are hesitations for the use of UKA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Key objectives of this study were therefore to assess clinical and patient-reported-outcome (PRO) as well as patient’s satisfaction after medial UKA in comparison to TKA. MethodsTo assess the outcome after UKA we conducted a prospective multi-center study. 116 patients with unicompartmental OA and indication for UKA were included. Overall 54 females and 62 males with an average age of 62.7 years (±9.8) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 (± 3.7) were recruited. Clinical results and PRO were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery including clinical examination, radiographs, assessment of PRO and adverse events. Pain and satisfaction were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 (worst) to 10 (best)).For comparison with TKA a propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed to eliminate confounders. Matching criteria were gender, patient´s age, BMI and comorbidities. A total of 116 matched-pairs were analysed. ResultsThere was no revision in the UKA group until 2 years after surgery. Revision rates were higher in the TKA group (0.6%).Preoperative KSS-Scores were higher within the UKA cohort (p < 0.001). After surgical treatment, PROMs displayed a significant improvement (p < 0,001) in both cohorts. Regarding the Knee-Score (Pain, Alignment, ROM) we observed no differences between cohorts after 12 months. The Function-Score demonstrated significantly better results in the UKA cohort (UKA vs. TKA 95 vs 80, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in UKA patients (UKA vs TKA 9.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.019).ConclusionPatients of both cohorts showed high satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. UKA resulted in higher function scores compared to TKA without increased revision rate during short-term follow-up. Therefore, UKA is a good treatment option for unicompartmental OA. Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04598568. Registered 22 October 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04598568?cond=balanSys+Uni&draw=2&rank=1

scholarly journals Better short-term function after unicompartmental compared to total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Tille ◽  
Franziska Beyer ◽  
Kai Auerbach ◽  
Marco Tinius ◽  
Jörg Lützner
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient’S Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Matching Criteria

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established treatment option for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). However, strict patient selection is crucial for its success. The proposed advantages include nearly natural knee kinematics, faster rehabilitation and better functional outcomes. Despite the aforementioned facts and it’s proven cost-effectiveness, there are still hesitations for the use of UKA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Key objectives of this study were therefore to assess clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) as well as patient’s satisfaction after medial UKA in comparison to TKA. Methods To assess the outcome after UKA we conducted a prospective multi-center study. 116 patients with unicompartmental OA and indication for UKA were included. Overall 54 females and 62 males with an average age of 62.7 years (±9.8) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 (± 3.7) were recruited. Clinical results and PRO were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery including clinical examination, radiographs, assessment of PRO and adverse events. Pain and satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 (worst) to 10 (best)). For comparison with TKA a propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed to eliminate confounders. Matching criteria were gender, patient’s age, BMI and comorbidities. A total of 116 matched-pairs were analysed. Results There was no revision in the UKA group until 2 years after surgery. Revision rates were higher in the TKA group (0.6%). Preoperative KSS-Scores were higher within the UKA cohort (p <  0.001). After surgical treatment, PROMs displayed a significant improvement (p <  0,001) in both cohorts. Regarding the Knee-Score (Pain, Alignment, ROM) we observed no differences between cohorts after 12 months. The Function-Score demonstrated significantly better results in the UKA cohort (UKA vs. TKA 95 vs 80, p <  0.001). Patient satisfaction was also higher in UKA patients (UKA vs TKA 9.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.019). Conclusion Patients of both cohorts showed high satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. UKA resulted in higher function scores compared to TKA without increased revision rate during short-term follow-up. Therefore, UKA is a good treatment option for unicompartmental OA. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04598568. Registered 22 October 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Did Not Show Superior Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with at Least 2-Year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Hiyama ◽  
Tsuneari Takahashi ◽  
Katsushi Takeshita
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractKinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KATKA) was developed to improve the anatomical alignment of knee prostheses, assisting in restoring the native alignment of the knee and promoting physiological kinematics. Early clinical results were encouraging, showing better functional outcomes than with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MATKA). However, there have been concerns about implant survival, and follow-up at 10 years or more has not been reported. In addition, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KATKA with MATKA have reported inconsistent results. The current meta-analysis of RCTs with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up investigated the clinical and radiological differences between KATKA and MATKA. A systematic review of the English language literature resulted in the inclusion of four RCTs. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in any of the following parameters: postoperative range of motion for flexion (mean difference for KATKA − MATKA [MD], 1.7 degrees; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.4 to 4.8 degrees; p = 0.29) and extension (MD, 0.10 degrees; 95% CI, −0.99 to 1.2 degrees; p = 0.86); Oxford Knee Score (MD, 0.10 points; 95% CI, −1.5 to 1.7 points; p = 0.90); Knee Society Score (MD, 1.6 points; 95% CI, −2.8 to 6.0 points; p = 0.49); and Knee Function Score (MD, 1.4 points; 95% CI, −4.9 to 7.8 points; p = 0.66). In addition, there was no significant difference between KATKA and MATKA in the rate of complications requiring reoperation or revision surgery (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.25–4.09; p = 0.99) or in the length of hospital stay (MD, 1.0 days; 95% CI, −0.2 to 2.2 days; p = 0.092). KATKA did not increase the number of patients with poor clinical results due to implant position, particularly for varus placement of the tibial component. In this meta-analysis based on four RCTs with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, KATKA were only relevant to cruciate retaining TKA and could not be extrapolated to posterior stabilized TKA. Patient-reported outcome measures with KATKA were not superior to those with MATKA.

scholarly journals Mini-midvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: difference in patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Lin ◽  
Jinghui Niu ◽  
Yike Dai ◽  
Guangmin Yang ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Forgotten Joint Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Medial Parapatellar

Abstract Background: Low knee awareness after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the ultimate target of a natural feeling knee that meet patient expectations. The objective of this research was to compare the clinical outcomes of TKA via the mini-midvastus (MMV) approach or medial parapatellar (MPP) approach and expound which approach can acquire better quality of life after surgery.Methods: From January 2015 to December 2016, a retrospective cohort study was conducted in 330 patients who underwent TKA via mini-midvastus (MMV) approach were included in MMV group. In this period, we selected 330 patients who underwent TKA via medial parapatellar (MPP) approach (MPP group) for comparison. Clinical results were assessed with visual analogue score for pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS). The forgotten joint score (FJS) was used to analyze the ability to forget the joint.Results: There were significant differences with regard to VAS, ROM and KSS score until six months after surgery between the MMV and MPP group (p < 0.05), but the differences were not found at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months after surgery. However, there were significant differences with regard to FJS score between the groups during the follow up time (p < 0.05).Conclusion: When forgetting the artificial joint after TKA is the ultimate target, better quality of life can be acquired by performing TKA via the MMV approach. In addition, compared with MPP approach, the MMV approach could offer less pain and faster recovery.

Should Sequential Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Be Limited to Patients Younger than 80? A Two-Arm Propensity Matched Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
Sven Edward Putnis ◽  
Wai Weng Yeo ◽  
Darli Myat ◽  
Brett Andrew Fritsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Proper Patient Selection ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractDespite multiple studies, there remains a debate on the safety of bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) in the average age patient, with a paucity of data on the outcome of BTKA in an elderly population. This study included 89 patients aged 80 years and older undergoing sequential BTKA over 14 years were identified in a prospectively collected database. Two matched comparison groups were created: patients under 80 undergoing sequential BTKA and patients over 80 undergoing unilateral TKA (UTKA). An analysis of complications, mortality, revision, and patient-reported outcome measures was performed. Mean age of the elderly cohorts was similar: 82.6 for BTKA and 82.9 for UTKA. The average age BTKA cohort had a mean age of 69.1. Complication rates were higher in bilateral cohorts, more so in the elderly BTKA cohort. Pulmonary embolism (PE) was observed in bilateral cohorts only. In these patients, history of PE and ischemic heart disease was a strong predictive factor for developing a major complication. There was no difference in revision rates and infection rates between the three cohorts, and no difference in patient survivorship between the two elderly cohorts. Through the combination of low revision and high survivorship rates and comparable clinical outcomes, this article demonstrates that simultaneous BTKA is an appropriate option to consider for an elderly patient, with proper patient selection and perioperative management. The demonstrated risk groups show that emphasis on patient selection should be focused on medical history rather than chronological age.

scholarly journals Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake von Hintze ◽  
Mika Niemeläinen ◽  
Harri Sintonen ◽  
Jyrki Nieminen ◽  
Antti Eskelinen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term clinical, radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes and define the survival rate in patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the single rotating hinged knee (RHK) design. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2013, 125 revision TKAs were performed at our institution using the single RHK implant. We conducted both a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data of these patients and a prospective follow-up study of all 39 living patients (41 knees). The follow-up phase included an optional extra follow-up visit, PROM questionnaires, and plain radiographs. Results The ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the revision RHK knees was 81.7% (95% CI 71.9–91.6%) with re-revision for any reason as the endpoint. Overall, 15 knees (12% of the total) underwent re-revision surgery during the follow-up. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0–12.7 years) post-operatively for the baseline group. One mechanical hinge mechanism-related failure occurred without any history of trauma or infection. At the time of the final follow-up, the majority of patients evinced a fairly good clinical outcome measured with patient-reported outcome measures and none of the components were radiographically loose. Conclusion We found that in patients undergoing complex revision TKA, fairly good functional outcome and quality of life can be achieved using an RHK implant. Further, it seems that in this type of patient cohort, revision TKA using an RHK implant relieves pain more than it improves ability to function. The NexGen® RHK design can be regarded as a suitable option in complex revision TKA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document