scholarly journals Open versus arthroscopic release for lateral patellar compression syndrome: a randomized-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherwan A. Hamawandi ◽  
Hazhar I. Amin ◽  
Ameer Kadhim Al-Humairi
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lateral Release ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Release ◽  
Compression Syndrome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome

Abstract Introduction Lateral patellar compression syndrome is one of the causes of anterior knee pain in young adults and resulted from tight lateral patellar retinaculum. The aim of our study is to compare between open and arthroscopic release of lateral patellar compression syndrome in relation of functional outcome, time of surgical procedure, length of hospital stays, intraoperative and postoperative complications as bleeding, infection, recurrence, and patellar instability with 2 years of follow-up. Materials and methods 80 patients, age (21–49 years), were divided randomly into 2 groups (A and B). Group A (40 patients) were treated with open release. Group B (40 patients) were treated by arthroscopic release. All these patients are diagnosed as lateral patellar compression syndrome depending on clinical features and MRI. All patients were assessed by Lysholm knee scoring scale before surgery and at periods of 2, 6 weeks, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Results There is significant difference in functional outcome, measured by Lysholm knee scoring scale, between preoperative and postoperative assessment periods in both groups (P < 0.001). There is significantly better functional outcome at 2 years of follow-up with arthroscopic release (P = 0.018). There is no recurrence in both groups, but there were 4 patients develop medial patellar instability in the group of open release. Conclusion Both open and arthroscopic lateral release for patients with isolated lateral patellar compression syndrome can be effective surgical procedures, but arthroscopic release can achieve better functional outcome. Trial registration: NCT, NCT04130412. Retrospectively registered on 3rd of June, 2020 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Open Versus Arthroscopic Release for Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherwan Hamawandi ◽  
Hazhar Amin ◽  
Ameer Kadhim Al-Humairi
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Release ◽  
Compression Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Arthroscopy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome ◽  
Surgical Release

Abstract Background: Lateral patellar compression syndrome is one of the causes of anterior knee pain in young adults and resulted from tight lateral patellar retinaculum, which can be treated by surgical release of tight retinaculum after failure of conservative measures. Surgical release can be done by open or arthroscopic procedures. There was no randomized control trial to compare between these two procedures in considering of functional outcome and complications. The aim of our study is to compare between open and arthroscopic release of lateral patellar compression syndrome in relation of functional outcome, time of surgical procedure, length of hospital stays, intraoperative and postoperative complications as bleeding, infection, recurrence and patellar instability with 2 years of follow up. Methods: 80 patients, age (21-49 years), were divided randomly into 2 groups (A and B). Group A (40 patients) were treated with open release after diagnostic arthroscopy. Group B (40 patients) were treated by arthroscopic release. All these patients are diagnosed as lateral patellar compression syndrome depending on clinical features, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy and they had failure of conservative measures of quadriceps strengthening and analgesics for 6 months. All patients were assessed by Lysholm knee scoring scale before surgery and at periods of 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Results: There is significant difference in functional outcome, measured by Lysholm knee scoring scale, between preoperative and postoperative assessment periods in both groups (P<0.001). There is significantly better functional outcome at 2 years of follow up with the arthroscopic release (P=0.018). There is no recurrence in both groups, but there were 4 patients develop medial patellar instability in the group that was treated by open release. There are 2 patients develop hemarthrosis in arthroscopic group and one patient develop superficial wound infection in the group of open release. There is no significant difference in the postoperative complications between two groups. Conclusion: Both open and arthroscopic lateral release for patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome (without instability, limb malalignment or dysplasia) are effective surgical procedures but arthroscopic release can achieve better functional outcome than open release with less risk of development of post-operative patellar instability.Trial registration: NCT, NCT04130412. Registered 15 October 2019 -Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT04130412

scholarly journals Open Versus Arthroscopic Release for Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome: A Randomized Control Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherwan Hamawandi ◽  
Hazhar Amin ◽  
Ameer Kadhim Al-Humairi
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Release ◽  
Compression Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Arthroscopy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome

Abstract Background: Lateral patellar compression syndrome is one of the causes of anterior knee pain in young adults and resulted from tight lateral patellar retinaculum, which can be treated by surgical release of tight retinaculum after failure of conservative measures. Surgical release can be done by open or arthroscopic procedures. There was no randomized control trial to compare between these two procedures in considering of functional outcome and complications. The aim of our study is to compare between open and arthroscopic release of lateral patellar compression syndrome in relation of functional outcome, time of surgical procedure, length of hospital stays, intraoperative and postoperative complications as bleeding, infection, recurrence and patellar instability with 2 years of follow up. Methods: 80 patients, age (21-49 years), were divided randomly into 2 groups (A and B). Group A (40 patients) were treated with open release after diagnostic arthroscopy. Group B (40 patients) were treated by arthroscopic release. All these patients are diagnosed as lateral patellar compression syndrome depending on clinical features, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy and they had failure of conservative measures of quadriceps strengthening and analgesics for 6 months. All patients were assessed by Lysholm knee scoring scale before surgery and at periods of 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery.Results: There is significant difference in functional outcome, measured by Lysholm knee scoring scale, between preoperative and postoperative assessment periods in both groups (P<0.001). There is significantly better functional outcome at 2 years of follow up with the arthroscopic release (P=0.018). There is no recurrence in both groups, but there were 4 patients develop medial patellar instability in the group that was treated by open release. There are 2 patients develop hemarthrosis in arthroscopic group and one patient develop superficial wound infection in the group of open release. There is no significant difference in the postoperative complications between two groups.Conclusion: Both open and arthroscopic lateral release for patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome (without instability, limb malalignment or dysplasia) are effective surgical procedures but arthroscopic release can achieve better functional outcome than open release with less risk of development of post-operative patellar instability.Trial registration: NCT, NCT04130412. Registered 15 October 2019 -Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT04130412

scholarly journals Use of hyaluronic acid injection after arthroscopic release in lateral patellar compression syndrome with degenerative cartilage changes: randomized control trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherwan A. Hamawandi
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Lateral Release ◽  
Arthroscopic Release ◽  
Compression Syndrome ◽  
Kujala Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome ◽  
Degenerative Cartilage

Abstract Background Degenerative cartilage changes can be seen, in cases of lateral patellar compression syndrome, involving the patellofemoral joint. Hyaluronic acid is a natural component of the synovial fluid and responsible for its elastic features and function of articular surfaces. The aim of this study is to show the effect of intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid, after arthroscopic lateral release in lateral patellar compression syndrome, on the functional outcome and knee pain in those patients with degenerative cartilage changes. Method Ninety patients age (30–50) years with lateral patellar compression syndrome and degenerative cartilage changes were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group A was treated by arthroscopic lateral release and received intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid 2 weeks after surgery. Group B was treated by arthroscopic lateral release only. Both groups were assessed by Kujala score and visual analogue scale for knee pain preoperatively and re-assessed postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Results There was significant improvement in Kujala score and Visual analogue scale post-operatively in both groups (P-value< 0.001) with better improvement in Kujala score in group A after intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid up to 2 year of follow up (P-value = 0.006) as well as better improvement in visual analogue score at 6 months post-operatively (P-value = 0.035). Conclusion Intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid after arthroscopic release, in patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome and degenerative cartilage changes, can result in better improvement of knee pain and functional outcome up to 2 years of follow up. Trial registration NCT, NCT04134611. Registered 18 October 2019 -Retrospectively registered.

scholarly journals Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the functional outcome of olecranon osteotomy versus triceps tongue elevation for surgical exposure of distal humerus in adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 134-139
Author(s):  
Asish Rajak ◽  
Rajiv Maharjan ◽  
Bikram Prasad Shrestha ◽  
Pashupati Chaudhary ◽  
Rosan PS Kalawar
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Distal Humerus ◽  
Mature Adult ◽  
Demographic Profiles ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomized Control

Background: Fractures of the distal end of the humerus are difficult to treat. The goal of treatment is to achieve a stable, painless elbow with early adequate range of motion. They are operated mainly by posterior approach among which olecranon osteotomy (bony component violation) and triceps tongue elevation (soft tissue component breach) were used in this study. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare olecranon osteotomy and triceps tongue elevation in terms of functional outcome (Mayo elbow performance index), rates of complications and others. Methodology: A randomized control trial was conducted including 39 eligible adults (20 in triceps tongue elevation and 19 in olecranon osteotomy group) presenting to B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences during the study period of 12 months duration. All skeletally mature adult patients with isolated traumatic closed intra-articular or distal end fracture of humerus without distal neurovascular deficit were included. Patients with polytrauma, refractures, compartment syndrome and patient not giving consent were excluded from the study. They were operated and followed up at 2, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. Results: The demographic profiles of the two groups were comparable. There was significant difference between the intraoperative time between the two groups (p=0.009). At final follow up, there were no significant differences in functional outcome and complications. Conclusion: The approaches are comparable in terms of union, post-operative function and complications. There was increased intraoperative time in the olecranon osteotomy approach suggesting that patients who cannot tolerate longer intraoperative time may benefit from triceps tongue elevation approach. 

scholarly journals Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711877427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Kumar ◽  
Tracey P. Bastrom ◽  
M. Morgan Dennis ◽  
Andrew T. Pennock ◽  
Eric W. Edmonds
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Release ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Recurrent patellar instability is commonly treated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), and the use of allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has demonstrated inferior outcomes. Purpose: To compare the outcomes of allografts versus autografts in adolescent MPFLR for patellar instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed on patients younger than 18 years who underwent MPFLR for recurrent instability after failed nonoperative management over an 8-year period with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into autograft or allograft hamstring cohorts for comparison. Primary outcome measures were return to normal activity, incidence of redislocation/subluxation, pain, stiffness, other complications, and Kujala scores. Statistical analysis using unpaired t tests was performed, with an alpha value set at P < .05. Results: After criteria were applied, 59 adolescents (36 allograft, 23 autograft; 38 girls, 21 boys) with a mean ± SD age of 15.2 ± 1.7 years and a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 1.9 years (allograft, 3.3 ± 1.1 years; autograft, 5.7 ± 2.1 years; P ≤ .001) were included. Seven patients had concurrent osteotomies (3 allograft, 4 autograft), 11 patients had concurrent loose body removals (5 allograft, 6 autograft), and 9 patients had concurrent lateral release (7 allograft, 2 autograft). Between groups, no significant difference was found in change between preoperative and most recent follow-up (mean, 1.2 ± 2.1) or rate of return to sports (mean, 73.3%). In total, 9 surgeries failed (3 allograft, 6 autograft). For the surviving grafts, a statistical difference in mean Kujala scores at final follow-up was noted (allograft, 92.7; autograft, 97.4; P = .02). Conclusion: We identified no significant differences in return to activity, pain score changes, and incidences of failure between patients undergoing MPFLR with allograft versus autograft. Although teenagers with surviving autograft MPFLR reported statistically higher Kujala scores, the mean score difference of 5 points was not clinically significant. It appears that using allograft tendon instead of autograft tissue for MPFLR in this teenage population does not adversely affect long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Use of Hyaluronic Acid Injection after Arthroscopic Release in Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome with Degenerative Cartilage Changes: Randomized Control Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherwan Hamawandi
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Lateral Release ◽  
P Value ◽  
Compression Syndrome ◽  
Kujala Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome ◽  
Degenerative Cartilage

Abstract BackgroundDegenerative cartilage changes can be seen, in cases of lateral patellar compression syndrome, involving the patellofemoral joint. Hyaluronic acid is a natural component of the synovial fluid and responsible for its elastic features and function of articular surfaces. The aim of this study is to show the effect of intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid, after arthroscopic lateral release in lateral patellar compression syndrome, on the functional outcome and knee pain in those patients with degenerative cartilage changes. MethodNinety patients age (30-50) years with lateral patellar compression syndrome and degenerative cartilage changes were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group A was treated by arthroscopic lateral release and received intrarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid 2 weeks after surgery. Group B was treated by arthroscopic lateral release only. Both groups were assessed by Kujala score and visual analogue scale for knee pain preoperatively and re-assessed postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months.ResultsThere was significant improvement in Kujala score and Visual analogue scale post-operatively in both groups (P-value<0.001) with better improvement in Kujala score in group A after intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid up to 2 year of follow up (P-value=0.006) as well as better improvement in visual analogue score at 6 months post-operatively (P-value=0.035)ConclusionIntra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid after arthroscopic release, in patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome and degenerative cartilage changes, can result in better improvement of knee pain and functional outcome up to 2 years of follow up.Trial registration: NCT, NCT04134611. Registered 18 October 2019 -Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT04134611

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Trial of the Clinical Recovery and Biodegradation of Polylactide-co-glycolide Implants Used in the Intramedullary Nailing of Children’s Forearm Shaft Fractures with at Least Four Years of Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 995
Author(s):  
Marja Perhomaa ◽  
Tytti Pokka ◽  
Linda Korhonen ◽  
Antti Kyrö ◽  
Jaakko Niinimäki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Intramedullary Nails ◽  
Metal Implants ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Significant Difference

The preferred surgical fixation of forearm shaft fractures in children is Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN). Due to known disadvantageous effects of metal implants, a new surgical method using biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) intramedullary nails has been developed but its long-term outcomes are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of Biodegradable Intramedullary Nailing (BIN) to ESIN and assess the biodegradation of the study implants via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The study population of the prospective, randomized trial consisted of paediatric patients whose forearm shaft fractures were treated with BIN (n = 19) or ESIN (n = 16). Forearm rotation at minimally four years’ follow-up was the main outcome. There was no clinically significant difference in the recovery of the patients treated with the BIN as compared to those treated with the ESIN. More than half of the implants (57.7%, n = 15/26) were completely degraded, and the rest were degraded almost completely. The PLGA intramedullary nails used in the treatment of forearm shaft fractures in this study resulted in good function and anatomy. No unexpected disadvantages were found in the degradation of the implants. However, two implant failures had occurred in three months postoperatively.

Capsular closure versus unrepaired interportal capsulotomy after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, results of a patient-blinded randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110057
Author(s):  
Niels H Bech ◽  
Inger N Sierevelt ◽  
Sheryl de Waard ◽  
Boudijn S H Joling ◽  
Gino M M J Kerkhoffs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Hip capsular management after hip arthroscopy remains a topic of debate. Most available current literature is of poor quality and are retrospective or cohort studies. As of today, no clear consensus exists on capsular management after hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of routine capsular closure versus unrepaired capsulotomy after interportal capsulotomy measured with NRS pain and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). Materials and methods: All eligible patients with femoroacetabular impingement who opt for hip arthroscopy ( n = 116) were randomly assigned to one of both treatment groups and were operated by a single surgeon. Postoperative pain was measured with the NRS score weekly the first 12 weeks after surgery. The HAGOS questionnaire was measured at 12 and 52 weeks postoperatively. Results: Baseline characteristics and operation details were comparable between treatment groups. Regarding the NRS pain no significant difference was found between groups at any point the first 12 weeks after surgery ( p = 0.67). Both groups significantly improved after surgery ( p < 0.001). After 3 months follow-up there were no differences between groups for the HAGOS questionnaire except for the domain sport ( p = 0.02) in favour of the control group. After 12 months follow-up there were no differences between both treatment groups on all HAGOS domains ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this randomised controlled trial show highest possible evidence that there is no reason for routinely capsular closure after interportal capsulotomy at the end of hip arthroscopy. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at the CCMO Dutch Trial Register: NL55669.048.15.

scholarly journals Open release versus radiofrequency microtenotomy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Hamlin ◽  
Christopher Munro ◽  
Scott L. Barker ◽  
Sean McKenna ◽  
Kapil Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lateral Epicondylitis ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Optimal surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis remains uncertain. Recently, radiofrequency microtenotomy (RFMT) has been proposed as a suitable treatment. We compared RFMT with standard open release (OR) in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods In total, 41 patients with symptoms for at least 6 months were randomized into two groups: 23 patients had RFMT and 18 had OR. Two patients from RFMT withdrew. Each patient underwent Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, grip strength and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores pre-operatively and at 6 weeks. Pain and DASH scores were repeated at 6 months and 12 months. Results NRS pain scores improved by 4.8 points for RFMT and by 3.9 points for OR. There was a significant improvement in both groups from pre-operative scores, although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups at 1 year. Grip strength improved by 31% in the RFMT group compared to 38% in OR. There was no significant difference between the initial and 6 weeks scores or between treatments. At 1 year, DASH was 39.8 points for RFMT and 24.4 points for OR. There was a significant improvement in both groups from pre-operative scores, although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups at 1 year. Conclusions Both groups showed significant improvements and similar benefit to the patient. The results of the present study do not show any benefit of RFMT over the standard OR. As a result of the extra expense of RFMT, we therefore recommend that OR is offered as the standard surgical management.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Computational Virtual Mapping-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Soo Baek ◽  
Oh-Seok Kwon ◽  
Byounghyun Lim ◽  
Song-Yi Yang ◽  
Je-Wook Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Computational Modeling ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Dominant Frequency ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Clinical recurrence after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) still remains high in patients with persistent AF (PeAF). We investigated whether an extra-pulmonary vein (PV) ablation targeting the dominant frequency (DF) extracted from electroanatomical map–integrated AF computational modeling improves the AFCA rhythm outcome in patients with PeAF.Methods: In this open-label, randomized, multi-center, controlled trial, 170 patients with PeAF were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to the computational modeling-guided virtual DF (V-DF) ablation and empirical PV isolation (E-PVI) groups. We generated a virtual dominant frequency (DF) map based on the atrial substrate map obtained during the clinical AF ablation procedure using computational modeling. This simulation was possible within the time of the PVI procedure. V-DF group underwent extra-PV V-DF ablation in addition to PVI, but DF information was not notified to the operators from the core lab in the E-PVI group.Results: After a mean follow-up period of 16.3 ± 5.3 months, the clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower in the V-DF than with E-PVI group (P = 0.018, log-rank). Recurrences appearing as atrial tachycardias (P = 0.145) and the cardioversion rates (P = 0.362) did not significantly differ between the groups. At the final follow-up, sinus rhythm was maintained without any AADs in 74.7% in the V-DF group and 48.2% in the E-PVI group (P &lt; 0.001). No significant difference was found in the major complication rates (P = 0.489) or total procedure time (P = 0.513) between the groups. The V-DF ablation was independently associated with a reduced AF recurrence after AFCA [hazard ratio: 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.88); P = 0.016].Conclusions: The computational modeling-guided V-DF ablation improved the rhythm outcome of AFCA in patients with PeAF.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service, CRIS identifier: KCT0003613.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document