scholarly journals Impact of early vs. delayed initiation of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery in LUTS/BPH patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms at risk of disease progression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore D’Agate ◽  
Chandrashekhar Chavan ◽  
Michael Manyak ◽  
Juan Manuel Palacios-Moreno ◽  
Matthias Oelke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Risk Of Disease

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the effect of delayed start of combination therapy (CT) with dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg on the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery (AUR/S) in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at risk of disease progression. Methods Using a time-to-event model based on pooled data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials, clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed to assess the risk of AUR/S up to 48 months in moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH patients following immediate and delayed start of CT for those not responding to tamsulosin monotherapy. Simulation scenarios (1300 subjects/arm) were investigated, including immediate start (reference) and alternative delayed start (six scenarios 1–24 months). AUR/S incidence was described by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and analysed using log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events as well as the relative and attributable risks were summarised stratified by treatment. Results Survival curves for patients starting CT at month 1 and 3 did not differ from those who initiated CT immediately. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed when switch to CT occurs ≥ 6 months from the initial treatment. At month 48, AUR/S incidence was 4.6% vs 9.5%, 11.0% and 11.3% in patients receiving immediate CT vs. switchers after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions Start of CT before month 6 appears to significantly reduce the risk of AUR/S compared with delayed start by ≥ 6 months. This has implications for the treatment algorithm for men with LUTS/BPH at risk of disease progression.

REGARD: A phase III, randomized, double-blinded trial of ramucirumab and best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo and BSC in the treatment of metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma following disease progression on first-line platinum- and/or fluoropyrimidine-containing combination therapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5-LBA5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Jiri Tomasek ◽  
Jae Yong Cho ◽  
Filip Dumitru ◽  
Rodolfo Passalacqua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cancer Pathogenesis ◽  
Line Therapy

LBA5 Background: VEGF and VEGF receptor-2 mediated signaling and angiogenesis may contribute to gastric cancer pathogenesis. Ramucirumab (RAM; IMC-1121B) is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF-receptor 2. We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III international trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RAM in pts with metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma progressing on first-line platinum- and/or fluoropyrimidine containing combination therapy. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive RAM (8 mg/kg IV) plus BSC or placebo (PL) plus BSC every 2 weeks (wks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Eligible patients had disease progression within 4 months (m) after 1st-line therapy for metastatic disease or within 6 m after adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 12-wk PFS rate, overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: From 10/09 to 01/12, 355 pts were randomized (RAM: 238; PL: 117). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. The Hazard Ratio (HR) for OS was 0.776 (95% CI, 0.603-0.998; p = 0.0473). Median OS was 5.2 m for RAM and 3.8 m for PL. The HR for PFS was 0.483 (95% CI, 0.376-0.620; p < 0.0001). Median PFS was 2.1 m for RAM and 1.3 m for PL. 12-wk PFS was 40% for RAM and 16% for PL. ORR was 3.4% for RAM and 2.6% for PL. Disease control rate was 49% for RAM and 23% for PL (p < 0.0001). Use of anti-cancer therapy post-study: 32% RAM; 39% PL. The most frequent of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were: hypertension (7.2% RAM; 2.6% PL), anemia (6.4% RAM; 7.8% PL), abdominal pain (5.1% RAM; 2.6% PL), ascites (4.2% RAM; 4.3% PL), fatigue (4.2% RAM; 3.5% PL), decreased appetite (3.4% RAM; 3.5% PL) and hyponatremia (3.4% RAM; 0.9% PL). Conclusions: Ramucirumab conferred a statistically significant benefit in OS and PFS compared to PL in metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma following progression on 1st-line therapy with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT00917384.

Is RECIST-defined progression free-survival a meaningful endpoint in the era of immunotherapy?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhvinder Johal ◽  
Irene Santi ◽  
Justin Doan ◽  
Saby George
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Apparent Lack ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Beyond Progression ◽  
Significant Difference

488 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is often used as a primary endpoint in oncology clinical trials as a surrogate for overall survival. Traditionally, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have defined disease progression as a significant increase in the size of tumor lesions and the development of new lesions. However, some patients starting immunotherapy have shown initial increased size of tumor lesions followed by tumor regression, due to the unique mechanism of action of immunotherapies. This initial “pseudo-progression” could be classified inaccurately as disease progression, as evidenced by benefit from the treatment beyond progression approach ( JAMA Oncol 2016). The phase III CheckMate 025 trial of nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma allowed treatment beyond progression if there was investigator-assessed clinical benefit and tolerability. The purpose of our study was to test if treatment duration for an immunotherapy was different from RECIST-defined PFS, and as such, could potentially explain the apparent lack of correlation between RECIST progression and overall survival shown in CheckMate 025. Methods: Using 1-year data from CheckMate 025, Kaplan–Meier methodology was used to estimate the median duration of PFS and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Stratified log-rank test was used to assess the difference in treatments. Results: For all patients, the median PFS with nivolumab was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4 months) and median TTD was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.7 months). For everolimus, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.5 months) and median TTD was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7–4.6 months). Conclusions: Patients in CheckMate 025 had significantly longer survival with nivolumab than with everolimus, but with similar PFS. Our analysis demonstrated that while PFS was similar to TTD with everolimus, there was a significant difference between the 2 measures for nivolumab, suggesting that RECIST-defined PFS may not be the proper endpoint to define progression for immunotherapies. Further evaluation of the association of TTD and other immune-related progression endpoints with overall survival is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01668784.

scholarly journals Monotherapy versus combination therapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A single center study

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-337
Author(s):  
Wishyar Al-Bazzaz ◽  
Omar Alkhayat ◽  
Ali AlKhayat
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Once Daily

Background and objectives: Most benign prostatic hyperplasia patients do not present obvious indicators for surgical intervention, so most of these patients are treated initially with medical therapy. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute urinary retention after treatment with monotherapy with the incidence after combination therapy and determine the need for surgery in both methods. Methods: This is a retrospective study of the medical records of 248 benign prostatic hyperplasia patients who had attended Rizgary Teaching Hospital from May 2012 to June 2017. These patients were divided into two groups of 138 and 110 patients who have been treated by 0.4 mg tamsulosin capsule once daily and 0.4 mg tamsulosin capsule plus 5mg finasteride tablet once daily, respectively. Benign prostatic hyperplasia outcomes (acute urinary retention, benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery) were compared between these two groups according to prostate volume and serum prostate specific antigen. Results: The combined treatment had significantly reduced the incidence of acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery than monotherapy (P = 0.006 and 0.044, respectively). Similarly, when prostate volume and prostate specific antigen were above the cutoff value, both acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery were lower in the combination therapy group than the monotherapy group. Conclusion: Combined therapy (0.4 mg tamsulosin plus 5mg finasteride) was significantly superior to 0.4 mg tamsulosin alone in the reduction of the incidence of acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery among benign prostatic hyperplasia patients. Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Acute urinary retention; Benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery; Prostate volume; Prostate specific antigen.

Prognostic factors for patients with Ewing sarcoma (EWS) at first recurrence

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10011-10011
Author(s):  
P. Leavey ◽  
L. Mascarenhas ◽  
N. Marina ◽  
Z. Chen ◽  
M. Krailo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Recurrence

10011 Background: The prognosis for patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is very poor with 5-year survival of 13%. Since 30–40% of patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic EWS develop recurrence, the Children's Oncology Group (COG) sought to evaluate prognostic factors for these patients. Data was derived from the phase III, multi-institutional study INT 0091. Methods: Between 1988 and 1994, five hundred and seventy-eight eligible patients with previously untreated EWS or PNET of bone were enrolled on INT 0091. Patients who experienced recurrence or disease progression as their first analytic event were considered. Survival was calculated from date of disease progression to death or last patient contact. Comparisons of the risk for death across groups were accomplished using the log-rank test. Survivor functions were estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. Results: Two hundred and sixty-two patients experienced disease progression or recurrence. The median time to first recurrence was 1.3 years (range 0–7.4 years) for all patients, 1.4 years (range 0 to 7.4 years) for patients with initially localized disease and 1 year (range 0 to 6 years) for patients with initially metastatic disease. Time to first recurrence from date of initial diagnosis was a predictor of post-recurrence survival (p<0.0001). Twenty-one percent of patients whose disease recurred or progressed experienced first recurrence 2 or more years from initial diagnosis and had an estimated 5 year post-recurrence survival of 30%. This compares with 7% for those whose first recurrence or progression was earlier. No statistical difference was detected when patients whose disease recurred < 12 months were compared with those whose recurrence was 12–24 months from initial diagnosis. Significant risk factors for death after recurrence included metastatic disease at initial diagnosis, elevated LDH at initial diagnosis and female gender. In patients non-metastatic at initial diagnosis pelvic primary site was also a risk factor for death after recurrence. Conclusions: Patients with longer time to first recurrence represent the subset of patients most likely to survive following recurrence. All patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma would benefit from collaborative trials to investigate new therapeutic options. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

RAINBOW: A global, phase III, randomized, double-blind study of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric adenocarcinoma following disease progression on first-line platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-containing combination therapy rainbow IMCL CP12-0922 (I4T-IE-JVBE).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA7-LBA7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansjochen Wilke ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Sang Cheul Oh ◽  
Gyorgy Bodoky ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind

LBA7 Background: RAM is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody VEGF-receptor 2 antagonist. We conducted a global, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PTX +/- RAM in patients with metastatic GEJ or gastric adenocarcinoma who had disease progression on or within 4 months after first-line platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based combination therapy. Methods: Pts received RAM (8 mg/kg IV q2w) or placebo (PL) plus PTX (80 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 of a 4 week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Eligible pts had ECOG PS ≤ 1; and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and safety. Results: From Dec 2010 to Sep 2012, 665 pts were randomized (RAM+PTX: 330; PTX: 335). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. The OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.807 (95% CI 0.678, 0.962; p=0.0169). Median OS was 9.63m for RAM+PTX and 7.36m for PTX. The HR for PFS was 0.635 (95% CI 0.536, 0.752; p <0.0001). Median PFS was 4.40m and 2.86m. Median TTP was 5.5m RAM+PTX; 3.0m PTX (p <0.0001). ORR was 28% RAM+PTX;16% PTX (p=0.0001). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) occurring in >5% of patients on RAM+PTX were: neutropenia (40.7% RAM+PTX;18.8% PTX), leukopenia (17.4% vs 6.7% ), hypertension (14.1% vs 2.4%), anemia (9.2% vs 10.3%), fatigue (7.0% vs 4.0%), abdominal pain (5.5% vs 3.3%), and asthenia (5.5% vs 3.3%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 3.1% RAM+PTX; 2.4% PTX. Conclusions: The primary endpoint of improved OS was met. A statistically significant and clinically meaningful OS benefit of > 2 months was observed for RAM+PTX vs. PTX in gastric and GEJ cancer after progression on 1st-line therapy, as were significant benefits in PFS and ORR. Neutropenia was more frequently reported in the RAM+PTX arm but incidence of febrile neutropenia was comparable between arms. Clinical trial information: NCT01170663.

Phase III trial comparing antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SAR408701 with docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ NSCLC) failing chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9625-TPS9625
Author(s):  
Melissa Lynne Johnson ◽  
Mustapha Chadjaa ◽  
Semra Yoruk ◽  
Benjamin Besse
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cell Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Eortc Qlq

TPS9625 Background: Despite recent advances in the treatment of NSQ NSCLC, including the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) into first-line treatment of all patients, novel therapies are necessary at disease progression. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5), a cell-surface glycoprotein, is overexpressed in several tumor types, including NSQ NSCLC; ~20% of patients express high CEACAM5 levels. SAR408701 is an ADC combining a humanized antibody targeting CEACAM5 with the potent cytotoxic maytansinoid derivative DM4 and is expected to selectively deliver DM4 to CEACAM5-expressing cancer cells. In an interim analysis of a first-in-human study (NCT02187848) in patients with NSQ NSCLC and CEACAM5 expression in ≥50% of tumor cells, SAR408701 administered 100 mg/m² every 2 weeks showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 23% and a favorable safety profile (Gazzah A et al J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:15, 9072). Methods: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients receive either SAR408701 100 mg/m² IV every 2 weeks or the standard of care treatment docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks. Randomization is stratified on ECOG performance status (PS), previous ICI treatment (sequential vs combination), and geographical region. Patients are ≥18 years with metastatic NSQ NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI treatment (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody), express CEACAM5 in ≥50% of tumor cells at ≥2+ intensity (central testing), and have ECOG PS 0–1. Exclusion criteria include untreated brain metastases, history of corneal disorders, and prior treatment with docetaxel, maytansinoid derivatives, or CEACAM5-targeting drugs. Tumor imaging occurs at baseline and every 8 weeks until disease progression. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST v1.1 by independent blinded review committee) and overall survival (OS), both analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, stratified log-rank test, and stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Study success is defined either on PFS or OS, with a strong type-I error control for multiple hypotheses. Secondary endpoints are ORR and duration of response (RECIST v1.1), health related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13), and safety (adverse events graded by NCI CTCAE v5). Approximately 554 randomized patients (277 per arm) is adequate to reach both PFS and OS events. The study opened in Nov 2019, and as of Feb 7, 2020, 20 sites in 8 countries are activated. Clinical trial information: NCT04154956 .

A phase III trial of tumor-treating fields with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for front-line treatment of locally-advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC): PANOVA-3.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS448-TPS448
Author(s):  
Vincent J. Picozzi ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Carlos Roberto Becerra ◽  
Tomislav Dragovich
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Local Disease

TPS448 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma. TTFields at specific frequency (150-200 kHz) are delivered via transducer arrays placed on the skin in proximity to the tumor site. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. The phase 2 PANOVA study, the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients, demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields when combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in both metastatic and LAPC. The Phase 3 PANOVA-3 trial (NCT03377491) is designed to test the efficacy and safety of adding TTFields to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in LAPC. Methods: Patients (N = 556) with unresectable, LAPC (per NCCN guidelines) will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Patients should have an ECOG score of 0-2 and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be stratified based on their performance status and geographical region, and will be randomized 1:1 to TTFields plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone. Chemotherapy will be administered at standard dose of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly). TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered at least 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria V1.1. Follow up will be performed q8w, including a CT scan of the chest and abdomen. Following local disease progression, patients will be followed monthly for survival. Overall survival will be the primary endpoint and progression-free survival, objective response rate, rate of resectability, quality of life and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using a log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus chemotherapy with control patients on chemotherapy alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio 0.75 in overall survival. Type I error is set to 0.05 (two-sided) and power to 80%. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document