Phase III trial comparing antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SAR408701 with docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ NSCLC) failing chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9625-TPS9625
Author(s):  
Melissa Lynne Johnson ◽  
Mustapha Chadjaa ◽  
Semra Yoruk ◽  
Benjamin Besse
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cell Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Eortc Qlq

TPS9625 Background: Despite recent advances in the treatment of NSQ NSCLC, including the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) into first-line treatment of all patients, novel therapies are necessary at disease progression. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5), a cell-surface glycoprotein, is overexpressed in several tumor types, including NSQ NSCLC; ~20% of patients express high CEACAM5 levels. SAR408701 is an ADC combining a humanized antibody targeting CEACAM5 with the potent cytotoxic maytansinoid derivative DM4 and is expected to selectively deliver DM4 to CEACAM5-expressing cancer cells. In an interim analysis of a first-in-human study (NCT02187848) in patients with NSQ NSCLC and CEACAM5 expression in ≥50% of tumor cells, SAR408701 administered 100 mg/m² every 2 weeks showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 23% and a favorable safety profile (Gazzah A et al J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:15, 9072). Methods: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients receive either SAR408701 100 mg/m² IV every 2 weeks or the standard of care treatment docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks. Randomization is stratified on ECOG performance status (PS), previous ICI treatment (sequential vs combination), and geographical region. Patients are ≥18 years with metastatic NSQ NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI treatment (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody), express CEACAM5 in ≥50% of tumor cells at ≥2+ intensity (central testing), and have ECOG PS 0–1. Exclusion criteria include untreated brain metastases, history of corneal disorders, and prior treatment with docetaxel, maytansinoid derivatives, or CEACAM5-targeting drugs. Tumor imaging occurs at baseline and every 8 weeks until disease progression. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST v1.1 by independent blinded review committee) and overall survival (OS), both analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, stratified log-rank test, and stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Study success is defined either on PFS or OS, with a strong type-I error control for multiple hypotheses. Secondary endpoints are ORR and duration of response (RECIST v1.1), health related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13), and safety (adverse events graded by NCI CTCAE v5). Approximately 554 randomized patients (277 per arm) is adequate to reach both PFS and OS events. The study opened in Nov 2019, and as of Feb 7, 2020, 20 sites in 8 countries are activated. Clinical trial information: NCT04154956 .

A phase III trial of tumor-treating fields with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for front-line treatment of locally-advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC): PANOVA-3.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS448-TPS448
Author(s):  
Vincent J. Picozzi ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Carlos Roberto Becerra ◽  
Tomislav Dragovich
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Local Disease

TPS448 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma. TTFields at specific frequency (150-200 kHz) are delivered via transducer arrays placed on the skin in proximity to the tumor site. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. The phase 2 PANOVA study, the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients, demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields when combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in both metastatic and LAPC. The Phase 3 PANOVA-3 trial (NCT03377491) is designed to test the efficacy and safety of adding TTFields to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in LAPC. Methods: Patients (N = 556) with unresectable, LAPC (per NCCN guidelines) will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Patients should have an ECOG score of 0-2 and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be stratified based on their performance status and geographical region, and will be randomized 1:1 to TTFields plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone. Chemotherapy will be administered at standard dose of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly). TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered at least 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria V1.1. Follow up will be performed q8w, including a CT scan of the chest and abdomen. Following local disease progression, patients will be followed monthly for survival. Overall survival will be the primary endpoint and progression-free survival, objective response rate, rate of resectability, quality of life and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using a log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus chemotherapy with control patients on chemotherapy alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio 0.75 in overall survival. Type I error is set to 0.05 (two-sided) and power to 80%. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

PANOVA-3: A phase III study of tumor treating fields with nabpaclitaxel and gemcitabine for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS469-TPS469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uri Weinberg ◽  
Moshe Giladi ◽  
Zeev Bomzon ◽  
Eilon David Kirson
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Local Disease

TPS469 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma by the FDA. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. The Phase 2 PANOVA study was the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients, and demonstrated the safety of TTFields when combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in both metastatic and LAPC. The Phase 3 PANOVA-3 trial (NCT03377491) is designed to test the efficacy of adding TTFields to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in LAPC. Methods: Patients (N = 556) with unresectable, LAPC (per NCCN guidelines) will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Patients should have an ECOG score of 0-2 and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be stratified based on their performance status and geographical region, and will be randomized 1:1 to TTFields plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone. Chemotherapy will be administered at standard dose of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly). TTFields (150kHz) will be deilvered at least 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria V1.1. Follow up will be performed q8w, including a CT scan of the chest and abdomen. Following local disease progression, patients will be followed monthly for survival. Overall survival will be the primary endpoint and progression-free survival, objective response rate, rate of resectability, quality of life and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using a log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus chemotherapy with control patients on chemotherapy alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio 0.75 in overall survival. Type I error is set to 0.05 (two-sided) and power to 80%. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

PANOVA-3: A phase III study of tumor treating fields with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS792-TPS792
Author(s):  
Vincent J. Picozzi ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Carlos Roberto Becerra ◽  
Tomislav Dragovich
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Local Disease

TPS792 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma. TTFields at specific frequency (150-200 kHz) are delivered via transducer arrays placed on the skin in proximity to the tumor site. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. The Phase 2 PANOVA study, the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients, demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields when combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in both metastatic and LAPC. The Phase 3 PANOVA-3 trial (NCT03377491) is designed to test the efficacy and safety of adding TTFields to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in LAPC. Methods: Patients (N = 556) with unresectable, LAPC (per NCCN guidelines) will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Patients should have an ECOG score of 0-2 and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be stratified based on their performance status and geographical region, and will be randomized 1:1 to TTFields plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone. Chemotherapy will be administered at standard dose of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly). TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered at least 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria V1.1. Follow up will be performed q8w, including a CT scan of the chest and abdomen. Following local disease progression, patients will be followed monthly for survival. Overall survival will be the primary endpoint and progression-free survival, objective response rate, rate of resectability, quality of life and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using a log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus chemotherapy with control patients on chemotherapy alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio 0.75 in overall survival. Type I error is set to 0.05 (two-sided) and power to 80%. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of cisplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine with or without ramucirumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (RAINFALL, NCT02314117).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS178-TPS178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
David H. Ilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Type I ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind

TPS178 Background: Ramucirumab, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed to the ectodomain of VEGFR-2, prevents ligand binding to the receptor, blocking activation of downstream receptor-mediated pathways. Ramucirumab has demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 2 phase III registration studies (REGARD, RAINBOW) in patients in second-line treatment of gastric cancer. This global phase III trial will compare PFS in patients with HER2-negative, metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma receiving ramucirumab with cisplatin/capecitabine (or 5-FU) versus placebo with cisplatin/capecitabine (or 5-FU) as first-line treatment. The trial is conducted in 137 sites in the Americas, Europe and Japan and is currently open to enrollment. Methods: Eligible patients will be randomized to receive ramucirumab (8mg/kg on days 1 and 8, based upon population pharmacokinetic modelling) or placebo with cisplatin/capecitabine every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria are met. The primary endpoint is PFS; OS is the key secondary endpoint. Efficacy will be considered at 3 analysis points: futility analysis for PFS, primary analysis of PFS & final analysis of OS. A gatekeeping strategy will be used to assess PFS and OS. The OS endpoint will only be tested if the PFS test is significant to control Type I error at 5% across both endpoints. An exposure/safety analysis will be done after 60 patients have started the 3rd cycle. The study has 90% power to demonstrate a PFS advantage assuming HR = 0.70 and 80% power to demonstrate an OS advantage assuming HR = 0.77. Other secondary endpoints include PFS2 (the time from randomization to disease progression after the start of additional systemic anticancer treatment, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first), objective response rate, safety and quality of life. As of 9/11/2015, 128 patients have been enrolled in 19 countries. The 1st exposure/safety analysis is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02314117.

EV-301: Phase III study to evaluate enfortumab vedotin (EV) versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS497-TPS497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Jonathan E. Rosenberg ◽  
Ignacio Duran ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS497 Background: Standard first-line treatment for patients (pts) with la/mUC is cisplatin-based chemotherapy or carboplatin-based chemotherapy for pts unfit for cisplatin. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are standard treatment options for pts who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. While some pts with la/mUC achieve durable responses with CPIs, less than 25% of pts respond. Following failure of a CPI, no therapies are approved. Enfortumab vedotin is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E to tumors expressing Nectin-4, which is expressed in 97% of mUC pt samples (Petrylak et al. ASCO, 2017). In a phase 1 study (EV-101; NCT02091999), single-agent EV 1.25 mg/kg was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 42% across the overall population of pts with mUC; in pts with prior CPI therapy or liver metastasis at baseline confirmed ORRs of 42% and 36% were observed. A pivotal phase 2 study of EV in la/mUC pts with prior CPI treatment (EV-201; NCT03219333) is ongoing. Methods: EV-301 is a global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial (NCT03474107) enrolling adult pts with la/mUC and an ECOG performance status score ≤1, who have received a prior platinum-containing chemotherapy, and have experienced disease progression during or following treatment with a CPI. Approximately 550 pts will be randomized (1:1) to receive EV (1.25 mg/kg) administered by IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle ( Arm A), or investigator choice of IV docetaxel, paclitaxel, or vinflunine (EU only) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle ( Arm B). Treatment with the study drug will continue until radiological disease progression, intolerance, or other discontinuation criterion is met. Radiological assessments of tumor response status will be performed at baseline and every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival; secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall response rate, as well as assessment of safety/tolerability, and quality-of-life parameters. Clinical trial information: NCT02091999.

Cetuximab metastatic colorectal cancer strategy (ERMES) study: A phase III randomized two arm study with FOLFIRI + cetuximab until disease progression compared to FOLFIRI + cetuximab for 8 cycles followed by cetuximab alone until disease progression in first-line treatment of patients with RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS810-TPS810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmine Pinto ◽  
Nicola Normanno ◽  
Armando Orlandi ◽  
Evaristo Maiello ◽  
Domenico Bilancia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
First Line Treatment

TPS810 Background: The optimal duration and content of first-line therapy in mCRC pts once they have achieved objective response is controversial. In the FIRE-3 trial, ETS was significantly associated with PFS and OS. Based on this evidence it can be hypothesized that once this goal has been achieved, further exposure to combined antineoplastic treatment may not result in improvement or preservation of such result but only in an increase of toxicity. We designed a strategy study to compare FOLFIRI + cetuximab until PD to FOLFIRI + cetuximab for 8 cycles followed by cetuximab alone until PD in first line treatment of RAS/BRAF WT mCRC pts. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial. Untreated and unresecteble RAS/BRAF WT mCRC pts were randomized 1:1 to receive Cetuximab (400 mg/mq w1 and then 250 mg/mq weekly) + FOLFIRI until PD (standard arm) or Cetuximab (400 mg/mq week 1 and then 250 mg/mq weekly) + FOLFIRI for 8 cycles followed by Cetuximab monotherapy until PD (experimental arm). Tumor assessment is planned every 8 weeks. The objective of the study is to demonstrate a not inferior efficacy and a better toxicity profile for the experimental treatment compared to the standard treatment. The co-primary endpoints are PFS and incidence of G 3-4 AEs. Secondary endpoints are OS, ORR, ETS (8 weeks) and safety. A prospective multiple gene mutation analysis by NGS of both tumor tissue and blood will be performed to find potential predictive factors and surrogate markers of treatment efficacy. The two co-primary endpoints will be compared between the two arms using a fixed-sequence testing procedure to control for the family-wise type I error rate of 0.05 in a strong sense. This sequence considers that a reduction of grade 3-4 AEs is only of relevance, if non-inferiority is shown regarding PFS. 600 evaluable pts will be enrolled and randomized. Study recruitment started on January 2015, currently 139 pts have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT02484833.

scholarly journals NCOG-02. PROGNOSTIC VALIDATION OF THE EANO ESMO CLASSIFICATION OF LEPTOMENINGEAL METASTASIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii129-ii129
Author(s):  
Emilie Le Rhun ◽  
Patrick Devos ◽  
Johannes Weller ◽  
Katharina Seystahl ◽  
Francesca Mo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Leptomeningeal Metastasis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor ◽  
Choice Of Treatment

Abstract BACKGROUND The EANO ESMO guidelines have proposed a classification of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) based on clinical (typical/atypical), cytological (positive/negative/equivocal) and MRI (A linear, B nodular, C linear and nodular, D normal or hydrocephalus only) presentation. Type I LM is defined by the presence of tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (confirmed LM) whereas type II LM is defined by typical clinical and MRI signs (probable or possible LM). Here we explored the clinical utility of these EANO ESMO LM subtypes for choice of treatment and outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively assembled data from 254 patients with newly diagnosed LM from different solid tumors, including as main primary tumors breast cancer (n=98, 45%), lung cancer (n=65, 25.5%) and melanoma (n=51, 13.5%). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank test. RESULTS Median age at LM diagnosis was 56.5 years (range 20-82 years). Typical clinical LM symptoms or signs were noted in 225 patients (88.5%); only 13 patients (5%) were clinically asymptomatic. The most common MRI subtype was A seen in 117 patients (46%). Types B (n=33, 13%), C (n=54, 21%) and D (n=50, 19.5%) were less common. Tumor cells in the CSF were observed in 186 patients (73%) whereas the CSF was equivocal in 24 (9.5%) and negative in 44 (17.5%) patients. Patients with confirmed LM had inferior outcome than patients with probable or possible LM (p=0.0063). Type I patients had inferior outcome than type II patients (p=0.0019). Nodular disease was a negative prognostic factor in type II LM, but not in type I LM (p=0.0138). CONCLUSION The EANO ESMO LM subtypes are highly prognostic and should be considered for stratification and overall design of clinical trials.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2354-2362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank V. Fossella ◽  
Russell DeVore ◽  
Ronald N. Kerr ◽  
Jeffrey Crawford ◽  
Ronald R. Natale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: To confirm the promising phase II results of docetaxel monotherapy, this phase III trial was conducted of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously failed platinum-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 373 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (D100) or 75 mg/m2 (D75) versus a control regimen of vinorelbine or ifosfamide (V/I). The three treatment groups were well-balanced for key patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall response rates were 10.8% with D100 and 6.7% with D75, each significantly higher than the 0.8% response with V/I (P = .001 and P = .036, respectively). Patients who received docetaxel had a longer time to progression (P = .046, by log-rank test) and a greater progression-free survival at 26 weeks (P = .005, by χ2 test). Although overall survival was not significantly different between the three groups, the 1-year survival was significantly greater with D75 than with the control treatment (32% v 19%; P = .025, by χ2 test). Prior exposure to paclitaxel did not decrease the likelihood of response to docetaxel, nor did it impact survival. There was a trend toward greater efficacy in patients whose disease was platinum-resistant rather than platinum-refractory and in patients with performance status of 0 or 1 versus 2. Toxicity was greatest with D100, but the D75 arm was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: This first randomized trial in this setting demonstrates that D75 every 3 weeks can offer clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced NSCLC whose disease has relapsed or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Impact of early vs. delayed initiation of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery in LUTS/BPH patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms at risk of disease progression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore D’Agate ◽  
Chandrashekhar Chavan ◽  
Michael Manyak ◽  
Juan Manuel Palacios-Moreno ◽  
Matthias Oelke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Risk Of Disease

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the effect of delayed start of combination therapy (CT) with dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg on the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery (AUR/S) in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at risk of disease progression. Methods Using a time-to-event model based on pooled data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials, clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed to assess the risk of AUR/S up to 48 months in moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH patients following immediate and delayed start of CT for those not responding to tamsulosin monotherapy. Simulation scenarios (1300 subjects/arm) were investigated, including immediate start (reference) and alternative delayed start (six scenarios 1–24 months). AUR/S incidence was described by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and analysed using log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events as well as the relative and attributable risks were summarised stratified by treatment. Results Survival curves for patients starting CT at month 1 and 3 did not differ from those who initiated CT immediately. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed when switch to CT occurs ≥ 6 months from the initial treatment. At month 48, AUR/S incidence was 4.6% vs 9.5%, 11.0% and 11.3% in patients receiving immediate CT vs. switchers after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions Start of CT before month 6 appears to significantly reduce the risk of AUR/S compared with delayed start by ≥ 6 months. This has implications for the treatment algorithm for men with LUTS/BPH at risk of disease progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document