scholarly journals Das Nationale Krebspräventionszentrum

Der Onkologe ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Baumann ◽  
Anja Braun ◽  
Ulrike Helbig ◽  
Gerd Nettekoven ◽  
Ursula Will

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Zahl der Krebserkrankungen wird sich in den nächsten Jahren deutlich erhöhen. Liegt die Zahl der Neuerkrankungen in Deutschland aktuell bei rund 500.000 pro Jahr, prognostizieren Experten für 2030 einen Anstieg um 20 % auf 600.000 Neuerkrankungen. Mit den zur Verfügung stehenden primärpräventiven Maßnahmen könnten schon heute rund 40 % aller Krebserkrankungen verhindert werden. Laut Schätzungen im europäischen Raum wäre über den gesamten translationalen Ansatz von Krebsforschung und onkologischer Versorgung einschließlich Ansätzen der Prävention ein krebsspezifisches 10-Jahres-Überleben von etwa 75 % im Jahr 2030 zu erreichen. Dennoch ist das Gesundheitswesen in Deutschland weit davon entfernt, dieses Potenzial voll auszuschöpfen – es fehlt an evidenzbasierten, kosteneffektiven und flächendeckenden Präventionsangeboten. Schlussfolgerung Ein systematischer Ausbau der angewandten Prävention und Präventionsforschung ist notwendig, um das Entstehen von Krebserkrankungen zu verhindern und den Anteil früh erkannter und mit heutigen Methoden heilbarer Krebserkrankungen messbar zu erhöhen. Hier setzt das im Herbst 2019 gemeinsam vom Deutschen Krebsforschungszentrum und der Deutschen Krebshilfe gegründete Nationale Krebspräventionszentrum an. Das Zentrum soll im Sinne eines Comprehensive Prevention Center hochrangige Präventionsforschung, Aus- und Weiterbildung sowie Öffentlichkeitsarbeit und Politikberatung direkt unter einem Dach vereinen und über Outreach-Programme und Netzwerkbildung flächendeckend implementieren. Dabei folgt es einer translationalen Strategie von der Grundlagenforschung bis hin zur Einführung neuer Methoden in evidenzbasierte flächendeckende Präventionssysteme.

Crisis ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merete Nordentoft ◽  
Jacob Branner

The objective was to examine gender differences in choice of method and suicidal intent among persons referred to a suicide prevention center. A total of 351 consecutive patients who had attempted suicide were interviewed using the European Parasuicide Study Interview Schedule I (EPSIS I) while participating in a 2-week inpatient treatment program. They were invited to a 1-year follow-up interview, and followed in the National Patient Register. Compared to women, men who had attempted suicide were older, had better self-esteem, fewer depressive symptoms, and higher total suicidal intention scores, but they were not more likely to use violent methods. Neither use of violent method nor dangerousness of the attempt was associated with suicidal intention. Although men had higher suicide intent scores than women, there were no significant gender differences in the number of repeat suicide attempts during a 1-year follow-up period. Suicidal intent was not related to dangerousness of suicide method.


1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 580-590
Author(s):  
Jan Niessen

In the 1970s, during the Cold War era, European and North American states began a dialogue in Helsinki which became known as the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), or the Helsinki process. For Western states the CSCE served as a platform to raise questions related to security in Europe and the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Eastern European states considered the CSCE as a means to secure the postwar borders and an opportunity to discuss economic and scientific cooperation. Today, 51 European States, plus the United States of America and Canada, participate in this process. Notwithstanding the many and often intense political tensions between the West and the East during those twenty years, quite a number of conferences, seminars and other meetings were held and a great many agreements were adopted and documents issued, dealing with matters related to CSCE's three main areas of concern: security in Europe; cooperation in the fields of economics, science, technology and environment; the promotion of human rights. In response to the fundamental changes in Europe in the late 1980s, the CSCE was given a new impetus and its operational framework was broadened. CSCE offices were established in Prague (CSCE Secretariat), Vienna (Conflict Prevention Center) and Warsaw (Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights) with the aim to strengthen and monitor compliance with CSCE commitments, especially in the area of human rights. A Parliamentary Assembly was established and met twice, first in Budapest and then in Helsinki. A General Secretary and a High Commissioner on Minorities were appointed, with offices in Vienna and The Hague, respectively.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 276.e1-276.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Mayeda ◽  
Earl S. Hishinuma ◽  
Stephanie T. Nishimura ◽  
Orlando Garcia-Santiago ◽  
Gregory Y. Mark

Author(s):  
A J Shaw ◽  
T G Harrison ◽  
K L Shallcross ◽  
S J Williams ◽  
D E Shallcross

Analysis of the average number of applicants received from schools that engaged in the Bristol ChemLabS Outreach program prior to a student‟s application with those that did not engage, shows a significant increase in applicants from engaged schools. The significance is weaker when just Post 16 students are considered but this is almost certainly due to a smaller sample size. When this analysis was inspected in terms of the distance of the school from the University of Bristol, there was an increase in the number of applicants from engaged schools irrespective of distance. However, a statistically significant increase was observed for schools within 50 miles of the University from an analysis of just Post 16 students. Students who applied to the department from an engaged school were more likely to accept an offer and also to make the department their firm acceptance. A slightly higher number of applications that were rejected came from engaged schools too. There are two possible reasons; first, the engagement may have encouraged more students who did not have the required entry qualifications. Second, during the period of analysis, the overall entry grades went up by one grade each year. Such a dramatic rise was probably the reason for the slightly elevated numbers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Maraghi ◽  
Amal Saki Malehi ◽  
Fakher Rahim

Objectives: To review the most recent GHS index annual report to observe the regional and global level of health security against the COVID-19 outbreak, as well as their relationship with the case fatality rate, among 210 countries and territories worldwide. Methods: We analyzed October 2019 GHS index, to assess the capacity of health security-based on the GHS index in the context of six categories. We prioritized not only the capacities of 210 countries and territories around the world using the GHS index but also the existence of functional capabilities to prevent pandemics at the source. Data were collected from global databases, including Worldometer, WHO, and Disease Control and Prevention Center (CDC). Results: This study collected data on 210 countries and territories, of which up to April 14, 2020, 72 countries (34.28%) with more than 1,000 total COVID-19 cases were present. In the most prepared group, the number of total COVID-19 diagnostic tests had a significant positive relationship with the GHS index (r = 0.713; P = 0.006). Case fatality rate was directly associated with the detection index (r = 0.304; P = 0.023) in more prepared group”. In the Lower-middle-income economies group, the case fatality rate was positively related to detection, response, and risk environment indices. Conclusions: With the exception of a very small number, countries that were ranked as most prepared countries were more likely to be affected by the COVID-19 outbreak of the virus and its health consequences and needed to seriously reconsider their capabilities and health security in the context of detection, prevention, rapid response, health system facilities, and risk environment against disease outbreak.


Author(s):  
Pratiksha S. Thakare ◽  
Samruddhi Gujar ◽  
Shakib Sheikh ◽  
Vrushali Dighikar

The causative factors of Coronavirus disease mainly the viruses. Through news we aware that pneumonia cases seen recently in Wuhan city, China. Due to unknown causes. Coronaviruses that cause illness such as a common cold. The Coronavirus infection identified with respiratory symptoms and pneumonia, the severe form of coronavirus infection mainly associated with death and low immune system patients. It is very important for us to more focus on geriatric people because in our countries, geriatric group people facing health problems at this present situation. According to articles Clinical Pathology, Pathogenesis, Immunopathology, and Mitigation Strategies, in that said geriatric people and low immune system patient with symptoms related history are more prone to COVID infection. But according to recent information by WHO all people are at risk of coronavirus but mostly geriatric people facing more risk of developing a severe respiratory infection. Geriatric people easily get coronavirus syndrome due to physical changes that occur as increasing age. There were 95% of these deaths seen in geriatric people above 60 years older. Above 50% of all fatal conditions occurred in geriatric people between 60- 80 years ago. There having disease control and prevention center, which indicate that rates of hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions and mortality reported among COVID-19 cases in the United States are substantially higher among patients older than 45 years compared with younger patients, with case-fatality rates exceeding 1.4% among patients aged 55 to 64 years and exceeding 2.7% among those aged 65 to 74 years.


2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Morrow

Environmental activism has a long history in protest, addressing issues of degradation and segregation that threaten existing ecologies, social and built fabrics. Environmental activism is traditionally understood as a reaction, chiefly by groups of people, against a perceived external threat. In the 60’s and 70’s, an activist stance began to emerge in the work of some artists and architects, who used creative methods such as performances, happenings, temporary spatial interventions etc to convey their political/aesthetic messages. Some of this work engaged directly with communities but predominantly it was the production of one individual working ‘outside’ society. However such actions demonstrated not only the power of the visual in conveying a political message but also the potential of conceptual creative approaches to reveal alternative values and hidden potentials. This marked a shift from activism as protestation towards an activism of reconceptualisation. Recently, activist groups have developed a more politically informed process. Whilst their ‘tools’ may resemble work from the 60’s and 70’s, their methodologies are nontraditional, ’rhizomatic’, pedagogical and fluid; working alongside, rather than against, the established power and funding structures. Such creative processes build new, often unexpected, stakeholder networks; offer neutral spaces in which contentious issues can be faced; and create better understanding of values and identities. They can also lead to permanent improvements and development in the physical fabric. This paper will discuss a pedagogical example of activism in architectural education. The event (www.fourdaysontheoutside.com) is in its fifth year of existence and as such has revealed a value and impulse beyond its learning and teaching value. The paper will discuss how the event contributes to the university’s outreach programme and how its structure acts as a seedbed for potential research projects and partnerships. UK Universities talk extensively about applied research but have few actual strategies by which to generate it. Fourdaysontheoutside offers some potential ways forward.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Bastholt ◽  
Michael C. Kreissl ◽  
Dagmar Führer ◽  
Ana L. Maia ◽  
Laura D. Locati ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document