Interplay of nuclear receptors (ER, PR, and GR) and their steroid hormones in MCF-7 cells

2016 ◽  
Vol 422 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 109-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubha M. Hegde ◽  
M. Naveen Kumar ◽  
K. Kavya ◽  
K. M. Kiran Kumar ◽  
Rashmi Nagesh ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Bray ◽  
Jackson CK Brown ◽  
Steve Publicover ◽  
Christopher LR Barratt

In contrast to the classic action of steroid hormones through cytoplasmic/nuclear receptors, there is an accumulating body of data which strongly suggests that they have a direct effect on cells mediated through putative membrane receptors, a so-called non-genomic action. Although such non-genomic effects were discovered 50 years ago it is only in the last 15 years that the subject has become an area of intense research.


2007 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Bezdickova ◽  
Radka Molikova ◽  
Linda Bebarova ◽  
Zdenek Kolar

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Tabb ◽  
Bruce Blumberg

Abstract Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDC) are commonly considered to be compounds that mimic or block the transcriptional activation elicited by naturally circulating steroid hormones by binding to steroid hormone receptors. For example, the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 defines EDC as those, that “may have an effect in humans that is similar to an effect produced by a naturally occurring estrogen, or other such endocrine effect as the Administrator may designate.” The definition of EDC was later expanded to include those that act on the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid hormone receptors. In this minireview, we discuss new avenues through which xenobiotic chemicals influence these and other hormone-dependent signaling pathways. EDC can increase or block the metabolism of naturally occurring steroid hormones and other xenobiotic chemicals by activating or antagonizing nuclear hormone receptors. EDC affect the transcriptional activity of nuclear receptors by modulating proteasome-mediated degradation of nuclear receptors and their coregulators. Xenobiotics and environmental contaminants can act as hormone sensitizers by inhibiting histone deacetylase activity and stimulating mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Some endocrine disrupters can have genome-wide effects on DNA methylation status. Others can modulate lipid metabolism and adipogenesis, perhaps contributing to the current epidemic of obesity. Additional elucidation of these new modes of endocrine disruption will be key in understanding the nature of xenobiotic effects on the endocrine system.


2006 ◽  
Vol 290 (5) ◽  
pp. 1008-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuo-Liang Xiao ◽  
Weibiao Cao ◽  
Piero Biancani ◽  
Jose Behar

Progesterone (PG) affects muscle cells by genomic mechanisms through nuclear receptors and by nongenomic mechanisms through unidentified pathways. This study aimed to determine the pathways mediating its nongenomic actions. Experiments were performed in dissociated muscle cells from guinea pig colons. Nongenomic actions were defined as those occurring within 10 min of PG exposure. PG blocked the contraction to CCK-8 and NKA (10−7 M) but did not impair ACh (10−7 M) and KCl (2.5 × 10−2 M)-induced contraction. Both CCK-8 and NKA contract muscle cells by releasing calcium from intracellular stores, whereas ACh and KCl can utilize extracellular calcium. PG also blocked the contraction induced by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, thapsigargin, and caffeine, agents that contract muscle cells by releasing calcium from storage sites. The nongenomic actions of PG were transient because they were absent 1 h after the first PG dose, remaining unresponsive after a second PG dose was administered. Furthermore, PG had no effect on the contraction induced by CCK-8 and thapsigargin in muscle cells from animals pretreated with daily intramuscular PG for 4 days. Cytosolic incorporation experiments of [3H]PG showed that pretreatment with unlabeled PG significantly reduced the radiolabeled PG incorporation in the cytosol. We conclude that the nongenomic actions of PG on colonic muscle cells transiently blocked calcium release from storage sites, and this response became rapidly desensitized. This effect does not appear to be specific to PG because other steroid hormones such as aldosterone and testosterone can also induce it.


2002 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Marcinkowska ◽  
Antoni Wiedłocha

Steroid hormones in plants and in animals are very important for physiological and developmental regulation. In animals steroid hormones are recognized by nuclear receptors, which transcriptionally regulate specific target genes following binding of the ligand. In addition, numerous rapid effects generated by steroids appear to be mediated by a mechanism not depending on the activation of nuclear receptors. Although the existence of separate membrane receptors was postulated many years ago and hundreds of reports supporting this hypothesis have been published, no animal membrane steroid receptor has been cloned to date. Meanwhile, a plant steroid receptor from Arabidopsis thaliana has been identified and cloned. It is a transmembrane protein which specifically recognizes plant steroids (brassinosteroids) at the cell surface and has a serine/threonine protein kinase activity. It seems that plants have no intracellular steroid receptors, since there are no genes homologous to the family of animal nuclear steroid receptors in the genome of A. thaliana. Since the reason of the rapid responses to steroid hormones in animal cells still remains obscure we show in this article two possible explanations of this phenomenon. Using 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) as an example of animal steroid hormone, we review results of our and of other groups concordant with the hypothesis of membrane steroid receptors. We also review the results of experiments performed with ovarian hormones, that led their authors to the hypothesis explaining rapid steroid actions without distinct membrane steroid receptors. Finally, examples of polypeptide growth factor that similarly to steroids exhibit a dual mode of action, activating not only cell surface receptors, but also intracellular targets, are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document