scholarly journals Transboundary Water Resources Allocation under Various Parametric Conditions: The Case of the Euphrates & Tigris River Basin

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 3515-3538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kucukmehmetoglu ◽  
Abdurrahman Geymen
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Resources Allocation ◽  
Water Resources Allocation ◽  
Transboundary Water ◽  
Transboundary Water Resources ◽  
Tigris River

scholarly journals Weighted Bankruptcy Rules and Transboundary Water Resources Allocation

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 2303-2321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hojjat Mianabadi ◽  
Erik Mostert ◽  
Saket Pande ◽  
Nick van de Giesen
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Resources Allocation ◽  
Water Resources Allocation ◽  
Transboundary Water ◽  
Transboundary Water Resources

scholarly journals Comparison of Transboundary Water Resources Allocation Models Based on Game Theory and Multi-Objective Optimization

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1421
Author(s):  
Jisi Fu ◽  
Ping-An Zhong ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Feilin Zhu ◽  
Juan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Resources Allocation ◽  
Game Model ◽  
Water Resources Allocation ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Transboundary Water ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Transboundary Water Resources

Transboundary water resources allocation is an effective measure to resolve water-related conflicts. Aiming at the problem of water conflicts, we constructed water resources allocation models based on game theory and multi-objective optimization, and revealed the differences between the two models. We compare the Pareto front solved by the AR-MOEA method and the NSGA-II method, and analyzed the difference between the Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower game model and the multi-objective optimization model. The Huaihe River basin was selected as a case study. The results show that: (1) The AR-MOEA method is better than the NSGA-II method in terms of the diversity metric (Δ); (2) the solution of the asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower game model is a non-dominated solution, and the asymmetric game model can obtain the same water resources allocation scheme of the multi-objective optimal allocation model under a specific preference structure; (3) after the multi-objective optimization model obtains the Pareto front, it still needs to construct the preference information of the Pareto front for a second time to make the optimal solution of a multi-objective decision, while the game model can directly obtain the water resources allocation scheme at one time by participating in the negotiation. The results expand the solution method of water resources allocation models and provide support for rational water resources allocation.

scholarly journals Optimal Water Resources Allocation under the Constraint of Land Use in the Heihe River Basin of China

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1558-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanqi Wang ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
Xiangzheng Deng ◽  
Xi Lan
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Heihe River Basin ◽  
Resources Allocation ◽  
Heihe River ◽  
Water Resources Allocation ◽  
The Heihe River Basin

Emergency water supply decision-making of transboundary river basin considering government–public perceived satisfaction

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 381-401
Author(s):  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Haiwei Zhou ◽  
Lidan Guo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Water Supply ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Transboundary Water ◽  
The Public ◽  
Transboundary Water Resources ◽  
Perceived Satisfaction ◽  
Emergency Water Supply

The emergency supply of transboundary water resources is a prominent problem affecting the social and economic development of basin countries. However, current water supply decisions on transboundary water resources may ignore the psychological perception of multi-stakeholders, and the evolution of emergencies increases the uncertainty of decision making. Both factors would lead to the low acceptance of water-related decisions. Utility satisfaction, perceived losses, and quantity satisfaction were selected in this paper to identify the perceived satisfaction of upstream governments, downstream governments, and the public, respectively, over multiple decision-making stages. A modeling framework combining prospect theory and the multi-stage multi-objective programming methodology was then developed to measure the perceived satisfaction of different stakeholders in a watershed under emergency. A two-stage NSGA-II and TOPSIS based approach was adopted to find the optimal compromise solution to solve the model. The framework was applied in the Lancang–Mekong River basin to provide suggestions to decision makers. Upstream decision makers must choose a moderate proportional fairness degree when making emergency decisions to maximize the perceived satisfaction of all stakeholders. Meanwhile, the perceived loss of downstream countries with low water demand should be considered first in the formulation of emergency water supply plans. Furthermore, although water supply from upstream countries can improve perceived water quantity satisfaction of downstream publics, additional actions must still be taken to change the traditional concepts of the public.

A Friendly Model for Water Resources Allocation in the River Basin

2014 ◽  
Vol 1065-1069 ◽  
pp. 2933-2936
Author(s):  
Chun Xiao ◽  
Fang Yang ◽  
Zhi Peng Ma
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Hubei Province ◽  
Resources Allocation ◽  
Compound System ◽  
Water Resources Allocation ◽  
Allocation Pattern ◽  
Water Resources System

Aiming at the disadvantages of current allocation pattern of water resources in the river basin, this paper first put forward the concept of water resources system friendly, and then quantified the allocation principles of water resources by constructing friendly function, and finally proposed the friendly allocation pattern of water resources with maximizing friendly function of water resources system as the objective. The friendly allocation pattern makes water resources compound system and its subsystems and the allocation principles of water resources associated with each other organically, whose concept is definite. The proposed allocation pattern was applied in the study of water resources allocation in Fuhuan River Basin in Hubei Province, whose reasonableness and validity was verified when comparing with other patterns.

Research on Water Resource Initial Allocation of Yellow River Basin Based on the AHP Model

2012 ◽  
Vol 518-523 ◽  
pp. 4216-4221
Author(s):  
Xin Li ◽  
Jun Wan ◽  
Jie Lin Jia ◽  
Qiang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Basin ◽  
Resources Allocation ◽  
Water Resources Allocation ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Ahp Model ◽  
Initial Allocation ◽  
Basin Water

Based on the principles of fairness, efficiency and sustainability, the assessment indicator system of the initial allocation of the river basin water resources is constructed in Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. By using the AHP model built, Standardization Law and Matlab software, an empirical study of the initial allocation of water resources in Yellow River Basin is got and the allocation scheme is put forward. Research shows that the AHP method is more scientific and rational in the river basin water resources allocation. The fairness and efficiency of fetching water can be reflected by readjustment on original Water resources allocation in nine provinces of Yellow River Basin. It is reasonable of the initial allocation of the Yellow River Basin Water Resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document