The Effect of Common Knowledge Construction Model-Based Instruction on 7th Grade Students’ Academic Achievement and Their Views about the Nature of Science in the Electrical Energy Unit at Schools of Different Socio-economic Levels

Author(s):  
Belkiz Caymaz ◽  
Abdullah Aydin
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
Hasan Bakırcı ◽  
Muammer Çalık ◽  
Salih Çepni

The aim of the present research was to explore the effect of the Common Knowledge Construction Model (CKCM)-oriented education on sixth grade students' views on the Nature of Science (NOS) and to compare it with the existing learning model (5Es learning model). The research was conducted with a total of 76 students (38 by 38--for experimental and control groups) in 2013-2014 school year. Within a quasi-experimental research design, the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS) and the Student Interview on the Nature of Science Aspects (SINOSA) were used for data collection. Quantitative data from the VNOS were exposed to independent t-test while qualitative data from the interview protocol were analyzed using content analysis. Results of pre-test and pre-interview denoted that both groups properly constructed ‘empirical’ aspect of the NOS while the other aspects of the NOS were naïve and transitional levels. After the intervention, it was found that the control group’s views of the NOS, except for the empirical aspect, were transitional level whilst those of the experimental group were informed level. Further, it was elicited that the experimental group performed the highest change in ‘imaginary and creative’ aspect of the NOS. Key words: CKCM, 5Es learning model, light and sound topic, nature of science, science education.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Esra BENLİ ÖZDEMİR ◽  
Ergin HAMZAOĞLU

The main purpose of this study is to explore the effect of the Common Knowledge Construction Model (CKCM) on the academic achievement and attitude towards science of primary education students in science topics. The group in this study consists of 87 students from four different classrooms of 7 th and 8th grades. This study in which the integrated design of the mixed method. Science and Technology class was taught based on the CKCM in the experimental group and 5E learning cycle was applied in the control group. Data of the study were obtained as a result of conducting the academic achievement tests, attitude towards science test, views on phenomenographic categories, classroom observation notes, video records. As a result, the students of the 7th grade were effective on improving the students’ developing their academic achievement. On the other hand, the students of the 8th grade were led to a medium level improvement in developing the viewpoints of the students on academic achievement. 7th and 8th grade Science and Technology lessons taught based on CKCM were not effective on improving the students’ developing their attitude towards scıence.  It was observed that concepts taught based on phenomena are considered more meaningful and perceived more easily by the students.  Key words: common knowledge construction model, 5E learning cycle model, academic achievement and attitude towards science.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Barış Özden ◽  
Nilgün Yenice

This study aimed to investigate the effect of science teaching, based on the Common Knowledge Construction Model (CKCM), on cognitive and psychomotor learning in 7th-grade students. The study group consisted of 29 students from two public schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education in the 2018-2019 academic year. The study was carried out following a semi-experimental pre-test post-test control group research design. The data were collected with a “Scientific Inquiry Skills Test,” and a “Psychomotor Skills Rubric” (PSR) developed by the researchers. The PSR was used to evaluate the practice exam results of both groups. Data were analyzed with a standard statistics package. It was determined that the scientific inquiry skills post-test scores of the experimental group (X=15.87) were higher than the control group (X=10.92). The difference was observed to be significant. Also, a comparison of the total post-test PSR scores showed a statistically significant difference between the experimental (X=15.44) and control groups (X=13.30).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document