The evaluation of a non-invasive respiratory volume monitor in surgical patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Voscopoulos ◽  
C. Marshall MacNabb ◽  
Jordan Brayanov ◽  
Lizeng Qin ◽  
Jenny Freeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Respiratory Volume ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimuthu Rathnayake ◽  
Mike Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
High Income ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Timely Access ◽  
Referral Systems

Abstract Background Long waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455. Results The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics. Conclusions The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.

scholarly journals Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. e0178756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Robak ◽  
Sonia Vaida ◽  
Mostafa Somri ◽  
Luis Gaitini ◽  
Lisa Füreder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Endotracheal Tube ◽  
Elective Surgery

scholarly journals Utilization of apnea-hypopnea index as a novel predictive factor for difficult mask ventilation in the Chinese population under general anesthesia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Yi Wang ◽  
Jing-Jie Li ◽  
Peng-Cheng Zhao ◽  
Jia-Li Peng ◽  
Rong Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Mask Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Difficult Mask Ventilation ◽  
Physical Status Classification ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Abstract Background: Difficult Mask Ventilation (DMV) is a potentially life-threatening situation that can arise during anesthesia. Accordingly, the majority of current airway management guidelines include risk assessments for DMV. Although Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is among the most important risk factors associated with DMV, other measurements such as the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) may play an important role in determining patient risk.This study investigated the relationship between DMV and AHI, and determined preoperative risk factors for DMV in Chinese patients.Methods: A prospective cohort trial enrolled patients scheduled for elective surgery. After obtaining informed consent, patient demographic information was collected, and patients were tested with pre-operative polysomnography. Inclusion criteria: Patients >18 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) I-III, and planned elective surgery with general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria: malformations of the airway, patients undergoing regional anesthesia, and patients with contraindications to mask ventilation (i.e. planned awake intubation). A logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between AHI and DMV. Results: A total of 159 patients were analyzed. For both primary and secondary outcomes, the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio for DMV showed significant increases of 5 AHI units. AHI, age, and the Mallampati classification were found to be independent predictive factors for DMV.Conclusions AHI is associated with DMV as a novel independent risk factor in Chinese patients. Along with age and Mallampati classification, AHI should be included in establishing a superior predictive strategy DMV screening.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number # ChiCTR17013076; Date of Registration on October 22nd, 2017).

scholarly journals Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation-based titration reduces propofol consumption and incidence of hypotension during general anesthesia induction: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 003685042110523
Author(s):  
Lihong Chen ◽  
Kun Lu ◽  
Tongfeng Luo ◽  
Huiming Liang ◽  
Yuqin Gui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mean Blood Pressure ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Post Intubation

Administration of a single propofol bolus dose for anesthesia induction causes hypotension. We included 160 patients (74 males and 86 females; mean age, 42.4 ± 10.7 [range: 18–60] years) with the American Society of Anesthesiologists status I–II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Using simple randomization, the patients were divided into a conventional group ( n = 80; received 2 mg/kg propofol at a rate of 250 mg/min) and titrated group ( n = 80; received propofol at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min until the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale score reached 1 point). Fentanyl (4 µg/kg) and cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) were administered, as appropriate. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded at different time points. Propofol consumption, hypotension, and other adverse events were recorded. All the patients were intubated without awareness. Compared with the conventional group, the titrated group showed more stable blood pressure ( p < 0.05), as well as a lower decrease in systolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure at 1 and 3 min, and diastolic blood pressure at 1 min after propofol administration ( p < 0.01). Moreover, compared with the conventional group, the titrated group showed a lower post-intubation hypotension incidence (9 vs. 19 cases; p = 0.04), as well as lower total propofol dosage and propofol dose per kilogram of body weight (93.57 ± 14.40 mg vs. 116.80 ± 22.37 mg and 1.73 ± 0.27 mg/kg vs. 2.02 ± 0.08 mg/kg, respectively, p < 0.01). Compared with conventional propofol usage, titrated propofol administration can reduce the incidence of hypotension and propofol consumption during anesthesia induction.

scholarly journals Factors affecting general or regional anesthesia preference in patients with elective surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 570-574
Author(s):  
Esra Adıyeke ◽  
Levent Adıyeke
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Significant Positive Correlation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Foot Surgery ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
To Receive

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors that affect the preference of the anesthesia method in patients who were indicated for general or regional anesthesia. Material and Methods: A descriptive questionnaire was used to evaluate the opinions of 123 patients who were planned to undergo elective surgery in the orthopedics and traumatology outpatient clinic between January 2018 and June 2019. Results: 73 women (%59) and 50 men (%41) participated in the study. The mean age was 58.62±11 years. General anesthesia was preferred in 58% of the patients. The most common reason for rejection was that the patients who preferred general anesthesia did not want to receive visual and auditory stimuli during the surgical procedure. There was a significant positive correlation between education level and regional anesthesia preference rate. There was a significant positive correlation between the regional anesthesia preference rate of patients receiving hand and foot surgery indications. Conclusion: The preference of the majority of patients was found to be general anesthesia method. Additionally, the type of surgery and education level of the patients was found to be effective in preference of the anesthesia method.

Non-invasive carbon dioxide monitoring in patients with cystic fibrosis during general anesthesia: end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne May ◽  
Chris Humston ◽  
Julie Rice ◽  
Christopher J. Nemastil ◽  
Ann Salvator ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Monitoring ◽  
End Tidal

scholarly journals Dynamic Cortical Connectivity during General Anesthesia in Surgical Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 885-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip E. Vlisides ◽  
Duan Li ◽  
Mackenzie Zierau ◽  
Andrew P. Lapointe ◽  
Ka I. Ip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Connectivity ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Phase Lag ◽  
Cortical Connectivity ◽  
Single Measure ◽  
Connectivity Patterns ◽  
Weighted Phase Lag Index

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Functional connectivity across the cortex has been posited to be important for consciousness and anesthesia, but functional connectivity patterns during the course of surgery and general anesthesia are unknown. The authors tested the hypothesis that disrupted cortical connectivity patterns would correlate with surgical anesthesia. Methods Surgical patients (n = 53) were recruited for study participation. Whole-scalp (16-channel) wireless electroencephalographic data were prospectively collected throughout the perioperative period. Functional connectivity was assessed using weighted phase lag index. During anesthetic maintenance, the temporal dynamics of connectivity states were characterized via Markov chain analysis, and state transition probabilities were quantified. Results Compared to baseline (weighted phase lag index, 0.163, ± 0.091), alpha frontal–parietal connectivity was not significantly different across the remaining anesthetic and perioperative epochs, ranging from 0.100 (± 0.041) to 0.218 (± 0.136) (P &gt; 0.05 for all time periods). In contrast, there were significant increases in alpha prefrontal–frontal connectivity (peak = 0.201 [0.154, 0.248]; P &lt; 0.001), theta prefrontal–frontal connectivity (peak = 0.137 [0.091, 0.182]; P &lt; 0.001), and theta frontal–parietal connectivity (peak = 0.128 [0.084, 0.173]; P &lt; 0.001) during anesthetic maintenance. Additionally, shifts occurred between states of high prefrontal–frontal connectivity (alpha, beta) with suppressed frontal–parietal connectivity, and high frontal–parietal connectivity (alpha, theta) with reduced prefrontal–frontal connectivity. These shifts occurred in a nonrandom manner (P &lt; 0.05 compared to random transitions), suggesting structured transitions of connectivity during general anesthesia. Conclusions Functional connectivity patterns dynamically shift during surgery and general anesthesia but do so in a structured way. Thus, a single measure of functional connectivity will likely not be a reliable correlate of surgical anesthesia.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Oral Dexmedetomidine versus Oral Midazolam As preanesthesia Medication in Pediatric Patients to Reduce anxiety

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 724-728
Author(s):  
Sabin Gauchan ◽  
Chitra Thapa ◽  
Abha Prasai
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Separation Anxiety ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety ◽  
Parental Separation ◽  
Emergence Agitation ◽  
Oral Midazolam ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group D

Introduction: Preoperative period is a stressful period. In children the preoperative anxiety is expressed as difficult separation from parents and difficult mask induction. The level of preoperative anxiety also affects postoperative outcomes. To overcome anxiety premedication is often used by pediatric anesthesiologist. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg and oral dexmedetomidine 4μg/kg on parental separation, mask induction and postoperative emergence agitation in children undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Methodology: 120 children aged 2-8years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were divided into two groups: Group M and Group D. Patients in group M received oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg and patients in group D received oral dexmedetomidine 4μg/kg. After 45min of premedication sedation score was assessed in both the groups. Ease of parental separation and mask acceptance was compared in both the groups. In the postoperative period occurrence of emergence agitation was compared in both the groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative sedation score in both the groups. Parent separation anxiety score and mask acceptance score were statistically similar in both the groups. But emergence agitation was significantly lesser in patients who received dexmedetomidine premedication. Conclusions: Premedication with oral midazolam as well as oral dexmedetomidine effectively reduces parental separation anxiety and produces satisfactory mask induction in pediatric age group. However, dexmedetomidine is more effective in reducing emergence delirium in comparison to midazolam.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document