Age-dependent copy number variations of TP53 tumour suppressor gene associated with altered phosphorylation status of p53 protein in sporadic schwannomas

2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-379
Author(s):  
Hongsai Chen ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Jingjing Zhao ◽  
Zhigang Wang ◽  
Mengling Chang ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 1014-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
France Moreau ◽  
Greg Matlashewski

The p53 tumour suppressor gene is intensively studied because mutations in this gene are the most common genetic alteration so far identified in human cancer. Considerable emphasis has thus been placed on characterizing the biological differences between mutant and wild-type p53 protein. This has led to the realization that in cultured cells, mutant p53 behaves like an oncogene, whereas wild-type p53 is a tumour suppressor gene. The p53 protein is also a target for the tumour virus oncogene products SV40 large T, adenovirus E1B, and human papillomavirus type 16 E6, which are all capable of forming complexes to the p53 protein. Although p53 represents an extremely important cellular regulatory molecule which is well conserved, there exists two allelic variants of wild-type human p53 that differ both in primary and confirmational structure. One variant contains an arginine at amino acid 72 (p53Arg), whereas the other form contains a proline at this residue (p53Pro). The possible implications for more than one allelic variant of wild-type human p53 in the general population is unknown. The present study was undertaken to compare some of the biological features of the different wild-type p53 variants. We present data demonstrating that there was a post-transcriptional selection against accumulation of both variants of wild-type human p53 in 3T3-A31 cells, arguing that both forms are proliferation inhibitory in these cells. Both variants of human p53 were stabilized by SV40 large T, but did not displace mouse p53 from SV40 large T. Neither allelic variant of human p53 was able to reduce significantly SV40-mediated anchorage-independent growth of 3T3-A31 cells. Taken together, these data suggest that although there are structurally different variants of wild-type human p53, there is no difference in the biological activity of these molecules at the level of the biological assays performed here.Key words: human p53, large T, transformation, oncogenes, tumour suppressor.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 457-457
Author(s):  
Anthony V. Moorman ◽  
Sarina Sulong ◽  
Julie A.E. Irving ◽  
Jonathan C. Strefford ◽  
Marian C. Case ◽  
...  

Abstract Genetic alterations play a key role in the leukemogenesis of childhood ALL. Inactivation of CDKN2A (p16), a tumour suppressor gene located at 9p21, can occur by deletion, methylation or mutation. Published reports are inconsistent in terms of incidence and mode of inactivation. We report a comprehensive analysis of CDKN2A inactivation in 1230 diagnostic and 101 relapse samples, including 46 matched diagnostic and relapse pairs, from 1285 children with ALL. Using data from cytogenetics (CC) (n=1088), FISH (n=1209), SNP arrays (SNPA) (n=106), CGH arrays (aCGH) (n=106), dHPLC (n=48) and methylation specific-PCR (MSP) (n=96) we have assessed the mode and frequency of CDKN2A inactivation. Mutation or methylation of CDKN2A was rare occurring in 1 patient each (2% and 1% respectively). In contrast, CDKN2A deletion was highly prevalent. The frequencies of deletion detected by the different methodologies were: CC 166 (15%), FISH 335 (28%), SNPA 17 (16%) and aCGH 35 (33%). The proportion of biallelic deletions also varied: CC 15 (9%), FISH 174 (52%) and aCGH 15 (65%). This variation was directly related to the resolution of each technique with a high degree of concordance across samples investigated by >1 method. Analysis of 50 deletions by aCGH showed that the size of the deletion ranged from 0.03Mb to 39.1Mb with a mean of 14.8Mb. Furthermore, analysis of 15 biallelic deletions demonstrated that they comprised one large deletion (mean size 23.3Mb) and a second much smaller deletion (mean size 1.4Mb). In addition, SNPA revealed copy number neutral LOH in 8 (8%) cases, but only once in association with a CDKN2A mutation. At diagnosis CDKN2A inactivation by any method was noted in 329 (27%) patients which was not different from that observed at relapse [25 (25%)]. However, the frequencies of CDKN2A inactivation and biallelic deletion were significantly greater in T-ALL compared with B cell precursor (BCP) ALL: 135/269 (50%) v 190/918 (21%) (p<0.001) and 83/135 (61%) v 82/190 (43%) (p=0.001), respectively. Within BCP-ALL, older patients (10+ yrs) were more likely to have CDKN2A inactivation compared to younger patients (<10 yrs) whereas the reverse was true in T-ALL: 52/196 (27%) v 138/722 (19%) (p=0.023) and 53/126 (42%) v 82/143 (57%) (p=0.012). Among 46 matched samples CDKN2A inactivation was retained (n=8), lost (n=3) or gained (n=6). The frequency of CDKN2A inactivation was strongly correlated with cytogenetics. Lower frequencies were observed among high hyperdiploid [31/302 (10%) p<0.001] and ETV6-RUNX1 patients [36/236 (15%) p=0.02] with higher frequencies among those with t(9;22) [11/19 (58%) p<0.001], t(1;19) [10/25 (40%) p=0.019] and other abnormalities [92/226 (41%) p<0.001]. In conclusion, we have confirmed the importance of CDKN2A inactivation in childhood ALL and demonstrated that by far the most prevalent method of inactivation is deletion. While it is clear that loss of CDKN2A acts as a cooperating mutation in childhood ALL it is strongly correlated with age, phenotype and genotype. The observation that it is negatively correlated with good risk cytogenetic subgroups may explain why it has been inconsistently associated with a poor outcome. The discovery of copy number neutral LOH at 9p with no evidence of CDKN2A inactivation suggests the presence of another tumour suppressor gene or oncogene in this region.


The Lancet ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 365 (9464) ◽  
pp. 1026-1027
Author(s):  
A BITTON ◽  
M NEUMAN ◽  
J BARNOYA ◽  
S GLANTZ

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Pilsworth ◽  
Anne‐Laure Todeschini ◽  
Samantha J. Neilson ◽  
Dawn R. Cochrane ◽  
Daniel Lai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document