Asymmetric pelvis and term breech presentation: is planned vaginal delivery still a safe option?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lallemant ◽  
T. Ceri ◽  
Y. Offringa ◽  
S. Aubry ◽  
A. Bourtembourg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Safe Option

Breech Presentation: Vaginal Delivery or Caesarean Section?

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Tomescu Cezar Laurentiu ◽  
Rodica Sîrbu ◽  
Emin Cadar ◽  
Brezeanu Dragos ◽  
Aneta Tomescu
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Population Sample ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Current Paper ◽  
Clinical Hospital ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Number Of Patients

The incidence of breech presentation is approximately 3,97%. Breech presentation is considered as being “borderline eutocic” and it requires carefully monitoring both the foetus and the mother. The aim of the current paper is to evaluate the preffered method of delivery in case of breech presentation. The paper presents a retrospective study performed in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Departments of the County Emergency Clinical Hospital “Sf. Apostol Andrei” in Constanta, during a period of 5 years (2010-2014). The methods of birth were analyzed for a lot of 1104 patients with breech presentation with ages ranging between 16 and 44 years old. The total number of patients who gave birth through vaginal delivery was of 139 patients, amounting to 12.59% of the total population sample. The number of patients that gave birth through C-section was 965, which amounts to 87.4% of the total population sample. Birth through C-section is preferred by both obstetricians and patients alike, due to the fact that vaginal delivery is associated with a higher foetal risk in breech presentation.

Fetal Malpresentation in Pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afshin Azimirad ◽  
Errol R. Norwitz
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
External Cephalic Version ◽  
Breech Delivery ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Ultrasound Evaluation ◽  
Elective Repeat Cesarean ◽  
Anatomical Part

Fetal presentation refers to that anatomical part of the fetus that presents at the maternal pelvic inlet. The most common and most desirable fetal presentation is cephalic (head first). Any presentation other than cephalic is referred to as a malpresentation. Breech is the most common fetal malpresentation. The prevalence of breech presentation varies with gestational age (25% at 28 weeks and 3-5% of at term). Ultrasound evaluation is the gold standard for the diagnosis of fetal presentation. External cephalic version (ECV) refers to a series of manual manipulations designed to convert a malpresenting fetus to cephalic to promote vaginal delivery. There are two strategies around the timing of ECV; at 36-37 weeks and/or at or shortly after 39 weeks’ gestation. Each has advantages and disadvantages. Currently, most breech pregnancies at term are delivered by cesarean at 39 weeks prior to the onset of labor. Malpresentation is the second most common indication for planned cesarean (behind elective repeat cesarean). Vaginal delivery for a breech fetus at term should only be attempted if the mother is strongly motivated, if the obstetric care provider is experienced, and if the medical center has the requisite facilities to manage any and all complications. This review contains 3 figures, 2 tables, and 66 references. Keywords: fetal presentation, malpresentation, breech presentation, ultrasound evaluation, external cephalic version (ECV), cesarean delivery, vaginal breech delivery

scholarly journals Reduction of maternal and neonatal harm through prevention of the primary Cesarean section

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-21
Author(s):  
Andrew Welton
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Common Knowledge ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
External Cephalic Version ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Nulliparous Women

While there are clear life-saving indications for Cesarean section (C-section), rates of this procedure have seen a continued rise without a concomitant improvement in maternal or neonatal outcomes. There is some evidence that outcomes may actually be worse for low-risk C-sections versus vaginal delivery. However, this is not necessarily common knowledge for healthcare providers, and therefore, their patients. Measures to safely reduce the C-section rate target management of labour arrest and specific indications for progression to C-section. In the active phase of the first stage of labour, C-section should be considered only in cases of failure to progress after 4 hours of adequate uterine contraction, or 6 hours of inadequate contraction. In the second stage of labour, expectant management of 3 hours of pushing in nulliparous women and 2 hours in multiparous women is safe and appropriate. Furthermore, manual rotation and operative vaginal delivery in the second stage are reasonable alternatives to C-section. Expectant management is also appropriate for certain non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracings. In post-dates pregnancies, induction of labour reduces both rates of C-section and neonatal mortality. Finally, evidence supports the use of external cephalic version in breech presentation as well as a more conservative approach to suspected macrosomia and multiple pregnancy. Taken together, these measures target the most common indications for progression to C-section and can allow us to safely reduce the C-section rate. Educating patients and physicians on the risks of the procedure and reasonable alternatives can improve outcomes for mothers and neonates.

scholarly journals Vaginal Delivery versus Elective Caesarean Section for Breech Presentation - Experience in Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH)

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Mahe Jabeen ◽  
Sabiha Shimul ◽  
Ummay Salma ◽  
Jebunnesa
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Compared with a fetus with cephalic presentation, a breech fetus faces increased risk during labour and delivery of asphyxia from cord compression and of traumatic injury during delivery of the shoulders and head. Caesarean section avoids most of this risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of vaginal delivery of uncomplicated singleton breech presentation by evaluating early neonatal morbidity and mortality as well as maternal morbidity following vaginal and caesarean delivery for breech presentation. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional comparative study.104 women with singleton breech presentation at term in labour were included consequetively in labour ward of Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH). Informed consent was taken from them. Neonatal and maternal outcome were recorded and statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22. Results: APGAR at 5 min and Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU) admission were not affected by mode of delivery. Long term neonatal outcome is similar in either mode of delivery. Maternal morbidity and duration of hospital stay is increased in caesarean births. Conclusion: Neonatal outcome did not depend on mode of delivery though maternal morbidity and cost of care is increased following Caesarean Section. Proper selection of cases and by improving skill & confidence in new generation obstetrician, vaginal delivery of singleton fetuses in breech presentation at term remains a safe option that can be offered to a woman in a tertiary care centre. Medicine Today 2019 Vol.31(1): 23-26

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document