The relation between stressful life events and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 176 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narjes Bahri ◽  
Tahereh Fathi Najafi ◽  
Fatemeh Homaei Shandiz ◽  
Hamid Reza Tohidinik ◽  
Abdoljavad Khajavi
2020 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 731-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. Howarth ◽  
Daryl B. O'Connor ◽  
Maria Panagioti ◽  
Alexander Hodkinson ◽  
Sarah Wilding ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (suppl 3) ◽  
pp. S453-S463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Míria Conceição Lavinas Santos ◽  
Bernardo Lessa Horta ◽  
João Joaquim Freitas do Amaral ◽  
Paula Frassinetti Castelo Branco Camurça Fernandes ◽  
Cristina Maria Galvão ◽  
...  

The objective of the current meta-analysis was to verify the association between stressful life events and primary breast cancer incidence in women. A total of 618 studies from 1982-2007 were found in the PubMed, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases. Methodological quality was evaluated according to the Downs & Black criteria. Eight studies were selected (six case-controls and two cohorts). The studies were grouped in three analyses, two of which based on the categories widowhood and divorce and the other based on self-rated intensity and frequency of stressful events. Relative risks were: widowhood 1.04 (95%CI: 0.75-1.44; p = 0.800); divorce 1.03 (95%: 0.72-1.48; p = 0.850); and intensity/frequency of stress 1.73 (95%CI: 0.98-3.05; p = 0.059). We conclude that stressful life events as a whole are not associated with risk of breast cancer in women. However, it is not possible to rule out high-intensity stress as a risk factor for breast cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brunetta Porcelli ◽  
Andrea Pozza ◽  
Nicola Bizzaro ◽  
Andrea Fagiolini ◽  
Maria-Cristina Costantini ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 1023-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia F.A. Duijts ◽  
Maurice P.A. Zeegers ◽  
Bart Vd Borne

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Katherine H. Franks ◽  
Lisa Bransby ◽  
Michael M. Saling ◽  
Matthew P. Pase

Background: Although many studies have investigated the association between stress and risk of dementia, findings are inconsistent due to the variation in the measures used to assess stress. Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between psychological stress (including neuroticism, stressful life events, and perceived stress) and the risk of incident dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults. Methods: PsycINFO, Embase, and MEDLINE were searched to October 2020 for eligible observational, prospective studies. Of the 1,607 studies screened, 26 (24 unique cohorts) were included in the qualitative analysis and 16 (15 unique cohorts) were included in the quantitative analysis. Results: Across studies, higher perceived stress was significantly associated with an increased risk of mild cognitive impairment (Cases/Total N = 207/860: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03–1.38) and all-cause dementia (Cases/Total N = 203/1,882: HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.07–1.95). Exposure to two or more stressful life events (versus none) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause dementia (Cases/Total N = 3,354/11,597: HR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.14–2.60), while one or more stressful life events was not. Higher neuroticism was significantly associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease dementia (Cases/Total N = 497/4,771: HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.12), but not all-cause dementia. Conclusion: This review suggests that psychological stress in adulthood is associated with an increased risk of dementia. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying these associations.


2022 ◽  
pp. 105566562110455
Author(s):  
Christina Tran ◽  
Andrew A. Crawford ◽  
Alexander Hamilton ◽  
Clare E. French ◽  
Yvonne Wren ◽  
...  

Objective To assess whether women who experience stressful life events during the periconceptional period are at higher risk of giving birth to a baby with an orofacial cleft (OFC). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the proportion of babies born with OFC to mothers exposed and unexposed to population-level or personal-level stressful life events during the periconceptional period. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Odds ratios (ORs) for the odds of OFC in babies of exposed mothers relative to unexposed controls were extracted and/or calculated. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken, stratified by cleft subtype. Results Of 12 eligible studies, 8 examined experience of personal events and 4 examined population-level events. Studies demonstrated low-moderate risk of bias and there was indication of publication bias. There was some evidence that personal stressful life events were associated with greater odds of cleft lip and/or palate (six studies, OR 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16, 2.30, P = 0.001) and cleft palate only (six studies, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.06, P = 0.04). Population-level events were associated with higher odds of OFC in studies that did not specify subtype (three studies, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19, 2.25, P = 0.002), but subtype stratified analyses were underpowered. Heterogeneity was high. Conclusions Limited evidence indicated a weak positive association between maternal stressful life events during the periconceptional period and risk of OFC in the offspring, but further studies with greater consistency in research design are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document