scholarly journals Deep brain stimulation electrodes may rotate after implantation—an animal study

Author(s):  
Alexander Rau ◽  
H. Urbach ◽  
V. A. Coenen ◽  
K. Egger ◽  
P. C. Reinacher

Abstract Directional deep brain stimulation (dDBS) electrodes allow to steer the electrical field in a specific direction. When implanted with torque, they may rotate for a certain time after implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether and to which degree leads rotate in the first 24 h after implantation using a sheep brain model. dDBS electrodes were implanted in 14 sheep heads and 3D rotational fluoroscopy (3D-RF) scans were acquired to visualize the orientation of the electrode leads. Electrode leads were clockwise rotated just above the burr holes (180° n = 6, 360° n = 6, 2 controls) and 3D-RF scans were again acquired after 3, 6, 13, 17, and 24 h, respectively. One hundred eighty degree rotated electrodes showed an initial rotation of 83.5° (range: 35.4°–128.3°) and a rotation of 114.0° (range: 57°–162°) after 24 h. With 360° torsion, mean initial rotation was 201° (range: 3.3°–321.4°) and mean rotation after 24 h 215.7° (range 31.9°–334.7°), respectively. Direct postoperative imaging may not be accurate for determining the rotation of dDBS electrodes if torque is present.

2011 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nader Pouratian ◽  
Davis L. Reames ◽  
Robert Frysinger ◽  
W. Jeff Elias

Object The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for postoperative seizures after deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead implantation surgery and the impact of such seizures on length of stay and discharge disposition. Methods The authors reviewed a consecutive series of 161 cases involving patients who underwent implantation of 288 electrodes for treatment of movement disorders at a single institution to determine the absolute risk of postoperative seizures, to describe the timing and type of seizures, to identify statistically significant risk factors for seizures, and to determine whether there are possible indications for seizure prophylaxis after DBS lead implantation. The electronic medical records were reviewed to identify demographic details, medical history, operative course, and postoperative outcomes and complications. To evaluate significant associations between potential risk factors and postoperative seizures, both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results Seven (4.3%) of 161 patients experienced postoperative seizures, all of which were documented to have been generalized tonic-clonic seizures. In 5 (71%) of 7 cases, patients only experienced a single seizure. Similarly, in 5 of 7 cases, patients experienced seizures within 24 hours of surgery. In 6 (86%) of the 7 cases, seizures occurred within 48 hours of surgery. Univariate analysis identified 3 significant associations (or risk factors) for postoperative seizures: abnormal findings on postoperative imaging (hemorrhage, edema, and or ischemia; p < 0.001), age greater than 60 years (p = 0.021), and transventricular electrode trajectories (p = 0.023). The only significant factor identified on multivariate analysis was abnormal findings on postoperative imaging (p < 0.0001, OR 50.4, 95% CI 5.7–444.3). Patients who experienced postoperative seizures had a significantly longer length of stay than those who were seizure free (mean ± SD 5.29 ± 3.77 days vs 2.38 ± 2.38 days; p = 0.002, Student 2-tailed t-test). Likewise, final discharge to home was significantly less likely in patients who experienced seizures after implantation (43%) compared with those patients who did not (92%; p = 0.00194, Fisher exact test). Conclusions These results affirm that seizures are an uncommon complication of DBS surgery and generally occur within 48 hours of surgery. The results also indicate that hemorrhage, edema, or ischemia on postoperative images (“abnormal” imaging findings) increases the relative risk of postoperative seizures by 30- to 50-fold, providing statistical credence to the long-held assumption that seizures are associated with intracranial vascular events. Even in the setting of a postimplantation imaging abnormality, long-term anticonvulsant therapy will not likely be required because none of our patients developed chronic epilepsy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 833-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greydon Gilmore ◽  
Donald H. Lee ◽  
Andrew Parrent ◽  
Mandar Jog

2017 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 2438-2449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Ching Chen ◽  
Pei-Yi Chu ◽  
Tsung-Hsun Hsieh ◽  
Yu-Ting Li ◽  
Chih-Wei Peng

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Kramme ◽  
Till A. Dembek ◽  
Harald Treuer ◽  
Haidar S. Dafsari ◽  
Michael T. Barbe ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Directional leads are increasingly used in deep brain stimulation. They allow shaping the electrical field in the axial plane. These new possibilities increase the complexity of programming. Thus, optimized programming approaches are needed to assist clinical testing and to obtain full clinical benefit. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This simulation study investigates to what extent the electrical field can be shaped by directional steering to compensate for lead malposition. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Binary volumes of tissue activated (VTA) were simulated, by using a finite element method approach, for different amplitude distributions on the three directional electrodes. VTAs were shifted from 0 to 2 mm at different shift angles with respect to the lead orientation, to determine the best compensation of a target volume. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Malpositions of 1 mm can be compensated with the highest gain of overlap with directional leads. For larger shifts, an improvement of overlap of 10–30% is possible, depending on the stimulation amplitude and shift angle of the lead. Lead orientation and shift determine the amplitude distribution of the electrodes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> To get full benefit from directional leads, both the shift angle as well as the shift to target volume are required to choose the correct amplitude distribution on the electrodes. Current directional leads have limitations when compensating malpositions &#x3e;1 mm; however, they still outperform conventional leads in reducing overstimulation. Further, their main advantage probably lies in the reduction of side effects. Databases like the one from this simulation could serve for optimized lead programming algorithms in the future.


2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 949-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Hemm ◽  
Gérard Mennessier ◽  
Nathalie Vayssiere ◽  
Laura Cif ◽  
Hassan El Fertit ◽  
...  

Object. Adjusting electrical parameters used in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia remains time consuming and is currently based on clinical observation alone. The goal of this study was to visualize electrical parameters around the electrode, to correlate these parameters with the anatomy of the globus pallidus internus (GPI), and to study the relationship between the volume of stimulated tissue and the electrical parameter settings. Methods. The authors developed a computer-assisted methodological model for visualizing electrical parameters (the isopotential and the isoelectric field magnitude), with reference to the stereotactic target, for different stimulation settings (monopolar and bipolar) applied during DBS. Electrical field values were correlated with the anatomy of the GPI, which was determined by performing stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging in one reference patient. By using this method it is possible to compare potential and electrical field distributions for different stimulation modes. In monopolar and bipolar stimulation, the shape and distribution of the potential and electrical field are different and depend on the stimulation voltage. Distributions visualized for patient-specific parameters can be subsequently correlated with anatomical information. The application of this method to one patient demonstrated that the 0.2-V/mm isofield line fits best with the lateral GPI borders at the level of the stimulated contacts. Conclusions. The electrical field is a crucial parameter because it is assumed to be responsible for triggering action potentials. Electrical field visualization allows the calculation of the stimulated volume for a given isoline. Its application to an entire series of patients may help determine a threshold for obtaining a therapeutic effect, which is currently unknown, and consequently may aid in optimizing parameter settings in individual patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 448-454
Author(s):  
Thomas Grunwald ◽  
Judith Kröll

Zusammenfassung. Wenn mit den ersten beiden anfallspräventiven Medikamenten keine Anfallsfreiheit erzielt werden konnte, so ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dies mit anderen Medikamenten zu erreichen, nur noch ca. 10 %. Es sollte dann geprüft werden, warum eine Pharmakoresistenz besteht und ob ein epilepsiechirurgischer Eingriff zur Anfallsfreiheit führen kann. Ist eine solche Operation nicht möglich, so können palliative Verfahren wie die Vagus-Nerv-Stimulation (VNS) und die tiefe Hirnstimulation (Deep Brain Stimulation) in eine bessere Anfallskontrolle ermöglichen. Insbesondere bei schweren kindlichen Epilepsien stellt auch die ketogene Diät eine zu erwägende Option dar.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document